Segmental bridge behavior during bridge testing

2008 ◽  
pp. 71-72
Author(s):  
M Zupcic ◽  
D Banic ◽  
D Tkalcic ◽  
Z Peric
Keyword(s):  
Bridge Testing ◽  
Segmental Bridge

Jones, R.A. and Peiris, R.S.A., "Load Distribution Analysis Of A Continuous Two-Span Multi-Beam Bridge Deck", ARRB (Australia Road Research Board) Proceedings, Vol. II, Part 2,1982. 16. "Distribution Of Wheel Loads On Highway Bridges", NCHRP Project 20-5, Topic 14-22, February, 1984 17. Hays, C.O. and Hackey, J.E., "Lateral Distribution Of Wheel Loads On Highway Bridges using The Finite Element Method", Structures And Materials Research Report No. 84-3, University of Florida, Department of Civil Engineering, December, 1984. 18. Newmark, N.M., Seiss, C.P. and Penman, R.R., "Studies of Slab And Beam Highway Bridges - Part I Tests Of Simple Span Right I-Beam Bridges", University of Illinois, Bulletin, March, 1946. 19 Burdette, E.G. and Goodpasture, D.W., "Full-Scale Bridge Testing - An Evaluation of Bridge Design Criteria", Final Report. The University of Tennessee, Department of Civil Engineering, Dec. 1971. 20. King, J.P.C. and Csagoly, P.F., "Field Testing of Aguasabon River Bridge in Ontario", Transportation Research Record 579, 1976. 21. Dorton, R.A., Holowka, M., and King, J.P.C., "The Conestogo River Bridge - Design and Testing", Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vo). Heins, C.P., "Highway Bridge Field Tests In The United States, 1948-70', pulbic Roads, 1972. 25. Gangarao, H.V.S., "Survey Of Field And Laboratory Tests On Bridge Systems", Transportation Research Record 645, 1977.

1987 ◽  
pp. 54-54
Keyword(s):  
Civil Engineering ◽  
Field Tests ◽  
Highway Bridges ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Bridge Design ◽  
University Of Tennessee ◽  
Bridge Testing ◽  
Transportation Research Record ◽  
Materials Research ◽  
Transportation Research

scholarly journals STUDENČICA BRIDGE TESTING

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marino Jurišić ◽  
◽  
Marko Cvitković
Keyword(s):  
Bridge Testing

Application of the Influence Line on the Bridge Testing

2012 ◽  
Vol 594-597 ◽  
pp. 1586-1589
Author(s):  
Run Feng Zhang ◽  
Xian Min Zhang ◽  
Chun Xiang Qi
Keyword(s):  
Beam Model ◽  
The Finite Element Method ◽  
Shearing Force ◽  
Unit Load ◽  
Bridge Testing ◽  
Damage Degree ◽  
Influence Line ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Set Up ◽  
The Moment

In order to discuss the sensibility of influence line on the damage, a two-span continuous beam model is set up using the finite element method in the paper. The two damage positions at the middle span and 1/4 span are considered. And different damage degrees are simulated by the different crack depths. The shearing force and moment at four key positions of the beam are calculated under the moving unit load separately. Results show that the moment influence line at the middle support of the beam is very sensitive to the beam damage, while the moment influence line at other positions and the shearing force influence line at each position are insensitive. In the moment influence line of the beam middle support position, the obvious different values appear at the middle span when damage in the middle span. As damage in the 1/4 span, the obvious different also appear at the damage position, and the difference is increased unconspicuous up to the middle span, and then decreased soon. The conclusion is beneficial to determine the position of damage by means of comparing the moment influence line with that of undamaged bridge. Moreover, the difference value of moment influence line can also be used to estimate the damage degree.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document