Guidelines for courtroom testimony

Author(s):  
Phillip Resnick
Keyword(s):  
1967 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-321
Author(s):  
Lawrence Katz
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Silvan Niedermeier

Chapter two focuses on the Dave Canty case and the Daniels-Robinson case. The two cases shows how allegations of torture were dealt with during criminal proceedings and examines the means used by African American suspects to substantiate allegations of torture during their trials. Overall, this chapter examines the testimonies of African American defendants and the degree to which their statements were recognized by the courts of the South.


Author(s):  
Livia L. Gilstrap ◽  
Edie Greene
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Saykaly ◽  
Angela Crossman ◽  
Mary Morris ◽  
Victoria Talwar

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of question type (open-ended, prompted, reverse order and chronological order recall) on children’s ability to maintain a truth or a lie in a two-part mock-courtroom study. Design/methodology/approach – In total, 96 children (M age=131.00 months) between 9 and 12 years of age were asked to testify about an interaction with a research assistant the week prior. They were assigned to one of four conditions (true/false×assertion/denial). Findings – Results indicate that question type has an influence on children’s ability to maintain their condition. Results also indicate that regardless of question type, children have difficulty recalling information sequentially. Practical implications – Implications of the current research support the use of various question types, including increasing the cognitive load demands, when interviewing children. Originality/value – To date, this is the first study to investigate the use of reverse order questioning in a courtroom study with children.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document