Human–Computer Interaction and User Experience

2014 ◽  
pp. V-1-V-2
Keyword(s):  
Human Computer Interaction ◽  
User Experience ◽  
Computer Interaction

User Experience Is All There Is

i-com ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-213
Author(s):  
Marc Hassenzahl ◽  
Michael Burmester ◽  
Franz Koller
Keyword(s):  
Human Computer Interaction ◽  
User Experience ◽  
Interactive Technology ◽  
Current Perspective ◽  
Look Back ◽  
Effectiveness And Efficiency ◽  
Computer Interaction

Abstract Twenty years ago, we published an article in the first issue of the i-com entitled “Usability ist nicht alles” (Burmester et al., 2002), that is, “Usability isn’t everything”. This was certainly a provocative title. For most German researchers and practitioners of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) usability was all there is and all that was ever needed to guarantee humane technology. Back then, we profoundly disagreed. We were convinced that there is more to the quality of interactive technology than mere effectiveness and efficiency. Now, twenty years later it seems safe to say that we had a point. Let’s take this as an opportunity to take a brief and utterly anecdotal look back, to take stock of the current perspective on designing the (user) experience, as well as to discuss some future opportunities and challenges.

Understanding User Experience

2019 ◽  
pp. 1588-1599
Author(s):  
Camille Dickson-Deane ◽  
Hsin-Liang (Oliver) Chen
Keyword(s):  
Human Computer Interaction ◽  
Cognitive Science ◽  
User Experience ◽  
Group Behavior ◽  
User Experiences ◽  
Societal Needs ◽  
Specific Outcome ◽  
Physical Reaction ◽  
Computer Interaction

User experience determines the quality of an interaction being used by an actor in order to achieve a specific outcome. The actor can have varying roles and evolving needs, thus reviewing and predicting experiences are important. As an actor uses and gains feedback, the feedback guides individual and group behavior, thus becoming pertinent to how interactions occur. This chapter questions how artefacts are designed to promote such interactions and what processes should be incorporated to ensure successful interpretation, use, (physical) reaction, and conation. This chapter discusses the effects of user experiences today based on societal needs and expectations. It shows how the field is delineated into numerous sub-topics, all of which can stand on their own yet still draw from each other. The discussions will include fields such as cognitive science, human-computer interaction, learning sciences, and even ergonomics to show how design and subsequently interactions can assist in having successful user experiences.

Understanding User Experience

2018 ◽  
pp. 7599-7608
Author(s):  
Camille Dickson-Deane ◽  
Hsin-Liang (Oliver) Chen
Keyword(s):  
Human Computer Interaction ◽  
Cognitive Science ◽  
User Experience ◽  
Group Behavior ◽  
User Experiences ◽  
Societal Needs ◽  
Specific Outcome ◽  
Physical Reaction ◽  
Computer Interaction

User experience determines the quality of an interaction being used by an actor in order to achieve a specific outcome. The actor can have varying roles and evolving needs thus reviewing and predicting experiences are important. As an actor uses and gains feedback, the feedback guides individual and group behavior thus becoming pertinent to how interactions occur. This then questions how artefacts are designed to promote such interactions and what processes should be incorporated to ensure successful interpretation, use, [physical] reaction and conation. This chapter discusses the effects of user experiences today based on societal needs and expectations. It shows how the field is delineated into numerous sub-topics all of which can stand on their own yet, still draw from each other. The discussions will include fields such as cognitive science, human computer interaction, learning sciences and even ergonomics to show how design and subsequently interactions can assist in having successful user experiences

scholarly journals English distance learning: possibilities and limitations of MEO for the Flipped Classroom

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyria Rebeca Finardi ◽  
Gicele Vergine Vieira Prebianca ◽  
Jeovani Schmitt
Keyword(s):  
Distance Learning ◽  
University Students ◽  
Human Computer Interaction ◽  
User Experience ◽  
Flipped Classroom ◽  
Writing Skills ◽  
Inverted Classroom ◽  
Computer Interaction

Abstract: The study investigates possibilities and limitations of the course My English Online (MEO) for the inverted classroom format. Two hundred and eighty-nine Brazilian federal university students evaluated MEO software in terms of usability features. Three participants were interviewed for data triangulation. Results of the study suggest that users with more experience are more sensitive to aspects of human-computer interaction than less experienced ones, particularly when the criteria of Flexibility, User Experience, Informational Density and Feedback are considered. In addition, findings also show that the speaking and writing skills are the most difficult to develop in MEO course. The study concludes that, in order to overcome limitations in MEO, especially in terms of the Feedback criterion, the software can and should be used in the flipped classroom format.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document