Preoperative assessment

2011 ◽  
pp. 114-126
Keyword(s):  
Preoperative Assessment

Surgical Management of Patients With 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 857-869
Author(s):  
Oksana A. Jackson ◽  
Alison E. Kaye
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Management ◽  
Preoperative Evaluation ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
22Q11.2 Deletion Syndrome ◽  
Deletion Syndrome ◽  
22Q11.2 Deletion ◽  
Surgical Decision ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Spine Abnormalities ◽  
Speech Assessment

Purpose The purpose of this tutorial was to describe the surgical management of palate-related abnormalities associated with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Craniofacial differences in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome may include overt or occult clefting of the palate and/or lip along with oropharyngeal variances that may lead to velopharyngeal dysfunction. This chapter will describe these circumstances, including incidence, diagnosis, and indications for surgical intervention. Speech assessment and imaging of the velopharyngeal system will be discussed as it relates to preoperative evaluation and surgical decision making. Important for patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is appropriate preoperative screening to assess for internal carotid artery positioning, cervical spine abnormalities, and obstructive sleep apnea. Timing of surgery as well as different techniques, common complications, and outcomes will also be discussed. Conclusion Management of velopharyngeal dysfunction in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is challenging and requires thoughtful preoperative assessment and planning as well as a careful surgical technique.

Open Reduction for Dorsal Dislocation of Second to Fifth Carpometacarpal Joints: A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroo Kimura ◽  
Akira Toga ◽  
Taku Suzuki ◽  
Takuji Iwamoto
Keyword(s):  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Delayed Diagnosis ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Radiographic Examination ◽  
Clinical Images ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Carpometacarpal Joints ◽  
Joint Deformity ◽  
Poor Outcomes

Abstract Background Fracture-dislocations of all four ulnar (second to fifth) carpometacarpal (CMC) joints are rare hand injuries and frequently overlooked or missed. These injuries can be treated conservatively when closed reduction is successfully achieved, though they are sometimes irreducible and unstable. Case Description We report the case of a 17-year-old boy involved in a vehicular accident. Clinical images showed dorsal dislocation of all four ulnar CMC joints of the left hand associated with a fracture of the base of the fourth metacarpal. Although closed reduction was attempted immediately, the affected joints remained unstable and easily redislocated. Therefore, we performed open reduction and percutaneous fixation of all ulnar CMCs. He showed excellent recovery after 1 year postoperatively, reported no pain, and demonstrated complete grip strength and range of motion of the affected wrist and fingers. Literature Review Accurate clinical diagnosis of this lesion is difficult because of polytrauma, severe swelling masking the dislocated CMC joint deformity, and overlapping of adjacent metacarpals and carpal bones on radiographic examination. As for the treatment strategy, it has yet to obtain a consensus. Some reports value open reduction to guarantee anatomical reduction, and it is definitely needed in the patients with interposed tissues to be removed or with subacute and chronic injuries. Clinical Relevance Delayed diagnosis or treatment could lead to poor outcomes. Therefore, surgeons must be aware that precise preoperative assessment is critical, and anatomical open reduction of interposed bony fragments, like our case, may be required even in an acute phase.

Preoperative assessment of treatment planning on minimization of micro-movement during healing period of immediate-loaded implants using X-ray CT data-based simulation

2010 ◽  
pp. 110220121911010
Author(s):  
KATSUHIKO KIMURA ◽  
Yasumasa Fukase ◽  
Michiko Makino ◽  
Chihiro Masaki ◽  
Tetsuji Nakamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Healing Period ◽  
Ct Data

Protocols in Heart and Lung Transplantation: An Essential Guide to Preoperative Assessment and Timing to Improve Outcomes

2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
Victor Tapson ◽  
Robert Frantz ◽  
John Conte
Keyword(s):  
North Carolina ◽  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Lung Transplantation ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Assistant Professor ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
Johns Hopkins University ◽  
Duke University

This discussion was moderated by Victor Tapson, MD, Editor-in-Chief of Advances in Pulmonary Hypertension and Associate Professor, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. The participants included Robert Frantz, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and John Conte, MD, Associate Professor of Surgery and Director of Heart and Lung Transplantation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

Classifications and Clinical Assessment of Haemorrhoids:The Proctologist’s Corner

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arcangelo Picciariello ◽  
Petr Tsarkov ◽  
Vincenzo Papagni ◽  
Sergey Efetov ◽  
Daniel Markaryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Clinical Assessment ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Benign Condition ◽  
Haemorrhoidal Disease ◽  
Therapeutic Choice

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a benign condition affecting a considerable part of adult population. HD can be considered a social and economic burden with high impact on patient lifestyle. Several new techniques and devices have been proposed for HD treatment; however, preoperative assessment is essential and the use of classification system is recommended. METHODS: In the last two decades many studies described the preoperative assessment and several attempts of classification for HD. This review focuses on the most relevant studies found in literature where classification systems and clinical evaluation with differential diagnosis have been evaluated. RESULTS: The knowledge of classification systems and differential diagnosis for HD has been shown to play a central role in the clinical assessment and in the best treatment choice. Although there are new challenging techniques and devices for HD treatment, a preoperative assessment is always mandatory. CONCLUSION: Preoperative clinical evaluation is essential for HD patient treatment and outcome. Classification systems are useful for the therapeutic choice and for researches on new medical or surgical treatments. In fact, the international guidelines advise several therapeutic options depending on the severity of the HD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document