Seismic behavior of steel buildings: Perimeter vs spatial moment frames

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Reyes-Salazar ◽  
Manuel Ernesto Soto-Lopez ◽  
Eden Bojorquez-Mora ◽  
Arturo Lopez-Barraza

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahrokh Shahbazi ◽  
Iman Mansouri ◽  
Jong Wan Hu ◽  
Armin Karami

Seismic response of a structure is affected by its dynamic properties and soil flexibility does not have an impact on it when the bottom soil of foundation is supposedly frigid, and the soil flexibility is also ignored. Hence, utilizing the results obtained through fixed-base buildings can lead to having an insecure design. Being close to the source of an earthquake production causes the majority of earthquake’s energy to reach the structure as a long-period pulse. Therefore, near-field earthquakes produce many seismic needs so that they force the structure to dissipate output energy by relatively large displacements. Hence, in this paper, the seismic response of 5- and 8-story steel buildings equipped with special moment frames (SMFs) which have been designed based on type-II and III soils (according to the seismic code of Iran-Standard 2800) has been studied. The effects of soil-structure interaction and modeling of the panel zone were considered in all of the two structures. In order to model radiation damping and prevent the reflection of outward propagating dilatational and shear waves back into the model, the vertical and horizontal Lysmer–Kuhlemeyer dashpots as seen in the figures are adopted in the free-field boundary of soil. The selected near- and far-field records were used in the nonlinear time-history analysis, and structure response was compared in both states. The results obtained from the analysis showed that the values for the shear force, displacement, column axial force, and column moment force on type-III soil are greater than the corresponding values on type-II soil; however, it cannot be discussed for drift in general.


2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 1683-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar Tapia-Hernández ◽  
Arturo Tena-Colunga

In order to help improve the seismic design of regular steel buildings structured with ductile moment-resisting concentrically braced frames (MRCBFs) using the general design methodology of Mexico's Federal District Code (MFDC-04), suitable design parameters were first assessed using the results of pushover analyses of 13 regular MRCBFs. In order to insure collapse mechanisms consistent with the assumptions implicit in a code-based design (strong-column/weak-beam/weaker-brace), it is proposed to relate the minimum strength ratio for the resisting columns of the moment frames and the bracing system. Improved equations are proposed for a more realistic assessment of ductility and overstrength factors. In a second stage, the effectiveness of the improved methodology was assessed with the design of six regular steel buildings with MRCBFs. Buildings were evaluated by performing both pushover and nonlinear time-history analyses under ten selected artificial ground motions related to the corresponding design spectrum.


Author(s):  
Keiichiro Suita ◽  
Satoshi Yamada ◽  
Motohide Tada ◽  
Kazuhiko Kasai ◽  
Yuichi Matsuoka ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A Reyes-Salazar ◽  
Oswaldo Rivera-Leyva ◽  
E Bojórquez-Mora ◽  
H Rodriguez-Lozoya ◽  
A López-Barraza

2016 ◽  
Vol 847 ◽  
pp. 222-232
Author(s):  
Bora Aksar ◽  
Selcuk Dogru ◽  
Bulent Akbas ◽  
Jay Shen ◽  
Onur Seker ◽  
...  

This study focuses on exploring the seismic axial loads for columns in steel moment resisting frames (SMRFs) under strong ground motions. For this purpose, the increases in axial loads are investigated at the maximum lateral load level and the corresponding lateral displacement. The results are presented in terms of maximum amplification factors (Ω0) of all frame columns under the selected ground motions and axial load-moment levels in columns. four typical steel moment resisting frames representing typical low, medium and high rise steel buildings are designed based on the seismic design requirement in ASCE 7-10 and AISC 341-10 . An ensemble of ground motions range from moderate to severe are selected to identify the seismic response of each frames. Two sets of ground motions corresponding to 10% and 2% probability of exceedance are used in nonlinear dynamic time history analyses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document