The Application of Medium-Resolution MERIS Satellite Data for Continental Land-Cover Mapping over South America: Results and Caveats

2016 ◽  
pp. 346-359 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
South America ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Satellite Data ◽  
Land Cover Mapping ◽  
Medium Resolution

Land cover mapping in the Upper Shire River catchment in Malawi using Landsat satellite data

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 503-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lobina G. Palamuleni ◽  
Harold J. Annegarn ◽  
Tobias Landmann
Keyword(s):  
Land Cover ◽  
Satellite Data ◽  
Land Cover Mapping ◽  
River Catchment ◽  
Landsat Satellite

scholarly journals Evaluating Combinations of Temporally Aggregated Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 for Land Cover Mapping with Google Earth Engine

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Carrasco ◽  
Aneurin O’Neil ◽  
R. Morton ◽  
Clare Rowland
Keyword(s):  
Land Cover ◽  
Satellite Data ◽  
Cloud Cover ◽  
Google Earth ◽  
Land Cover Mapping ◽  
Temporal Aggregation ◽  
Landsat 8 ◽  
Composite Approach ◽  
Google Earth Engine ◽  
Sentinel 2

Land cover mapping of large areas is challenging due to the significant volume of satellite data to acquire and process, as well as the lack of spatial continuity due to cloud cover. Temporal aggregation—the use of metrics (i.e., mean or median) derived from satellite data over a period of time—is an approach that benefits from recent increases in the frequency of free satellite data acquisition and cloud-computing power. This enables the efficient use of multi-temporal data and the exploitation of cloud-gap filling techniques for land cover mapping. Here, we provide the first formal comparison of the accuracy between land cover maps created with temporal aggregation of Sentinel-1 (S1), Sentinel-2 (S2), and Landsat-8 (L8) data from one-year and test whether this method matches the accuracy of traditional approaches. Thirty-two datasets were created for Wales by applying automated cloud-masking and temporally aggregating data over different time intervals, using Google Earth Engine. Manually processed S2 data was used for comparison using a traditional two-date composite approach. Supervised classifications were created, and their accuracy was assessed using field-based data. Temporal aggregation only matched the accuracy of the traditional two-date composite approach (77.9%) when an optimal combination of optical and radar data was used (76.5%). Combined datasets (S1, S2 or S1, S2, and L8) outperformed single-sensor datasets, while datasets based on spectral indices obtained the lowest levels of accuracy. The analysis of cloud cover showed that to ensure at least one cloud-free pixel per time interval, a maximum of two intervals per year for temporal aggregation were possible with L8, while three or four intervals could be used for S2. This study demonstrates that temporal aggregation is a promising tool for integrating large amounts of data in an efficient way and that it can compensate for the lower quality of automatic image selection and cloud masking. It also shows that combining data from different sensors can improve classification accuracy. However, this study highlights the need for identifying optimal combinations of satellite data and aggregation parameters in order to match the accuracy of manually selected and processed image composites.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document