Bases of Piecewise-Linear Economic-Mathematical Models with Regard to Influence of Unaccounted Factors in Finite-Dimensional Vector Space

2013 ◽  
pp. 71-118
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Models ◽  
Vector Space ◽  
Piecewise Linear ◽  
Dimensional Vector ◽  
Dimensional Vector Space ◽  
Finite Dimensional Vector Space ◽  
Finite Dimensional

scholarly journals Sets of idempotents that generate the semigroup of singular endomorphisms of a finite-dimensional vector space

1982 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. H. Dawlings
Keyword(s):  
Vector Space ◽  
Dimensional Vector ◽  
Dimensional Vector Space ◽  
Finite Dimensional Vector Space ◽  
Finite Dimensional ◽  
Mathematical System

IfMis a mathematical system and EndMis the set of singular endomorphisms ofM, then EndMforms a semigroup under composition of mappings. A number of papers have been written to determine the subsemigroupSMof EndMgenerated by the idempotentsEMof EndMfor different systemsM. The first of these was by J. M. Howie [4]; here the case ofMbeing an unstructured setXwas considered. Howie showed that ifXis finite, then EndX=Sx.

On Some Invariants of a Bilinear Form

1961 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-264
Author(s):  
Jonathan Wild
Keyword(s):  
Vector Space ◽  
Bilinear Form ◽  
Arbitrary Field ◽  
Dimensional Vector ◽  
Dimensional Vector Space ◽  
Finite Dimensional Vector Space ◽  
Finite Dimensional ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
Orthogonal Subspace

Let E be a finite dimensional vector space over an arbitrary field. In E a bilinear form is given. It associates with every sub s pa ce V its right orthogonal sub space V* and its left orthogonal subspace *V. In general we cannot expect that dim V* = dim *V. However this relation will hold in some interesting special cases.

scholarly journals Modular representations of abelian groups with regular rings of invariants

1982 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 229-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruhisa Nakajima
Keyword(s):  
Vector Space ◽  
Polynomial Ring ◽  
Finite Subgroup ◽  
Dimensional Vector ◽  
Modular Representations ◽  
Invariant Polynomials ◽  
Dimensional Vector Space ◽  
Finite Dimensional Vector Space ◽  
Finite Dimensional ◽  
Regular Rings

Let k be a field of characteristic p and G a finite subgroup of GL(V) where V is a finite dimensional vector space over k. Then G acts naturally on the symmetric algebra k[V] of V. We denote by k[V]G the subring of k[V] consisting of all invariant polynomials under this action of G. The following theorem is well known.Theorem 1.1 (Chevalley-Serre, cf. [1, 2, 3]). Assume that p = 0 or (|G|, p) = 1. Then k[V]G is a polynomial ring if and only if G is generated by pseudo-reflections in GL(V).

scholarly journals The ideal structure of idempotent-generated transformation semigroups

1985 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Reynolds ◽  
R. P. Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Vector Space ◽  
Dimensional Vector ◽  
Boolean Ring ◽  
Ideal Structure ◽  
Transformation Semigroups ◽  
Linear Transformations ◽  
Dimensional Vector Space ◽  
Finite Dimensional Vector Space ◽  
Finite Dimensional ◽  
The Ideal

Let X be a set and the semigroup (under composition) of all total transformations from X into itself. In ([6], Theorem 3) Howie characterised those elements of that can be written as a product of idempotents in different from the identity. We gather from review articles that his work was later extended by Evseev and Podran [3, 4] (and independently for finite X by Sullivan [15]) to the semigroup of all partial transformations of X into itself. Howie's result was generalized in a different direction by Kim [8], and it has also been considered in both a topological and a totally ordered setting (see [11] and [14] for brief summaries of this latter work). In addition, Magill [10] investigated the corresponding idea for endomorphisms of a Boolean ring, while J. A. Erdos [2] resolved the analogous problem for linear transformations of a finite–dimensional vector space.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document