Fatigue evaluation of reinforced asphalt concrete slabs

2012 ◽  
pp. 151-158
Author(s):  
K Biligiri ◽  
S Said ◽  
H Hakim
Keyword(s):  
Asphalt Concrete ◽  
Concrete Slabs ◽  
Fatigue Evaluation

scholarly journals Ensuring adhesion between the asphalt-concrete road surface and rigid base at the roadbed design stage

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (7 (111)) ◽  
pp. 84-92
Author(s):  
Yevhen Dorozhko ◽  
Angelika Batrakova ◽  
Vladislav Tymoshevskyi ◽  
Elina Zakharova
Keyword(s):  
Adhesion Strength ◽  
Asphalt Concrete ◽  
Road Surface ◽  
Design Stage ◽  
Rigid Base ◽  
Concrete Slabs ◽  
Strained State ◽  
Cement Concrete ◽  
The Road ◽  
Concrete Layer

Arranging asphalt-concrete layers on a rigid base in the form of cement-concrete slabs can significantly improve the transporting and operational performance of the road surface. Such a structural solution is appropriate in almost all countries of the world since cement-concrete slabs retain high strength for a long time. To prevent the rapid destruction of an asphalt-concrete road surface on a rigid base, it is necessary to ensure reliable adhesion between the layers' contacts and, at the design stage, to test the adhesion strength by estimation. This paper has substantiated a criterion of adhesion strength in the contact between an asphalt-concrete road surface and the rigid base. The calculation involves comparing the active tangent stresses in the contact between layers dependent on the effect of the vertical and horizontal components of the transport load with the magnitude of permissible tangent shear stresses in the contact of layers. The parameters for an estimation model have been established; the stressed-strained state of the roadbed structure has been simulated using a finite element method. When modeling the stressed-strained state and calculating based on the strength criterion, different vehicle traffic conditions have been considered, as well as the effect of temperature on the strength parameters of the asphalt-concrete layer and the tar layer. The conditions for vehicle movement, taken into consideration when designing, correspond to the conditions of movement along the road, along the curves in the plan and profiles, and notion conditions at car emergency braking. Practical recommendations have been compiled for assigning the minimum permissible thickness of an asphalt-concrete layer on a rigid base, which must be followed at the design stage due to the condition for ensuring reliable adhesion between the layers' contacts. The minimum permissible thickness ranges from 2 cm to 10 cm, depending on the conditions of movement, temperature, and the type of tar.

Symptom Validity Testing

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 14-15
Author(s):  
Lee H. Ensalada
Keyword(s):  
Memory Deficits ◽  
Symptom Validity ◽  
Sensory Cues ◽  
Validity Testing ◽  
Symptom Validity Testing ◽  
Tunnel Vision ◽  
Blurry Vision ◽  
The Common ◽  
Fatigue Evaluation ◽  
Choice Testing

Abstract Symptom validity testing (SVT), also known as forced-choice testing, is a means of assessing the validity of sensory and memory deficits, including tactile anesthesias, paresthesias, blindness, color blindness, tunnel vision, blurry vision, and deafness. The common feature among these symptoms is a claimed inability to perceive or remember a sensory signal. SVT comprises two elements: a specific ability is assessed by presenting a large number of items in a multiple-choice format, and then the examinee's performance is compared to the statistical likelihood of success based on chance alone. These tests usually present two alternatives; thus the probability of simply guessing the correct response (equivalent to having no ability at all) is 50%. Thus, scores significantly below chance performance indicate that the sensory cues must have been perceived, but the examinee chose not to report the correct answer—alternative explanations are not apparent. SVT also has the capacity to demonstrate that the examinee performed below the probabilities of chance. Scoring below a norm can be explained by fatigue, evaluation anxiety, inattention, or limited intelligence. Scoring below the probabilities of chance alone most likely indicates deliberate deceptions and is evidence of malingering because it provides strong evidence that the examinee received the sensory cues and denied the perception. Even so, malingering must be evaluated from the total clinical context.

Impairment Questions and Answers

1999 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-4
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Validity ◽  
Validity Testing ◽  
Symptom Validity Testing ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Tunnel Vision ◽  
Questions And Answers ◽  
Blurry Vision ◽  
Fatigue Evaluation ◽  
Choice Testing ◽  
Rule Out

Abstract Symptom validity testing, also known as forced-choice testing, is a way to assess the validity of sensory and memory deficits, including tactile anesthesias, paresthesias, blindness, color blindness, tunnel vision, blurry vision, and deafness—the common feature of which is a claimed inability to perceive or remember a sensory signal. Symptom validity testing comprises two elements: A specific ability is assessed by presenting a large number of items in a multiple-choice format, and then the examinee's performance is compared with the statistical likelihood of success based on chance alone. Scoring below a norm can be explained in many different ways (eg, fatigue, evaluation anxiety, limited intelligence, and so on), but scoring below the probabilities of chance alone most likely indicates deliberate deception. The positive predictive value of the symptom validity technique likely is quite high because there is no alternative explanation to deliberate distortion when performance is below the probability of chance. The sensitivity of this technique is not likely to be good because, as with a thermometer, positive findings indicate that a problem is present, but negative results do not rule out a problem. Although a compelling conclusion is that the examinee who scores below probabilities is deliberately motivated to perform poorly, malingering must be concluded from the total clinical context.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document