Non-invasive Screening Tests

2005 ◽  
pp. 398-414
Keyword(s):  
Screening Tests ◽  
Non Invasive

scholarly journals PCR vs karyotype for CVS and amniocentesis—the experience at one tertiary fetal medicine unit

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Finnegan ◽  
Suzanne Smyth ◽  
Orla Smith ◽  
Karen Flood ◽  
Jane Dalrymple ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Pregnancy Termination ◽  
Normal Pregnancy ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Fetal Medicine ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Fetal Aneuploidy ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Normal Ultrasound ◽  
Fetal Karyotype

Abstract Purpose Despite the rise of non-invasive screening tests for fetal aneuploidy, invasive testing during pregnancy remains the definitive diagnostic tool for fetal genetic anomalies. Results are rapidly available with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, but cases have been reported whereby initial results were not confirmed after pregnancy termination and the fetal karyotype was ultimately normal. We sought to examine the potential discordance between PCR and karyotype for fetal aneuploidy. Methods The results from all amniocentesis and CVS tests performed over a 6-year period in a large tertiary level fetal medicine unit were reviewed. The results of PCR and karyotype were recorded and discrepancies examined. Pregnancy outcomes were also recorded. Results A total of 1222 invasive tests were performed (716 amniocentesis and 506 CVS). Within the cohort having amniocentesis, 11 had discrepant results (normal QF-PCR result but with a subsequent abnormal karyotype). There was 1 case among this group which QF-PCR should have identified. Within the CVS group, 7 patients had discrepant results. All had a diploid QF-PCR and would not have been identified as abnormal by it. Conclusion PCR can be reliably used to determine aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, and 21. However, in cases of sex chromosome aneuploidy, its performance is less reliable and warrants waiting for a complete karyotype. Given such discordance, we advise waiting for karyotype for all invasive tests performed in the presence of a normal ultrasound before advising a patient of a diploid QF-PCR result or potentially terminating a normal pregnancy.

scholarly journals Assessment of a change of protocol of prenatal screening by inclusion of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocío Cabra-Rodríguez ◽  
Guadalupe Bueno Rodríguez ◽  
Cristina Santos Rosa ◽  
Miguel Ángel Castaño López ◽  
Sonia Delgado Muñoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Maternal Blood ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Loss To Follow Up ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Second Trimester Screening ◽  
Trimester Screening

AbstractObjectivesNon-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is a test for the detection of major fetal chromosomal abnormalities in maternal blood during pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of NIPS implemented within the framework of the Screening Program for Congenital Abnormalities of the Andalusian Health System.MethodsA retrospective observational study was undertaken to determine the number of NIPS tests performed since its introduction. The number of invasive diagnostic tests done after the implementation of NIPS in the patients included in the program between March 2016 and August 2017 was also quantified.ResultsA total of 6,258 combined first- and second trimester screening tests were performed, covering 95% of the population. In total, 250 subjects were identified as high risk, of whom 200 underwent NIPS after loss to follow-up. NIPS showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 76.84–100%) and a specificity of 99.46% (95% CI: 97.04–99.99%).ConclusionsThis test has proven to have a very high sensitivity and specificity. The results obtained demonstrate that the incorporation of NIPS in clinical practice minimizes the rate of miscarriages and reduces the frequency of invasive procedures by 70%.

scholarly journals Multianalyte Tests for the Early Detection of Cancer: Speedbumps and Barriers

2007 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 117727190700200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Tainsky ◽  
Madhumita Chatterjee ◽  
Nancy K. Levin ◽  
Sorin Draghici ◽  
Judith Abrams
Keyword(s):  
Early Detection ◽  
Tumor Antigens ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Clinical Intervention ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Molecular Event ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
In Vitro Diagnostic

It has become very clear that a single molecular event is inadequate to accurately predict the biology (or pathophysiology) of cancer. Furthermore, using any single molecular event as a biomarker for the early detection of malignancy may not comprehensively identify the majority of individuals with that disease. Therefore, the fact that technologies have arisen that can simultaneously detect several, possibly hundreds, of biomarkers has propelled the field towards the development of multianalyte-based in vitro diagnostic early detection tests for cancer using body fluids such as serum, plasma, sputum, saliva, or urine. These multianalyte tests may be based on the detection of serum autoantibodies to tumor antigens, the presence of cancer-related proteins in serum, or the presence of tumor-specific genomic changes that appear in plasma as free DNA. The implementation of non-invasive diagnostic approaches to detect early stage cancer may provide the physician with evidence of cancer, but the question arises as to how the information will affect the pathway of clinical intervention. The confirmation of a positive result from an in vitro diagnostic cancer test may involve relatively invasive procedures to establish a true cancer diagnosis. If in vitro diagnostic tests are proven to be both specific, i.e. rarely produce false positive results due to unrelated conditions, and sufficiently sensitive, i.e. rarely produce false negative results, then such screening tests offer the potential for early detection and personalized therapeutics using multiple disease-related targets with convenient and non-invasive means. Here we discuss the technical and regulatory barriers inherent in development of clinical multianalyte biomarker assays.

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): limitations on the way to become diagnosis

Diagnosis ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioanna Kotsopoulou ◽  
Panagiota Tsoplou ◽  
Konstantinos Mavrommatis ◽  
Christos Kroupis
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Testing ◽  
Maternal Plasma ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Positive Finding ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Cell Free Fetal Dna ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs ◽  
Near Future

AbstractWith the discovery of existing circulating cell-free fetal DNA (ccffDNA) in maternal plasma and the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, there is substantial hope that prenatal diagnosis will become a predominately non-invasive process in the future. At the moment, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is available for high-risk pregnancies with significant better sensitivity and specificity than the other existing non-invasive methods (biochemical and ultrasonographical). Mainly it is performed by NGS methods in a few commercial labs worldwide. However, it is expected that many other labs will offer analogous services in the future in this fast-growing field with a multiplicity of in-house methods (e.g., epigenetic, etc.). Due to various limitations of the available methods and technologies that are explained in detail in this manuscript, NIPT has not become diagnostic yet and women may still need to undergo risky invasive procedures to verify a positive finding or to secure (or even expand) a negative one. Efforts have already started to make the NIPT technologies more accurate (even at the level of a complete fetal genome) and cheaper and thus more affordable, in order to become diagnostic screening tests for all pregnancies in the near future.

An Evaluation of Impedance Plethysmography and 125I-Fibrinogen Leg Scanning in Patients following Hip Surgery

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (03) ◽  
pp. 830-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
M K Cruickshank ◽  
M N Levine ◽  
J Hirsh ◽  
A G G Turpie ◽  
P Powers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Patient Management ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Impedance Plethysmography ◽  
Hip Surgery ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Combined Use

SummaryVenous thromboembolism is a common post-operative complication in patients following hip surgery. 125I-fibrinogen leg scanning and impedance plethysmography (IPG), are often used in the detection of venous thrombi in such patients. Information on the sensitivity and specificity of these non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis following hip surgery is relevant for both patient management and for choosing the appropriate outcome measure for clinical trials evaluating new prophylactic regimens.We determined the sensitivity and specificity of the IPG alone, the 125I-fibrinogen leg scan alone, as well as the combined use of the two tests from a retrospective analysis of 685 hip surgery patients who participated in clinical trials of anti-thrombotic prophylaxis. These patients were followed prospectively with non-invasive tests. Bilateral venography was attempted either when one or both screening tests became positive or on day 10-14 post-operatively if both screening tests remained negative. Adequate venography was obtained in 1,010 (73.7%) legs and thrombi were identified in 198 (19.6%) legs.The sensitivities of the IPG and leg scanning were 12.9% and 44.6% respectively; the corresponding specificities were 98.1% and 95.0%. The sensitivity of a positive result on one or both screening tests was 49.6% with a specificity of 93.9%.Therefore, leg scanning and IPG, even in combination, are not sufficiently accurate to be recommended as the only strategy for the diagnosis of venous thrombosis following hip surgery. Venography should be considered in all patients undergoing surveillance testing either when one or both of the screening tests become positive or on day 10-14 if the screening tests remain negative.

Application of Viscosity Volume Screening Tool as a screening tool in swallowing disorders diagnosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 6-10
Author(s):  
Barbara Jamróz ◽  
Magdalena Milewska ◽  
Pere Clave ◽  
Joanna Chmielewska
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Treatment Cost ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Swallowing Disorders ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Instrumental Methods

It is commonly known that dysphagia is associated with primary (malnutrition, dehydration, aspiration pneumonia) as well as secondary consequences (longer hospital stay, increased treatment cost, higher risk of mortality). Therefore screening tests in swallowing disorders, especially at risk groups are essential. The aim of screening is identification of patients at risk of dysphagia and referring patient to further instrumental methods. Test should be non invasive, quick, easy to perform by medical staff, with highest sensitivity and specifity. One of the test is Viscosity – Volume Screening Test (VVST) with 3 different consistencies at 3 volumes (5, 10 and 20 ml), what wider possibilities of these tool in safe consistency and volume indication.

Non-invasive prenatal diagnostics of aneuploidy using next-generation DNA sequencing technologies, and clinical considerations

2013 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yana N. Nepomnyashchaya ◽  
Artem V. Artemov ◽  
Sergey A. Roumiantsev ◽  
Alexander G. Roumyantsev ◽  
Alex Zhavoronkov
Keyword(s):  
Dna Sequencing ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Diagnostic Algorithm ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Cell Free Fetal Dna ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Fetal Aneuploidies

AbstractRapidly developing next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies produce a large amount of data across the whole human genome and allow a large number of DNA samples to be analyzed simultaneously. Screening cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) obtained from maternal blood using NGS technologies has provided new opportunities for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) of fetal aneuploidies. One of the major challenges to the analysis of fetal abnormalities is the development of accurate and reliable algorithms capable of analyzing large numbers of short sequence reads. Several such algorithms have recently been developed. Here, we provide a review of recent NGS-based NIPD methods as well as the available algorithms for short-read sequence analysis. We furthermore introduce the practical application of these algorithms for the detection of different types of fetal aneuploidies, and compare the performance, cost and complexity of each approach for clinical deployment. Our review identifies several main technologies and trends in NGS-based NIPD. The main considerations for clinical development for NIPD and screening tests using DNA sequencing are: accuracy, intellectual property, cost and the ability to screen for a wide range of chromosomal abnormalities and genetic defects. The cost of the diagnostic test depends on the sequencing method, diagnostic algorithm and volume of the tests. If the cost of sequencing equipment and reagents remains at or around current levels, targeted approaches for sequencing-based aneuploidy testing and SNP-based methods are preferred.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document