The reliability of the conventional gas permeation testing method for characterizing the porous asymmetric membranes: a conceptual review

2016 ◽  
pp. 309-322
Keyword(s):  
Gas Permeation ◽  
Asymmetric Membranes ◽  
Testing Method

Polyimide asymmetric membranes: Elaboration, morphology, and gas permeation performance

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (7) ◽  
pp. 1838-1848 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Leblanc ◽  
D. Le Cerf ◽  
C. Chappey ◽  
D. Langevin ◽  
M. Métayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gas Permeation ◽  
Asymmetric Membranes

The present state of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 285-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. Guyer
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Tests ◽  
Arterial Thrombosis ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Antiplatelet Agents ◽  
Antiplatelet Drug ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Testing Method ◽  
Pharmacological Response ◽  
Platelet Physiology

SummaryAntiplatelet therapy has demonstrated significant clinical benefit in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. However, as with any treatment strategy it has been unable to prevent all cardiovascular events. This is far from surprising when considering the complexity of arterial thrombosis and more specifically platelet physiology. This lack of treatment success has provoked the introduction of various diagnostic tests and testing platforms with the intent of guiding and optimizing clinical treatment. Such tests have resulted in the generation of clinical data that suggest suboptimal response to antiplatelet agents such as aspirin and clopidogrel.In the case of both aspirin and clopidogrel, this suboptimal response has been termed resistance. Drug resistance would imply a lack of pharmacological response that has not been specifically investigated in many of the clinical studies performed to date. Rather, the term resistance has been used to describe various facets of platelet activation and aggregation relative to the testing method. Many of these measured parameters are not addressed in the therapeutic intent of the antiplatelet drug in question.

Pengujian pada Aplikasi Penggajian Pegawai dengan menggunakan Metode Blackbox

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Vadlan Febrian ◽  
Muhamad Rizki Ramadhan ◽  
Muhammad Faisal ◽  
Aries Saifudin
Keyword(s):  
Data Entry ◽  
Black Box ◽  
Application Form ◽  
Value Analysis ◽  
Test Function ◽  
Testing Method ◽  
Black Box Testing ◽  
Sample Testing ◽  
Testing Techniques ◽  
Program Error

In this employee payroll application, if there is an error program there will be a loss for employees and the company. Losses for employees, if this application program error occurs then the salary reduction will experience delays due to the difficulty in the process of calculating employee salaries and employees will be late in receiving salaries. Losses for the company, if there is an error program in this application, the company will suffer losses if the employee wants a salary reduction quickly but the company cannot calculate quickly and accurately. In solving this problem, the authors use the black box testing method. Black box testing method is a test that sees the results of execution through test data and ensures the function of the software. Black box testing method has several testing techniques, namely Sample Testing, Boundary Value Analysis, Equivalence Partitions and others. From the testing techniques that have been mentioned, we use the Equivalence Partitions testing technique. Equivalence Partitions are tests that refer to data entry on the employee payroll application form, input will be tested and then put together based on the test function, both valid and invalid values. The expected results of this test are a payroll system for employees who are computerized, have standard rules in the process of developing the program so that it is easy to develop and maintain, and can minimize errors in processing salary calculations for employees.

Analisis Kesalahan Penggunaan Jinyici dalam Membuat Kalimat Bahasa Mandarin pada Mahasiswa Semester VI Angkatan 2014 Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Mandarin Universitas Negeri Semarang

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Soleha ◽  
Fansi Onita Santoso ◽  
Zaim Elmubarok
Keyword(s):  
Language Education ◽  
Quantitative Approach ◽  
Education Department ◽  
Testing Method ◽  
Mandarin Language

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui besar persentase kesalahan penggunaan (jìnyìcí), mengetahui kesalahan apa saja yang dilakukan mahasiswa, menentukan cara untuk membedakan penggunaan (jìnyìcí) dan merumuskan solusi yang dapat dilakukan untuk mengurangi kesalahan penggunaan (jìnyìcí) tersebut. Pendekatan penelitian yang dilakukan adalah deskriptif kuantitatif. Populasi dan sampel pada penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa semester VI angkatan 2014 Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Mandarin Universitas Negeri Semarang sebanyak 25 mahasiswa. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan metode dokumentasi dan metode tes. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui persentase kesalahan penggunaan (jìnyìcí) adalah sebesar 28,4%. Kesalahan tersebut tergolong pada tingkat rendah, namun ada beberapa kesalahan yang perlu lebih diperhatikan yaitu kesalahan dalam penggunaan fungsi tata bahasa dan kesalahan dalam memahami makna. Cara membedakan penggunaan (jìnyìcí) dapat dilakukan mahasiswa dengan mempelajari fungsi tata bahasa kosakata (jìnyìcí) dan memahami makna kosakata (jìnyìcí). Solusi yang dapat dilakukan adalah mempelajari fungsi tata bahasa kosakata (jìnyìcí) secara keseluruhan dengan benar, memahami makna kosakata (jìnyìcí) secara spesifik, dan memperbanyak latihan membuat kalimat menggunakan kosakata (jìnyìcí).This study aims to identify mistake percentage in using (jìnyìcí), identify what mistakes conducted by students, determine how to differentiate the usage of (jìnyìcí), and formulate solution to reduce mistake in using (jìnyìcí). This study uses descriptive-quantitative approach. There are 25 sixth students of Mandarin Language Education Department in Universitas Negeri Semarang as population and sample. In addition, data is collected by documentation and testing method. Based on the analysis, there is 28,4% of mistake in using (jìnyìcí). This finding is categorized as low. However, there are some mistakes that need to be noted. For instance, mistake in using grammar and interpreting meaning. Furthermore, (jìnyìcí) can be differentiate by studying grammar of (jìnyìcí) and understand the meaning of (jìnyìcí). Finally, it is recommended to study the grammar of (jìnyìcí), specifically understand the meaning of (jìnyìcí) and increase the exercise to make sentences using (jìnyìcí).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document