Impact of health status ('quality of life') issues in chronic lung disease

2005 ◽  
pp. 143-149
Author(s):  
Mauro Carone ◽  
Paul Jones
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Chronic Lung Disease ◽  
Life Issues

scholarly journals Minimal versus specialist equipment in the delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation: protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e047524
Author(s):  
Claire M Nolan ◽  
Jessica A Walsh ◽  
Suhani Patel ◽  
Ruth E Barker ◽  
Oliver Polgar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Exercise Capacity ◽  
Chronic Lung Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Rehabilitation ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Global Rating ◽  
Process Data ◽  
Exercise Equipment

IntroductionPulmonary rehabilitation (PR), an exercise and education programme for people with chronic lung disease, aims to improve exercise capacity, breathlessness and quality of life. Most evidence to support PR is from trials that use specialist exercise equipment, for example, treadmills (PR-gym). However, a significant proportion of programmes do not have access to specialist equipment with training completed with minimal exercise equipment (PR-min). There is a paucity of robust literature examining the efficacy of supervised, centre-based PR-min. We aim to determine whether an 8-week supervised, centre-based PR-min programme is non-inferior to a standard 8-week supervised, centre-based PR-gym programme in terms of exercise capacity and health outcomes for patients with chronic lung disease.Methods and analysisParallel, two-group, assessor-blinded and statistician-blinded, non-inferiority randomised trial. 436 participants will be randomised using minimisation at the individual level with a 1:1 allocation to PR-min (intervention) or PR-gym (control). Assessment will take place pre-PR (visit 1), post-PR (visit 2) and 12 months following visit 1 (visit 3). Exercise capacity (incremental shuttle walk test), dyspnoea (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ)-Dyspnoea), health-related quality of life (CRQ), frailty (Short Physical Performance Battery), muscle strength (isometric quadriceps maximum voluntary contraction), patient satisfaction (Global Rating of Change Questionnaire), health economic as well as safety and trial process data will be measured. The primary outcome is change in exercise capacity between visit 1 and visit 2. Two sample t-tests on an intention to treat basis will be used to estimate the difference in mean primary and secondary outcomes between patients randomised to PR-gym and PR-min.Ethics and disseminationLondon-Camden and Kings Cross Research Ethics Committee and Health Research Authority have approved the study (18/LO/0315). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals, presented at international conferences, disseminated through social media, patient and public routes and directly shared with stakeholders.Trial registration numberISRCTN16196765.

scholarly journals Quality of Life Measurements in Epilepsy

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (S2) ◽  
pp. S3-S5 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Chadwick
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Social Functioning ◽  
Seizure Control ◽  
Well Being ◽  
General Health Status ◽  
Life Issues ◽  
Disease Specific ◽  
Quality Of Life Measurements

ABSTRACT:In the treatment of the patient with epilepsy not only seizure control but quality of life issues are important aspects of management. Aspects that have an impact on the quality of life include seizure frequency and severity, social functioning, psychological well-being, disease specific measures, and general health status.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document