Growth and endocrine late effects

2004 ◽  
pp. 650-666
Author(s):  
W B. Wallace ◽  
Mark Brougham ◽  
Helen Spoudeas
Keyword(s):  
Late Effects

Radiopharmacology: Hazard or/and Benefit

1984 ◽  
Vol 23 (02) ◽  
pp. 87-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Flemming
Keyword(s):  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Late Effects ◽  
Radiation Risk ◽  
Dose Effect ◽  
Radiation Hazard ◽  
Radiation Doses ◽  
Low Doses ◽  
Medical Radiology ◽  
Experimental Findings ◽  
In The Beginning

SummaryIn the beginning of medical radiology, only the benefit of ionizing radiation was obvious, and radiation was handled and applied generously. After late effects had become known, the radiation exposure was reduced to doses following which no such effects were found. Thus, it was assumed that one could obtain an optimal medical benefit without inducing any hazard. Later, due to experimental findings, hypotheses arose (linear dose-effect response, no time factor) which led to the opinion that even low and lowest radiation doses were relevant for the induction of late effects. A radiation fear grew, which was unintentionally strengthened by radiation protection decrees: even for low doses a radiation risk could be calculated. Therefore, it was believed that there could still exist a radiation hazard, and the radiation benefit remained in question. If, however, all presently known facts are considered, one must conclude that large radiation doses are hazardous and low doses are inefficient, whereas lowest doses have a biopositive effect. Ionizing radiation, therefore, may cause both, hazard as well as benefit. Which of the two effects prevails is determined by the level of dose.

scholarly journals Childhood Leukemia, Late Effects, and a Person-centric Model of Follow-up

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (9) ◽  
pp. 880-881
Author(s):  
Miranda M Fidler-Benaoudia ◽  
Kevin C Oeffinger
Keyword(s):  
Late Effects ◽  
Childhood Leukemia

scholarly journals Late effects of cancer (treatment) and work ability: guidance by managers and professionals

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid G. Boelhouwer ◽  
Willemijn Vermeer ◽  
Tinka van Vuuren
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Work Ability ◽  
Late Effects ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Organisational Culture ◽  
Job Resources ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Cognitive Problems

Abstract Background The prevalence of the group of workers that had a cancer diagnosis in the past is growing. These workers may still be confronted with late effects of cancer (treatment) possibly affecting their work ability. As little is known about the guidance of this group, the aim of this study was to explore the experiences and ideas of managers and professionals about the guidance of these workers in the case of late effects of cancer (treatment). Given the positive associations with work ability of the job resources autonomy, social support by colleagues and an open organisational culture found in several quantitative studies, these job resources were also discussed. Further ideas about the influences of other factors and points of attention in the guidance of this group of workers were explored. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with managers (n = 11) and professionals (n = 47). Data-collection was from November 2019 to June 2020. The data were coded and analysed using directed content analyses. Results The late effects of cancer or cancer treatment discussed were physical problems, fatigue, cognitive problems, anxiety for cancer recurrence, and a different view of life. The self-employed have less options for guidance but may struggle with late effects affecting work ability in the same way as the salaried. Late effects may affect work ability and various approaches have been described. Autonomy, social support of colleagues and an open organisational culture were regarded as beneficial. It was indicated that interventions need to be tailor-made and created in dialogue with the worker. Conclusions Especially with respect to cognitive problems and fatigue, guidance sometimes turned out to be complicated. In general, the importance of psychological safety to be open about late effects that affect work ability was emphasized. Moreover, it is important to take the perspective of the worker as the starting point and explore the possibilities together with the worker. Autonomy is an important factor in general, and a factor that must always be monitored when adjustments in work are considered. There is a lot of experience, but there are still gaps in knowledge and opportunities for more knowledge sharing.

scholarly journals Potential late effects of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection: parallels to cancer late effects

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Richard P. Phipps ◽  
Patricia J. Sime ◽  
Connor R. Phipps
Keyword(s):  
Late Effects
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document