Metastable Phase Selection and Low-Temperature Plasticity in Chemically Synthesized Amorphous Al2O3–ZrO2 and Al2O3–Y2O3

2014 ◽  
pp. 141-178
2014 ◽  
pp. 115-151
Author(s):  
Ashutosh Gandhi ◽  
Arindam Paul ◽  
Shailendra Shekhawat ◽  
Umesh Waghmare ◽  
Vikram Jayaram

1995 ◽  
Vol 398 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Perepezko ◽  
D. R. Allen

ABSTRACTMost alloy systems can develop more than one solid phase for a given composition during solidification. For metastable undercooled liquids a thermodynamic analysis can provide insight into the range of structural and compositional options that are possible. The numerous examples of metastable phase formation during solidification of undercooled melts demonstrates that the actual phase selection is dominated by kinetics. Indeed, the observation of undercooling is linked to kinetic control. Different forms of kinetic control can be identified and include suppression of heterogeneous nucleation during slow cooling and constrained growth during rapid quenching. In both cases the kinetic competition involved in phase selection is mediated by the thermal history. Nucleation controlled kinetics can be examined in fine powders of undercooled liquids where crystallization rates and metastable phase diagrams provide a basis for analysis. Similarly, constrained growth can be examined during controlled cooling where microstructures and kinetic models can be used for analysis. The existing kinetics models appear to be adequate but the processing conditions are often dynamic and in nonsteady state conditions so that critical tests are difficult unless specific kinetic transitions are available.


2005 ◽  
Vol 88 (10) ◽  
pp. 2696-2701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nithyanantham Thangamani ◽  
Ashutosh S. Gandhi ◽  
Vikram Jayaram ◽  
Atul H. Chokshi

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 046503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imene Lamiri ◽  
Mohammed S M Abdelbaky ◽  
Djamel Hamana ◽  
Santiago García-Granda

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1133-1140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Quintero ◽  
Patrice Gergaud ◽  
Joris Aubin ◽  
Jean-Michel Hartmann ◽  
Vincent Reboud ◽  
...  

The Ni/Ge0.9Sn0.1 solid-state reaction was monitored by combining in situ X-ray diffraction, in-plane reciprocal space map measurements and in-plane pole figures. A sequential growth was shown, in which the first phase formed was an Ni-rich phase. Then, at 518 K, the mono-stanogermanide phase Ni(Ge0.9Sn0.1) was observed. This phase was stable up to 873 K. Special attention has been given to the nature and the crystallographic orientation of the Ni-rich phase obtained at low temperature. It is demonstrated, with in-plane pole figure measurements and simulation, that it was the ∊-Ni5(Ge0.9Sn0.1)3 metastable phase with a hexagonal structure.


2001 ◽  
Vol 304-306 ◽  
pp. 612-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Sha ◽  
Keyna O’Reilly ◽  
Brian Cantor ◽  
John Worth ◽  
Richard Hamerton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document