Multi-component early intervention – models of good practice

Author(s):  
Nikki Brouwers

Early intervention of the biopsychosocial model as a framework to achieve sustainable employment outcomes following injury, illness or disease is well documented in the International research. However in some areas of disability management the term early intervention is consistently applied exclusively within the medical model with early access to treatment and diagnostic tools.However in Australia, whilst the knowledge of the Health benefits of work consensus statement is gaining traction, we remain lagging in effective implementation of early intervention models of the biopsychosocial model to return to work and return to life. This paper explores the structural challenges associated with successful implementation of the model and provides International learnings and applications for consideration and adaption to the Australian context. Further this paper will provide learnings from a pilot program being run in NSW that has been successful in the early triage and referral into a structured Return to Work program that is achieving strong results.


Author(s):  
Heather E. Baldwin ◽  
B. Heidi Ellis

Special populations have unique issues that need to be considered in the development and delivery of prevention and early intervention models. For these individuals, social context or stressors and support within their social environments may be particularly critical to consider in the wake of a traumatic exposure. In this chapter, we will discuss some of the environmental factors that are important to consider when planning and implementing prevention and early intervention programs for special populations and explore these factors in the case of refugee children.


Author(s):  
Friedrich Mehrhoff

The Guidelines on Return to Work and Reintegration of the International Social Security Association (ISSA) in Geneva published 2013 provides key-elements for successful disability management programs worldwide: Early intervention, personal-centred, work-place orientated, holistic-driven and multi-disciplined approach. Lots of tools and good practice from various countries and stakeholders in prevention and rehabilitation support the efforts of retaining and restore the employability of persons with disabilities within societies. The lecture offers an overview of the ISSA Guidelines and how they could be used as standard in social security institutions.


2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Mike C Boyes ◽  
Joseph P Hornick ◽  
Nancy Ogden

<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-layout-grid-align: none;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span lang="EN-US">In examining the role of early intervention in children&rsquo;s social development, the authors discuss the results of five broad-based intervention programs based on the Healthy Families model originated in the State of Hawaii. These programs were directed toward families at moderate levels of risk when dealing with the arrival their first child and were situated in Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Whitehorse, Yukon, and at three sites in Edmonton, Alberta. The authors state that their experiences with this project have led them to question a number of traditional assumptions regarding past theory and research in this area as it pertains to crime prevention. More specifically, they </span><span style="mso-fareast-font-family: 'MS Mincho';" lang="EN-US">discuss how the developmental model helped to identify the various developmental pathways of positive change that were being demonstrated by families in the Healthy Families Program sites. They agree with other researchers that </span><span lang="EN-US">early childhood intervention is viewed most appropriately as an individualized strategy and not as a developmental panacea.</span></span></span></p>


Autism ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 136236132110661
Author(s):  
Stephanie Y Shire ◽  
Wendy Shih ◽  
Terri Barriault ◽  
Connie Kasari

Although a growing number of caregiver-mediated intervention models for families with children with autism are being examined in efficacy trials, few have been transferred to community implementation. Furthermore, little testing has explored implementation strategies to support caregivers’ strategy use with their children. In partnership with a publicly funded intervention agency in Canada, this pilot project explored intervention implementation strategies and follow-up supports. Dyads were randomized at entry to coaching or observe then add coaching and at intervention exit to individual or group follow-up booster. The caregiver-mediated Joint Attention, Symbolic Play, Engagement and Regulation intervention was provided by agency staff to a diverse community sample of families with young children awaiting or diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Independent agency staff delivered assessments and recorded a caregiver–child interaction. Blinded raters scored children’s initiations of joint attention, play actions, joint engagement, and caregivers’ strategy implementation. Practitioners implemented the intervention and coaching strategies well ( M = 83%). Overall, caregivers made significant gains in strategy use and children showed significant growth in joint engagement, play diversity, and joint attention across conditions through public caregiver-mediated intervention services. Caregivers’ strategy use supported gains in children’s joint engagement. Lay abstract The next step for communication interventions for young children with autism include coaching/teaching for caregivers that have been tested in university clinics and testing these interventions in real world systems with early intervention providers who serve children and families in their communities. However, there are few projects that have tested how well the intervention can be transferred to community providers and what types of progress children and caregivers make in these services. This project took place in partnership with a community early intervention agency in the province of Ontario, Canada. The agency provided government-funded public health services. The agency was funded to take part in a pilot program to try out one of four early intervention models that included coaching for caregivers and was designed to support children’s social engagement, play, and communication skills. The team decided to test two ways to start the intervention: (a) begin with observation of the practitioner for 4 weeks and then start coached practice with the child and (b) start coaching immediately. The team also tested two ways to support families for 3 months after intervention: (a) group booster sessions and (b) individual visits. The practitioners delivered the intervention well ( M = 83%), and overall, caregivers and children made significant gains by the end of intervention in both observation + coaching and coaching. Attendance for follow-up boosters was variable with fewer families attending groups. More research is needed to test different strategies and roles to individualize interventions for caregivers with a range of goals and learning styles.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Corsico ◽  
Michelle Griffin-Doyle ◽  
Ilina Singh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document