Intervertebral disk prolapse

2015 ◽  
pp. 269-274
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Shenot ◽  
M. Louis Moy
Keyword(s):  
Intervertebral Disk ◽  
Disk Prolapse

Intervertebral Disk Prolapse in a Ferret

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 667-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neus Morera ◽  
Xavier Valls ◽  
Joan Mascort
Keyword(s):  
Intervertebral Disk ◽  
Disk Prolapse

Nonspecific Chronic Back Pain: Sixth Edition Approaches

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 14-15
Author(s):  
Jay Blaisdell ◽  
James B. Talmage
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Back Pain ◽  
Intervertebral Disk ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
Sixth Edition ◽  
Whole Person ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Intervertebral Disk Herniation ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Ratings for “non-specific chronic, or chronic reoccurring, back pain” are based on the diagnosis-based impairment method whereby an impairment class, usually representing a range of impairment values within a cell of a grid, is selected by diagnosis and “specific criteria” (key factors). Within the impairment class, the default impairment value then can be modified using non-key factors or “grade modifiers” such as functional history, physical examination, and clinical studies using the net adjustment formula. The diagnosis of “nonspecific chronic, or chronic reoccurring, back pain” can be rated in class 0 and 1; the former has a default value of 0%, and the latter has a default value of 2% before any modifications. The key concept here is that the physician believes that the patient is experiencing pain, yet there are no related objective findings, most notably radiculopathy as distinguished from “nonverifiable radicular complaints.” If the individual is found not to have radiculopathy and the medical record shows that the patient has never had clinically verifiable radiculopathy, then the diagnosis of “intervertebral disk herniation and/or AOMSI [alteration of motion segment integrity] cannot be used.” If the patient is asymptomatic at maximum medical improvement, then impairment Class 0 should be chosen, not Class 1; a final whole person impairment rating of 1% indicates incorrect use of the methodology.

Motion Analysis of the Cervical Spine

2004 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Patrick R. Luers
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Intervertebral Disk ◽  
Radiographic Evaluation ◽  
Ligamentous Injury ◽  
Pattern Of Injury ◽  
Motion Segment ◽  
Single Pattern ◽  
Compensatory Motion ◽  
Loss Of Motion ◽  
Flexion And Extension

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fifth Edition, defines a motion segment as “two adjacent vertebrae, the intervertebral disk, the apophyseal or facet joints, and ligamentous structures between the vertebrae.” The range of motion from segment to segment varies, and loss of motion segment integrity is defined as “an anteroposterior motion of one vertebra over another that is greater than 3.5 mm in the cervical spine, greater than 2.5 mm in the thoracic spine, and greater than 4.5 mm in the lumbar spine.” Multiple etiologies are associated with increased motion in the cervical spine; some are physiologic or compensatory and others are pathologic. The standard radiographic evaluation of instability and ligamentous injury in the cervical spine consists of lateral flexion and extension x-ray views, but no single pattern of injury is identified in whiplash injuries. Fluoroscopy or cineradiographic techniques may be more sensitive than other methods for evaluating subtle abnormal motion in the cervical spine. The increased motion thus detected then must be evaluated to determine whether it represents normal physiologic motion, normal compensatory motion, motion related to underlying degenerative disk and/or facet disease, or increased motion related to ligamentous injury. Imaging studies should be performed and interpreted as instructed in the AMA Guides.

Effect of Parathyroid Hormone on MAPK Signaling and Calcification Markers in Human Intervertebral Disk Cells

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0032-1319991-s-0032-1319991
Author(s):  
P. Madiraju ◽  
R. Gawri ◽  
J. Antoniou ◽  
F. Mwale
Keyword(s):  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Mapk Signaling ◽  
Intervertebral Disk

Ultrashort Time-to-Echo MRI of the Cartilaginous Endplate: Technique and Association with Intervertebral Disk Degeneration

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0032-1319972-s-0032-1319972
Author(s):  
T. Law ◽  
M. P. Anthony ◽  
D. Samartzis ◽  
Q. Chan ◽  
M. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intervertebral Disk ◽  
Intervertebral Disk Degeneration ◽  
Disk Degeneration ◽  
Cartilaginous Endplate

Combination of MRI and 99mTc-NTP 15-5 Scintigraphy for the Assessment of Intervertebral Disk Degeneration and Tissue Engineering

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0032-1319873-s-0032-1319873
Author(s):  
P. Colombier ◽  
J. Clouet ◽  
E. Miot-Noirault ◽  
A. Vidal ◽  
F. Cachin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Intervertebral Disk ◽  
Intervertebral Disk Degeneration ◽  
Disk Degeneration

Effect of In-Utero Exposure to High Dose Diethylstilbestrol on Intervertebral Disk in Adult Male and Female Progeny

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0032-1319931-s-0032-1319931
Author(s):  
S. Al Rowas ◽  
R. Gawri ◽  
R. Haddad ◽  
A. Almaawi ◽  
L. E. Chalifour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adult Male ◽  
In Utero ◽  
Intervertebral Disk ◽  
In Utero Exposure ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Female Progeny ◽  
Male And Female

Management of The Cervical Spine Tuberculosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Sabri Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Intervertebral Disk ◽  
Posterior Fixation ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Vertebral Bodies ◽  
Intervertebral Disk Space ◽  
Developed Nations

Tuberculosis of the cervical spine is a rare clinical condition (10%), most commonly affected lower thoracic region (40-50% of the cases). Spinal tuberculosis is a destructive form of tuberculosis. It accounts for approximately half of all cases of musculoskeletal tuberculosis. Spinal tuberculosis is more common in children and young adults. The incidence of spinal tuberculosis is increasing in developed nations. Characteristically, there is a destruction of the intervertebral disk space and the adjacent vertebral bodies, collapse of the spinal elements, and anterior wedging leading to kyphosis and gibbus formation. For the diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis, magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive than x-ray and more specific than computed tomography. Magnetic resonance imaging frequently demonstrates an involvement of the vertebral bodies on either side of the disk, disk destruction, cold abscess, vertebral collapse, and presence of vertebral column deformities. Anti-tuberculous treatment remains the cornerstone of treatment. Surgery may be required in selected cases, e.g. large abscess formation, severe kyphosis, an evolving neurological deficit, or lack of response to medical treatment. The quality of debridement and bony fusion is optimal when the anterior approach is used. Posterior fixation is the best means of achieving reduction followed by stable sagittal alignment over time. With early diagnosis and early treatment, the prognosis is generally good.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document