Pipeline upheaval buckling in liquefiable soils

2013 ◽  
pp. 501-507
Author(s):  
E Williams ◽  
B Byrne ◽  
A Blakeborough
Keyword(s):  
Upheaval Buckling

Upheaval buckling of in-service cased insulated flowline

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 706-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianfeng Zhao ◽  
Menglan Duan
Keyword(s):  
Upheaval Buckling

In-Place FE Modeling of Unbonded Flexible Pipelines Capturing Pressure Stiffening and Decoupled Axial/Nonlinear Bending Stiffness

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edvin Hanken ◽  
Evelyn R. Hollingsworth ◽  
Lars S. Fagerland
Keyword(s):  
Water Injection ◽  
Bending Stiffness ◽  
Axial Stiffness ◽  
Fe Model ◽  
Nonlinear Bending ◽  
Upheaval Buckling ◽  
History Effects ◽  
System Integrity ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
Bending Behaviour

For fast track pipeline projects the need for costly installation vessels and sophisticated materials for rigid pipeline water injection systems, have made flexible pipelines a competitive alternative. They can be installed with less costly construction vessels, provide a competitive lead time and a corrosion resistant compliant material. Flexible pipelines have relative high axial stiffness and low non-linear bending stiffness which is a challenge to model correctly with FE for in-place analyses of pipelines. Whilst some FE programs can model the non-linear bending behaviour of a flexible pipeline at a given pressure, current FE tools do not include the effect of increased bending resistance as the system is pressurized. Therefore, a 3D FE model in ANSYS was developed to simulate the decoupled axial and nonlinear bending behaviour of a flexible, including the bend stiffening effect for increasing pressure. A description of the model is given in this paper. It will be demonstrated how the FE model can be used to simulate the 3D nonlinear catenary behaviour of an high pressure flexible pipeline tied into a manifold during pressurization. Due to high manifold hub loads during pressurization it is essential that such a model is capable of capturing all effects during pressurization to achieve an acceptable confidence level of the system integrity. It is also described how the FE model is used for upheaval buckling design, capturing non-linearities and load history effects that can reduce the conservatism in the design.

Design and Construction Challenges of a Roped Insulated Pipeline

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neetu Prasad ◽  
Graeme King ◽  
Arfeen Najeeb
Keyword(s):  
Ground Surface ◽  
Large Temperature ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
Oil Pipeline ◽  
Upheaval Buckling ◽  
Timely Completion ◽  
Construction Contractor ◽  
Cold Bends ◽  
And Control ◽  
Design And Construction

Abstract Thermally insulated hot buried pipelines pose a unique set of challenges. This paper discusses those challenges and how they were met during design and construction of the 150 km long Husky LLB Direct Pipeline, the longest thermally insulated oil pipeline in Canada. Thermal insulation materials are soft and can be easily damaged during construction and backfilling, and by large restraining forces at bends when the pipeline is operating at high temperatures. The large temperature difference between pipeline installation temperature and maximum operating temperature leads to large axial compressive forces that can cause movement at bends, crush insulation, increase temperatures at ground surface, cause loss of restraint, and in the worst case, lead to upheaval buckling and loss of containment. Special design and construction features to deal with these challenges, including insulation specifications, insulation of pipe bends, pipeline pre-straining, long radius bends, deeper burial, and pipeline roping, were therefore necessary. After pipe has been insulated with polyurethane foam it cannot be bent in standard field bending machines used for uninsulated pipes because the foam is too soft. The induction bends and cold bends that are shop insulated after bending are expensive. The Project minimized the number of these expensive insulated bends by using an engineered ditch bottom profile. This meant that shop bends were only needed to reduce excavation depth at sharp changes in ground surface elevation where the roped profile required excessive grading. Care was therefore necessary in the selection and development of specifications for the insulation system and shop fabricated bends, and to design and construct a ditch profile to minimize forces on the insulation and control upheaval buckling. Close co-ordination with vendors and the construction contractor was crucial for a successful and timely completion.

Influence of Wave-Induced Uplift Forces on Upheaval Buckling of Pipelines Buried in Sandy Seabeds

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Suresh Kumar ◽  
D. Achani ◽  
M. R. Sunny ◽  
T. Sahoo
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Waves ◽  
Shallow Waters ◽  
Burial Depth ◽  
Theoretical Studies ◽  
Wave Loads ◽  
Upheaval Buckling ◽  
Consolidation Model ◽  
Wave Induced ◽  
Uplift Forces ◽  
Experimental And Theoretical Studies

This study focuses on the buckling of pipelines in shallow waters subjected to surface gravity waves. The wave-induced uplift forces on pipelines buried in sandy seabeds are investigated using Biot's consolidation model. Empathetic imperfection model proposed by Taylor and Tran (1994, “Experimental and Theoretical Studies in Subsea Pipeline Buckling," Mar. Struct., 9(2), pp. 211–257.) is used for the study. Thereafter, buckling analyses are performed on the pipeline with the combined temperature and the wave-induced loads. The differences in the critical buckling temperatures for the pipe with consideration of wave loads are analyzed within a range of sea states. The influence of wave loads is found significant for low burial depth ratios.

Comparative Review of the Established UHB Assessment Methods for Offshore Pipelines

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sajith Kumar ◽  
Daniel Smith ◽  
Hooman Jafari
Keyword(s):  
Survey Data ◽  
Structural Reliability ◽  
Load Resistance ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Operational Parameters ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Upheaval Buckling ◽  
Variation Of Parameters ◽  
Comparative Review ◽  
Load And Resistance Factors

Out of straightness upheaval buckling (OOS UHB) assessment considers the pipeline design and operational parameters, post-lay survey data and the properties of back-fill and rock in order to determine load and resistance factors that are applied. The factors allow for the natural variation of all parameters and are ultimately used to determine the download requirements along the route of a pipeline that is susceptible to UHB. Two methods are most commonly used in OOS UHB assessments. The structural reliability analysis (SRA) method is the most established and explicitly considers the variation of parameters in a Monte-Carlo simulation, enabling load and resistance factors to be calculated with a defined reliability level. A more recently developed methodology is documented in DNV-RP-F110 and provides a unified approach to the calculation of safety factors. The approach was calibrated using structural reliability based methods, undertaken with target reliability levels that are compliant with DNV-OS-F101. This paper presents a review of two key components of OOS UHB assessments. These components are the accuracy of post-lay survey data and the load resistance factor calculation method. These components are reviewed in the context of SRA and DNV-RP-F110 based assessments for a range of pipeline sizes, and ranges of soil and operational parameters. This enables characterisation of the differences between the two methodologies for ranges of design parameters that represent the majority of in-field flowlines that are installed in the United kingdom Continental Shelf (UKCS). SRA and DNV-RP-F110 derived load and resistance factors are compared and the effect of survey data smoothing upon rock-dump requirements is also discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document