Mitigation Capacity Building for Crisis and Emergency management: Lessons from Global Cases

2016 ◽  
pp. 195-196
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Management ◽  
Capacity Building

Public health emergency management capacity building in Guinea: 2014-2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 179
Author(s):  
Lise D. Martel ◽  
Michael Phipps ◽  
Amadou Traore ◽  
Claire J. Standley ◽  
Mohamed L. Soumah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Emergency Management ◽  
Capacity Building ◽  
Public Health Emergency ◽  
Management Capacity

scholarly journals Addressing challenges for future strategic-level emergency management: reframing, networking, and capacity-building

Disasters ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 306-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karyn Bosomworth ◽  
Christine Owen ◽  
Steven Curnin
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Management ◽  
Capacity Building

Public health emergency management capacity building in Guinea: 2014-2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 179
Author(s):  
Sakoba Keita ◽  
Antoine Morel Vulliez ◽  
Amadou Traore ◽  
Claire J. Standley ◽  
Mohamed L. Soumah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Emergency Management ◽  
Capacity Building ◽  
Public Health Emergency ◽  
Management Capacity

scholarly journals Implementation strategies in emergency management of children: A scoping review

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0248826
Author(s):  
Alex Aregbesola ◽  
Ahmed M. Abou-Setta ◽  
George N. Okoli ◽  
Maya M. Jeyaraman ◽  
Otto Lam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Management ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Capacity Building ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background Implementation strategies are vital for the uptake of evidence to improve health, healthcare delivery, and decision-making. Medical or mental emergencies may be life-threatening, especially in children, due to their unique physiological needs when presenting in the emergency departments (EDs). Thus, practice change in EDs attending to children requires evidence-informed considerations regarding the best approaches to implementing research evidence. We aimed to identify and map the characteristics of implementation strategies used in the emergency management of children. Methods We conducted a scoping review using Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. We searched four databases [Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cochrane Central (Wiley) and CINAHL (Ebsco)] from inception to May 2019, for implementation studies in children (≤21 years) in emergency settings. Two pairs of reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted the data. We performed a descriptive analysis of the included studies. Results We included 87 studies from a total of 9,607 retrieved citations. Most of the studies were before and after study design (n = 68, 61%) conducted in North America (n = 63, 70%); less than one-tenth of the included studies (n = 7, 8%) were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). About one-third of the included studies used a single strategy to improve the uptake of research evidence. Dissemination strategies were more commonly utilized (n = 77, 89%) compared to other implementation strategies; process (n = 47, 54%), integration (n = 49, 56%), and capacity building and scale-up strategies (n = 13, 15%). Studies that adopted capacity building and scale-up as part of the strategies were most effective (100%) compared to dissemination (90%), process (88%) and integration (85%). Conclusions Studies on implementation strategies in emergency management of children have mostly been non-randomized studies. This review suggests that ‘dissemination’ is the most common strategy used, and ‘capacity building and scale-up’ are the most effective strategies. Higher-quality evidence from randomized-controlled trials is needed to accurately assess the effectiveness of implementation strategies in emergency management of children.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document