A Brief History of the Race Concept in Physical Anthropology

1966 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wyatt Macgaffey

Recent accounts of the proto-history of Africa use data from physical anthropology, but also concepts of race which physical anthropologists in general have abandoned as unsatisfactory; the paper seeks to explain this phenomenon sociologically. Late nineteenth-century political and sociological trends helped to produce patterns of thought which can no longer be regarded as affording adequate explanations of social processes. These patterns combined idealism, or the method of contrasting ideal types, with pseudo-Darwinism, which sought the origins of political development in the interaction of differently endowed groups. In African ethnography of the early twentieth century such concepts led to the view that the continent was inhabited by two groups, Caucasoids and Negroids, and by mixtures of the two which remained mixtures, to be analysed as such. The Caucasoid and Negroid types were regarded as absolute and universal, represented equally in the biological, linguistic, cultural and political aspects of man.


1948 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 16-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marshall T. Newman

Studies of physical remains in aboriginal Peru have lagged behind those concerned with archaeology, and barely enough is known of Peruvian racial history to permit a synthesis at this time. Difficulties are three-fold: first, few physical anthropologists with a proper sense of problem have worked there; second, archaeologically documented skeletal series from Peru are not plentiful; and third, cranial deformation, while culturally of vital interest, tends to mask racial characters. Furthermore, sweeping generalizations from meager evidence by Imbelloni and others have persuaded the uncritical that the racial problems of the aboriginal Peru-Bolivian area have been largely solved. Actually, physical anthropology in Peru as compared to the archaeology is just entering the Uhle stage of rigorous scientific method. Now is the time, therefore, to reappraise our knowledge and to outline future research.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 912-922
Author(s):  
Yuri A. Zeleneev ◽  
◽  
Iskander L. Izmailov ◽  
Leonard F. Nedashkovsky ◽  
◽  
...  

Research objectives: To consider the creative path and main views of L.T. Yablonsky, as well as his influence on ideas about the ethnic history of the Golden Horde population and theoretical problems of ethnogenesis. Research materials: The authors of the article were based on numerous publications by L.T. Yablonsky, as well as personal impressions from meetings with the researcher on expeditions and at academic conferences. Results and novelty of the research: The authors consider the formation of L.T. Yablonsky as a unique specialist who combined archaeological training and professional study of physical anthropology. This allowed him to draw important conclusions about the formation of the Golden Horde population. Later, he resorted to this method to study the early nomads of the Aral Sea region and the South Urals. His works became an event in the research field, since they positively differed from others not only by an interdisciplinary approach to the problem under study – at the junction of archaeology and ethnogenetics – but also by the wide use of anthropological materials. Prior to these works, all information about the population of the Jochid ulus was fragmentary and unsystematic, and he was the very researcher who first connected the data of paleoanthropology and the analysis of the burial rite in medieval burial grounds. He proved the fact that the Golden Horde population consisted of mixed population groups, and identified those population groups that, in his opinion, came from Central Asia. L.T. Yablonsky attached great importance to the methodology of research on ethnogenesis and ethnic history. He advocated an integrated scientific approach to their study and emphasized the huge role of paleoanthropology and archaeology in solving ethnogenetic problems. In his opinion, the rapid divergence of various scientific disciplines – ethnology, archaeology, physical anthropology, and genetics – was the main problem that hindered the development of scientific ethnogenetic research. L.T. Yablonsky, therefore, believed that expanding comprehensive research would help solve this problem.


Isis ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-117
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Goodrum

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document