Decision-Making Method of the Linguistic Comparison Matrix

2012 ◽  
pp. 105-138
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Comparison Matrix

scholarly journals Utilization of AHP-MAUT Method to Determine the Country of Exhibition Abroad in Batik Hatta Boutique

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (02) ◽  
pp. 52-56
Author(s):  
Saifur Rohman Cholil ◽  
Tria Ardianita
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Rank Correlation ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Hierarchical Level ◽  
Spearman Rank Correlation ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Pairwise Comparison Matrix ◽  
Spearman Rank ◽  
Comparison Matrix ◽  
A Value

This research was conducted with the aim of helping decide the destination country for overseas exhibitions at the Batik Hatta Boutique. By knowing all the data and information of a country, boutique owners can decide which country to visit in the batik exhibition. Because if you attend the cast in all countries, there will be overruns in costs. The methods used are AHP and MAUT. The AHP method is used as a weighting using a linguistic value scale. Weights are obtained from the pairwise comparison matrix between two elements of all elements that occur at the same hierarchical level. The MAUT method is used to determine the importance of each alternative for the ranking process. The results of this study indicate that Cambodia was chosen as the location to be visited for the batik exhibition. The results of the validation using the Spearman Rank correlation comparison obtained a value of 0.951 meaning that this method can be used as a decision making.

scholarly journals A Discussion on “Pythagorean fuzzy AHP based risk assessment methodology for hazardous material transportation: an application in Istanbul”

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahid Bhat ◽  
Akanksha Singh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Hazardous Material ◽  
Pairwise Comparison Matrix ◽  
Comparison Matrix ◽  
Hazardous Material Transportation ◽  
Material Transportation

Abstract Ayyildiz et al. (Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2021), 1-13) pointed out that it is important to identify and minimize the critical risks in the transportation of hazardous material. For the same, Ayyildiz et al. proposed an effective integrated decision-making methodology by combining the Modified Delphi Method (MDM) and Pythagorean fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (PF-AHP). In this integrated methodology, PF-AHP method is utilized to obtain weights of main and sub-risk factors in order to rank these factors. In Step 5 of PF-AHP method an interval valued Pythagorean fuzzy pairwise comparison matrix is transformed into a crisp matrix and then crisp AHP is applied to obtain the normalized weights from the transformed crisp matrix. It is quite evident that the crisp AHP is used only for crisp pairwise comparison matrix. However, after a deep study, it is observed that the transformed crisp matrix, obtained on applying the steps of Ayyildiz et al. methodology, violates the reciprocal propriety of pairwise comparison matrix. Therefore, to apply crisp AHP on the transformed crisp matrix is mathematically incorrect and will lead to problematic decision-making approach. Hence, may result in a heavy loss in any value-added model such as hazardous material transportation problems. Therefore, the Ayyildiz et al. methodology is not valid in its present form and cannot be used to find the solution of such type of real-life problem. Keeping the same in mind, the focus of this discussion is to make the researchers aware about these mathematical incorrect assumptions and the necessary modification is suggested.

scholarly journals PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRIX IN MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 738-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang KOU ◽  
Daji ERGU ◽  
Yang CHEN ◽  
Changsheng LIN
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Measurement Scales ◽  
Pairwise Comparison Matrix ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Comparison Matrix ◽  
Comprehensive Literature Review

The measurement scales, consistency index, inconsistency issues, missing judgment estimation and priority derivation methods have been extensively studied in the pairwise comparison matrix (PCM). Various approaches have been proposed to handle these problems, and made great contributions to the decision making. This paper reviews the literature of the main developments of the PCM. There are plenty of literature related to these issues, thus we mainly focus on the literature published in 37 peer reviewed international journals from 2010 to 2015 (searched via ISI Web of science). We attempt to analyze and classify these literatures so as to find the current hot research topics and research techniques in the PCM, and point out the future directions on the PCM. It is hoped that this paper will provide a comprehensive literature review on PCM, and act as informative summary of the main developments of the PCM for the researchers for their future research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document