Amount of labour of water conduit repair

2013 ◽  
pp. 2081-2084 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Studziński
Keyword(s):  
Conduit Repair

Successful conduit repair using aortic homograft in a jehovah's witness child

1996 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 590-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kagami Miyaji ◽  
Akira Furuse ◽  
Makoto Takeda ◽  
Masahide Chikada ◽  
Minoru Ono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Jehovah’S Witness ◽  
Jehovah's Witness ◽  
Aortic Homograft ◽  
Conduit Repair

scholarly journals Sensory Outcomes in Digital Nerve Repair Techniques: An Updated Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Hand ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-164
Author(s):  
Zachary J. Herman ◽  
Asif M. Ilyas
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Surgical Management ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Nerve Repair ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Digital Nerve ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Conduit Repair ◽  
Repair Techniques

Background: Injuries to digital nerves are common with trauma to the hand, often requiring surgery. Surgical management of these injuries can be performed using several techniques: direct repair (neurorrhaphy), autograft, allograft, and conduit repair. In light of increasing the availability and use of various digital nerve repair techniques, a new systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to comparatively review the available evidence to determine any differences in outcomes to better guide treatment in cases with digital nerve gaps. Methods: Current literature on sensory outcomes of various digital nerve repair techniques was reviewed using static 2-point discrimination (S2PD), moving 2-point discrimination (M2PD), Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing (SWMF), and complication rates as outcomes of interest. After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 15 articles were reviewed and 625 nerve repairs were analyzed. Results: The average gap length for allograft repair, autograft repair, and conduit repair was 15.4, 24.7, and 13.4 mm, respectively. For S2PD outcomes, autograft repair was statistically superior to all other forms of repair. Allograft trended higher than neurorrhaphy and conduit repair, but results were not statistically significant. For SWMF outcomes, autograft repair was statistically superior to conduit repair and neurorrhaphy; it was statistically comparable with allograft repair. Allograft performed statistically superior to conduit repair relative to M2PD. Conclusions: Based on the current updated meta-analysis using newer data and techniques, we found that all available techniques have reasonable outcomes. Yet when managing a digital nerve injury with a gap, thereby excluding direct neurorrhaphy, both autograft and allograft performed comparably and were superior to conduit repair.

Erratum to: Post-RV-PA Conduit Repair

2017 ◽  
pp. E1-E1
Author(s):  
Yutaka Imoto ◽  
Tomoyuki Matsuba ◽  
Hideaki Kanda ◽  
Yoshiya Shigehisa
Keyword(s):  
Conduit Repair

Valved homograft conduit repair of the right heart in early infancy

1999 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 542-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Perron ◽  
Adrian M Moran ◽  
Kimberlee Gauvreau ◽  
Pedro J del Nido ◽  
John E Mayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Infancy ◽  
Right Heart ◽  
The Right ◽  
Conduit Repair

Right ventricular outflow tract after non-conduit repair of tetralogy of Fallot with coronary anomaly

2000 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 723-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Kalra ◽  
Rajesh Sharma ◽  
Shiv Kumar Choudhary ◽  
Balram Airan ◽  
Anil Bhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Tetralogy Of Fallot ◽  
Right Ventricular Outflow Tract ◽  
Ventricular Outflow Tract ◽  
Outflow Tract ◽  
Coronary Anomaly ◽  
Conduit Repair
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document