Evaluation of the Barrier Function of Skin Using Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL): A Critical Overview

2014 ◽  
pp. 145-154
Keyword(s):  
Water Loss ◽  
Barrier Function ◽  
Transepidermal Water Loss ◽  
Critical Overview

scholarly journals Skin Barrier Function in Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis: Transepidermal Water Loss and Temperature as Useful Tools to Assess Disease Severity

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trinidad Montero-Vilchez ◽  
María-Victoria Segura-Fernández-Nogueras ◽  
Isabel Pérez-Rodríguez ◽  
Miguel Soler-Gongora ◽  
Antonio Martinez-Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atopic Dermatitis ◽  
Disease Severity ◽  
Water Loss ◽  
Barrier Function ◽  
Skin Barrier ◽  
Transepidermal Water Loss ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Psoriatic Skin ◽  
Skin Barrier Function ◽  
Healthy Controls

Multiple diagnostic tools are used to evaluate psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (AD) severity, but most of them are based on subjective components. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and temperature are skin barrier function parameters that can be objectively measured and could help clinicians to evaluate disease severity accurately. Thus, the aims of this study are: (1) to compare skin barrier function between healthy skin, psoriatic skin and AD skin; and (2) to assess if skin barrier function parameters could predict disease severity. A cross-sectional study was designed, and epidermal barrier function parameters were measured. The study included 314 participants: 157 healthy individuals, 92 psoriatic patients, and 65 atopic dermatitis patients. TEWL was significantly higher, while stratum corneum hydration (SCH) (8.71 vs. 38.43 vs. 44.39 Arbitrary Units (AU)) was lower at psoriatic plaques than at uninvolved psoriatic skin and healthy controls. Patients with both TEWL > 13.85 g·m−2h−1 and temperature > 30.85 °C presented a moderate/severe psoriasis (psoriasis area severity index (PASI) ≥ 7), with a specificity of 76.3%. TEWL (28.68 vs. 13.15 vs. 11.60 g·m−2 h−1) and temperature were significantly higher, while SCH (25.20 vs. 40.95 vs. 50.73 AU) was lower at AD eczematous lesions than uninvolved AD skin and healthy controls. Patients with a temperature > 31.75 °C presented a moderate/severe AD (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) ≥ 37) with a sensitivity of 81.8%. In conclusion, temperature and TEWL values may help clinicians to determine disease severity and select patients who need intensive treatment.

scholarly journals Effects of Cast Immobilisation on Skin Barrier Function

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 354-359
Author(s):  
Chin Yee Woo ◽  
Mark JA Koh ◽  
Winnie KY Fung ◽  
Cheri SH Chan ◽  
Chong Bing Chua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stratum Corneum ◽  
Water Loss ◽  
Barrier Function ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Skin Barrier ◽  
Transepidermal Water Loss ◽  
Skin Barrier Function ◽  
Hair Density ◽  
Cast Immobilisation ◽  
Volar Surface

Introduction: Cast immobilisation remains the mainstay of treatment for various fractures in paediatric patients, yet patients commonly complain of skin irritation and discomfort. This study aimed to perform a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the effects of cast immobilisation on the skin of children and adolescents. Materials and Methods: Patients aged 6–17 years of age with a fracture treated in a fiberglass short-arm or short-leg cast were recruited. Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum (SC) hydration, hair density and presence of any skin signs were assessed before and after cast. Patients were required to complete a weekly questionnaire to rate itch, malodour, warmth, and dampness of the skin under the cast. Results: A total of 60 subjects completed the study. Thirty-six patients received a short-arm cast; 24 received a short-leg cast. Upon cast removal, TEWL was significantly increased on the volar surface of the arms and legs (P <0.05), and the dorsal surface of the arm (P <0.05). Likewise, SC hydration was significantly increased at most sites (P <0.05), except the volar surface of the leg (P = 0.513). There was no change in hair density. Throughout the duration of casting, there was an increase in itch and malodour scores. Conclusions: Moderate but significant changes in TEWL, SC hydration and subjective symptoms were observed during the duration of cast immobilisation, demonstrating that cast immobilisation for up to 4 weeks exerts moderate adverse impact on patients’ skin. Further studies to explore the use of better materials for cast immobilisation to improve skin barrier function and overall patient satisfaction are warranted. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2020;49:285–93 Ann Acad Med Singapore 2020;49:354–59 Key words: Cast immobilisation, Transepidermal water loss, Stratum corneum hydration

scholarly journals Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL) Reflects Skin Barrier Function of Dog

2008 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 841-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichiro SHIMADA ◽  
Toru YOSHIHARA ◽  
Masahiko YAMAMOTO ◽  
Katsuhiko KONNO ◽  
Yasuyuki MOMOI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Loss ◽  
Barrier Function ◽  
Skin Barrier ◽  
Transepidermal Water Loss ◽  
Skin Barrier Function

scholarly journals Transepidermal Water Loss Does Not Correlate with Skin Barrier Function In Vitro

2002 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 871-875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert P. Chilcott ◽  
Christopher H. Dalton ◽  
Andrew J. Emmanuel ◽  
Ceri E. Allen ◽  
Simon T. Bradley
Keyword(s):  
Water Loss ◽  
Barrier Function ◽  
Skin Barrier ◽  
Transepidermal Water Loss ◽  
Skin Barrier Function

scholarly journals Safety of a formulation containing chitosan microparticles with chamomile: blind controlled clinical trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle Cristina Garbuio ◽  
Cristina Mara Zamarioli ◽  
Maísa Oliveira de Melo ◽  
Patrícia Maria Berardo Gonçalves Maia Campos ◽  
Emília Campos de Carvalho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Single Dose ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Water Loss ◽  
Barrier Function ◽  
Transepidermal Water Loss ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Topical Formulation ◽  
Healthy Participants

ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the safety of a topical formulation containing chamomile microparticles coated with chitosan in the skin of healthy participants. Method: phase I blind, controlled, non-randomized, single-dose clinical trial with control for skin, base formulation, and formulation with microparticles. The variables analyzed were irritation and hydration by the Wilcoxon and Kruskall-Wallis tests. Results: the study started with 35 participants with a mean age of 26.3 years. Of these, 30 (85.71%) were female, 29 (82.90%) were white skinned and 32 (91.40%) had no previous pathologies. One participant was removed from the study reporting erythema at the site of application, and four other participants for not attending the last evaluation. In the 30 participants who completed the study, the tested formulation did not cause erythema, peeling, burning, pruritus or pain; there was an improvement in cutaneous hydration in the site of application of the formulation with microparticles. In the evaluation of the barrier function, there was an increase in transepidermal water loss in all sites. Conclusion: the formulation with chamomile microparticles is safe for topical use, not causing irritation and improving skin hydration over four weeks of use. Its effects on barrier function need further investigation. No. RBR-3h78kz in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document