Neck Lift

2015 ◽  
pp. 804-811
Keyword(s):  
Neck Lift

Long-Term Study of Complications of Neck Lift

1983 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 563-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Guerrerosantos ◽  
Mario Sandoval ◽  
Jorge Solazar
Keyword(s):  
Term Study ◽  
Neck Lift ◽  
Long Term Study

Concepts of Neck Lift

1983 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-378
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Biggs ◽  
Lawrence Koplin
Keyword(s):  
Neck Lift

Facelift Part II: Surgical Techniques and Complications

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed M Hashem ◽  
Rafael A Couto ◽  
Chris Surek ◽  
Marco Swanson ◽  
James E Zins
Keyword(s):  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Aesthetic Surgery ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Recent Survey ◽  
Critical Reading ◽  
Neck Lift ◽  
Macs Lift ◽  
Face And Neck Lift

Abstract Although previous publications have reviewed face and neck-lift anatomy and technique from different perspectives, seldom were the most-relevant anatomical details and widely practiced techniques comprehensively summarized in a single work. As a result, the beginner is left with a plethora of varied publications that require sorting, re-arrangement, and critical reading. A recent survey of US plastic surgery residents and program directors disclosed less facility with facelift surgery when compared to aesthetic surgery of the breast and trunk. To this end four of the widely practiced facelift techniques (ie, MACS-lift, lateral-SMASectomy, extended-SMAS, and composite rhytidectomy) are described in an easy review format. The highlights of each are formatted followed by a summary of complications. Finally, the merits and limitations of these individual techniques are thoroughly compared and discussed.

Optimizing Outcomes in Neck Lift Surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Gerald O’Daniel
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Planning ◽  
Planning Process ◽  
Objective Evaluation ◽  
Volumetric Analysis ◽  
Anterior Neck ◽  
Surgical Specimen ◽  
Neck Lift ◽  
Fat Reduction ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background In certain patients there is an imbalance between the volume of the anterior neck and the mandibular confines that require reductional sculpting and repositioning of the hyoid to optimize neck lifting procedures. Objectives A quantitative volumetric analysis of impact of the management of supraplatysmal and subplatysmal structures of the neck by comparing surgical specimen was performed to determine the impact of reduction on cervical contouring. Methods In 152 patients undergoing deep cervicoplasty, the frequency of modification of each surgical maneuver and amount of supraplatysmal and subplatysmal volume removed was measured in cubic centimeters using a volume displacement technique. Results The mean volume of total volume remove from the supraplatysmal and subplatysmal planes during deep cervicoplasty was 22.3 cm3 with subplatysmal volume representing 73%. Subplatysmal volume was reduced in 152 patients. Deep fat was reduced in 96% of patients with mean volume of 7 cm3, submandibular glands (76%) with mean volume 6.5cm, anterior digastric muscles (70%) with mean volume 2cm3, peri-hyoid fascia (32%) with mean volume <1cm3 and mylohyoid reduction (14%) with mean volume < 1cm3 in the series. The anterior digastric muscles were plicated to reposition the hyoid in 34% of cases. Supraplatysmal fat reduction was 6.3 cm3 in 40% of patients. Conclusions The study provides a comprehensive analysis of the impact of volume modification of the central neck during deep cervicoplasty. This objective evaluation of neck volume may help guide clinicians in the surgical planning process and provide a foundation for optimizing cervicofacial rejuvenation techniques.

Recent Advances in Neck Lift

1987 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome E. Adamson
Keyword(s):  
Neck Lift ◽  
Recent Advances

Neck Lift

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Marten ◽  
Dino Elyassnia
Keyword(s):  
Neck Lift
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document