scholarly journals Management of genital prolapse

2006 ◽  
pp. 183-196
Keyword(s):  
GYNECOLOGY ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.A. Ishchenko ◽  
A.I. Ishchenko ◽  
I.V. Shulchina ◽  
A.I. Muravlev

GYNECOLOGY ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L Khanzadyan ◽  
V.E. Radzinskiy ◽  
T.A. Demura ◽  
A.V. Donnikov

GYNECOLOGY ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 24-26
Author(s):  
Gennady Y Yarin ◽  
Inna A Vilgelmi ◽  
Evgeny V Liuft

Background. Pelvic organ prolapse is one of the most common women's diseases worldwide. Genital prolapse incidence among women over 50 is on average 41%. There are variety methods for genital prolapse treatment; they are divided into surgical and non-surgical ones. One of the conservative treatment methods is a use of pessaries. According to different studies an efficacy of pessary therapy is approximately 60%. Aim to estimate a safety and efficacy of genital prolapse conservative treatment with a cube pessary on the basis on standardized questionnaires. Outcomes and methods. In ANO “NRITO Clinic” Urology and Gynecology Center 26 women with various degree genital prolapse were treated with pessary within the period from August 2015 to March 2016. Efficacy of pessaries use, patient satisfaction with this treatment method and complications rate were estimated. Results. Urogynecological cube pessary use in a treatment of various types of genital prolapse is quite an effective method (p


1974 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 528-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos E. Azpuru

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Paul Roovers ◽  
Anske van der Bom ◽  
Jules Schagen van Leeuwen ◽  
Piet Scholten ◽  
Peter Heintz ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. CMRH.S10804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shakuntala Chhabra ◽  
Manjiri Ramteke ◽  
Sonali Mehta ◽  
Nisha Bhole ◽  
Yojna Yadav

The present study was conducted to investigate the trends of vaginal hysterectomy for genital prolapse in last 20 years by analyzing case records of affected women. During the analysis period, 4831 women underwent hysterectomy; records of 4223 (87.5%) were available. Of these, 911 (21.6%), 2.7% of 34,080 gynecological admissions, had vaginal hysterectomy for genital prolapse (study subjects). Eighty percent women who had vaginal hysterectomy for genital prolapse were over 40 years of age; however, most of these women had had the disorder for years before they presented. Only 4 (0.4%) women had not given birth, 874 (96%) women had had two or more births, and 383 (42%) had had 5 or more births. Having given birth was the major factor responsible for genital prolapse. In all, 94.2% of women presented with something coming out of the vagina.” Some women presented with abnormal vaginal bleeding or pain in abdomen as the chief complaint although they had had uterovaginal prolapse for years. There was no mortality and morbidity decreased over the years. There has been no change in the rate of vaginal hysterectomy for genital prolapse over the years. Surgical morbidity decreased trend, possibly because of the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative precautions taken, especially preoperative treatment of urinary and genital tract infection. Attempts need to be made to have safe births and a healthy life style so as to prevent genital prolapse and in case it occurs, therapy to prevent progression so that major interventions like hysterectomy are averted. Meticulous preoperative evaluation and planned therapy help in reducing surgical morbidity, if surgery becomes essential.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document