Cameras and Collaborative Spaces (the Ideagora)

2014 ◽  
pp. 197-216
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Spaces

Joining a collaborative space: is it really a better place to work?

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignasi Capdevila
Keyword(s):  
Social Innovation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Innovation Activities ◽  
Collaborative Spaces ◽  
Innovation Modes ◽  
Living Labs ◽  
Collaborative Space ◽  
Coworking Spaces ◽  
Innovation Approach

Purpose Collaborative spaces such as Fab Labs, Living Labs, coworking spaces, hackerspaces, makerspaces, etc. are localized spaces that offer open access to resources. The purpose of this paper is to explain what motivates participants in such spaces, according to different innovation logics. Design/methodology/approach The paper is based on qualitative studies of 43 collaborative spaces in Paris and Barcelona. Findings This paper proposes a typology of different collaborative spaces to understand what motivates their participants. The classification is based on the innovation approach of each type of space: methods and techniques of ideation, social innovation, open innovation and user-driven innovation. Research limitations/implications The classification of collaborative spaces clearly identifies different innovation approaches. However, it might result to be too simplistic and may not represent all spaces under the same denomination. Practical implications This paper provides some guidelines for managers who run or intend to open a collaborative space. In bottom-up innovation modes, to increase the commitment of the participants, managers should provide the tools and resources needed to successfully achieve the goals of the members’ projects. In top-down innovation modes, managers should rather focus on designing an attractive and rewarding process of ideation. Originality/value This paper contributes to the understanding of collaborative spaces; it shows that participants’ engagement is related to the nature of the innovation activities that take place in collaborative spaces, and it compares different types of spaces to explain their differences and similarities.

Collaborative Spaces Promoting Creativity and Innovation

2020 ◽  
Vol n°31 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Boutillier ◽  
Ignasi Capdevila ◽  
Laurent Dupont ◽  
Laure Morel
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Spaces ◽  
Creativity And Innovation

Facebook and the Societal Aspects of Formal Learning

2015 ◽  
pp. 1345-1367
Author(s):  
Carolyn Woodley ◽  
Petrina Dorrington
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Management System ◽  
Learning Management System ◽  
Student Support ◽  
Teaching Staff ◽  
Formal Learning ◽  
Cooperative Group ◽  
Collaborative Spaces ◽  
Learning Management ◽  
Critical Consideration

An online subject used social media to provide “collaborative spaces” that were “additional and complementary” to discussion in the university's Learning Management System (LMS). Facebook and Twitter provided optional “informal spaces” in which students “talk about general issues to do with media and connect with other students in the unit.” This chapter's analysis of Facebook posts shows a cooperative group of peers providing advice on assessment and recommending useful resources. Analysis, however, reveals that, as well as supportive posts, a proportion of posts could be considered inappropriate, distracting, or even, infrequently, inflammatory. Guidelines about acceptable behaviour must be imposed by teaching staff. More importantly, optional participation in social media sites requires critical consideration. If Facebook is used as a student support space for an online subject, it should be integrated into the curriculum and have an explicit purpose; making social media sites optional alongside mandatory university-supported platforms can prove problematic.

Use “hhh” Technology in the Transformative Models of Online Education

2011 ◽  
pp. 340-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vardan Mkrttchian
Keyword(s):  
Distance Education ◽  
Online Education ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Online Distance Education ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Collaborative Spaces ◽  
Online Spaces ◽  
Online Distance ◽  
Hybrid Distance

All People Internet University (“hhh”) technology is a hybrid distance education approach that provides students with opportunities to explore real-world issues through authentic learning experiences within collaborative learning environments. This chapter defines this online distance education approach, outlines an “hhh” framework, and showcases an “hhh” archetype. In “hhh” environments, classroom teachers are not positioned in the role of teacher/facilitator/designer in the online learning spaces. The “hhh” online spaces are collaborative spaces where students, teachers, subject experts, and “hhh” team members interact with one another; these are community spaces where traditional hierarchical classroom roles are blurred. Students’ roles transform due to the flexibility and design of the “hhh” learning environments as they move from student to reflective practitioner, providing for new ways of learning and teaching.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document