Creating a Center of Excellence ................................................... CARING More about Your Organization than Others Think Wise ����������3 RISKING More than Others Think Safe to Change the Corporate Culture ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������5 DREAMING More than Others Think Practical about the Potential of Your Organization �������������������������������������������������������������������7 EXPECTING More than Others Find Possible from Your Human Capital Assets ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������8

Author(s):  
Bill Emmott

Gender inequality lies at the core of Japan’s human capital weakness as well as of its social ailments of declining marriage and low fertility. Prime Minister Abe Shinzo declared his ambition, soon after taking office in late 2012, of achieving much greater female empowerment. Progress has been made, notably in increased childcare provision, but considerable barriers remain. The human capital embodied in Japanese women has improved greatly thanks to the rise in access to university education for female students in the 1990s and 2000s, but this has not yet been translated into leadership roles in part because most organizations use hierarchies ordered strictly by age but also because corporate culture (in the private and public sectors alike) is oriented towards long working hours, enforced socializing, and short-notice job postings, in continued disregard of families and of the now-dominant double-earner households. More women are however fighting back against overt discrimination, the Abe government has introduced a Work-Style Reform Bill to combat long working hours, and more companies are taking the need for diversity seriously. Role models have emerged in a wide range of fields and soon a critical mass of women in decision-making positions will be achieved.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (01) ◽  
pp. 89-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Si Jie Lim ◽  
Gregory White ◽  
Alina Lee ◽  
Yuni Yuningsih

Purpose This paper aims to measure mean voluntary intellectual capital disclosure (ICD) quality score for a sample of Australian Stock Exchange-listed biotechnology firms in the 2003, 2006 and 2010 reporting periods. The aim was to use data for the same companies over the whole period to discover whether the quality of voluntary reporting practice was improving over time, measuring lagged-mean ICD quality score against possible determinants of management disclosure practice. Design/methodology/approach Mean ICD quality score, and associated frequency data, was measured against possible determinants of managers’ disclosure practice. The dependent variable was an 18-item classification of ICD based on Sveiby’s Intangible Assets Monitor (Sveiby, 1997). Data collected from S&P Capital IQ database were used to compare ICD disclosure quality with possible drivers: competition (capital intensity); performance (profit and market returns); monitoring (audit firm and ownership); and control variables (revenue and leverage). Findings Mean voluntary disclosures of internal capital and external capital lower the quality over time using paired sample t-test comparison against 2003 as a base year. The lowest quality disclosure was about human capital, and the highest quality was about internal capital. Individual disclosure items within internal, external and human capital classification showed that internal capital items (intellectual property, corporate culture, management processes and financial relations) and external capital item (customers) were the significant contributors. Investigation of drivers using Spearman’s correlation against lagged ICD data showed that performance (relative market returns) and monitoring (ownership diffusion) were significant drivers of voluntary ICD, both in expected and unexpected ways. Originality/value Voluntary ICD quality and quantity are rarely measured in the same paper. The findings are unique and interesting especially for innovative Australian R&D firms when compared to recent findings for a larger sample of French companies.


Ugol ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 18-25
Author(s):  
E.V. Kharchenko ◽  
◽  
S.A. Volkov ◽  
S.I. Zakharov ◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Vladislav L. Anichin ◽  
Larisa A. Tretyakovа ◽  
Marina V. Vladyka ◽  
Julia Yu. Vashcheykina

Author(s):  
G. Irishin

This publication presents regular materials of the scientific workshop "Modern Development Problems", which is held in the Center for Development and Modernization Studies of IMEMO RAN. The primary focus of the speaker and other workshop participants is on comparison of the two BRICS countries  Brazil and Russia. Herewith, the main emphasis is laid on the analysis of social development tendencies, because the quality of human capital assets is what determines the quality of economic growth and a country's position in the world in the long run.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document