The Microflow Cytometer

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances S. Ligler ◽  
Jason S. Kim
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 543-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pramod Murali ◽  
Ali M. Niknejad ◽  
Bernhard E. Boser

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Erickson ◽  
Dustin Kreft ◽  
Matthew Kniller
Keyword(s):  

Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 2761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeongyeon Kim ◽  
Dayoung Kang ◽  
Sungyoung Choi

Miniaturizing flow cytometry requires a comprehensive approach to redesigning the conventional fluidic and optical systems to have a small footprint and simple usage and to enable rapid cell analysis. Microfluidic methods have addressed some challenges in limiting the realization of microflow cytometry, but most microfluidics-based flow cytometry techniques still rely on bulky equipment (e.g., high-precision syringe pumps and bench-top microscopes). Here, we describe a comprehensive approach that achieves high-throughput white blood cell (WBC) counting in a portable and handheld manner, thereby allowing the complete miniaturization of flow cytometry. Our approach integrates three major components: a motorized smart pipette for accurate volume metering and controllable liquid pumping, a microfluidic cell concentrator for target cell enrichment, and a miniaturized fluorescence microscope for portable flow cytometric analysis. We first validated the capability of each component by precisely metering various fluid samples and controlling flow rates in a range from 219.5 to 840.5 μL/min, achieving high sample-volume reduction via on-chip WBC enrichment, and successfully counting single WBCs flowing through a region of interrogation. We synergistically combined the three major components to create a handheld, integrated microflow cytometer and operated it with a simple protocol of drawing up a blood sample via pipetting and injecting the sample into the microfluidic concentrator by powering the motorized smart pipette. We then demonstrated the utility of the microflow cytometer as a quality control means for leukoreduced blood products, quantitatively analyzing residual WBCs (rWBCs) in blood samples present at concentrations as low as 0.1 rWBCs/μL. These portable, controllable, high-throughput, and quantitative microflow cytometric technologies provide promising ways of miniaturizing flow cytometry.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessio Lugnan ◽  
Emmanuel Gooskens ◽  
Jeremy Vatin ◽  
Joni Dambre ◽  
Peter Bienstman

AbstractMachine learning offers promising solutions for high-throughput single-particle analysis in label-free imaging microflow cytomtery. However, the throughput of online operations such as cell sorting is often limited by the large computational cost of the image analysis while offline operations may require the storage of an exceedingly large amount of data. Moreover, the training of machine learning systems can be easily biased by slight drifts of the measurement conditions, giving rise to a significant but difficult to detect degradation of the learned operations. We propose a simple and versatile machine learning approach to perform microparticle classification at an extremely low computational cost, showing good generalization over large variations in particle position. We present proof-of-principle classification of interference patterns projected by flowing transparent PMMA microbeads with diameters of $${15.2}\,\upmu \text {m}$$ 15.2 μ m and $${18.6}\,\upmu \text {m}$$ 18.6 μ m . To this end, a simple, cheap and compact label-free microflow cytometer is employed. We also discuss in detail the detection and prevention of machine learning bias in training and testing due to slight drifts of the measurement conditions. Moreover, we investigate the implications of modifying the projected particle pattern by means of a diffraction grating, in the context of optical extreme learning machine implementations.


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 032009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nastaran Hashemi ◽  
Jeffrey S. Erickson ◽  
Joel P. Golden ◽  
Frances S. Ligler

2010 ◽  
Vol 398 (5) ◽  
pp. 1871-1881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abel L. Thangawng ◽  
Jason S. Kim ◽  
Joel P. Golden ◽  
George P. Anderson ◽  
Kelly L. Robertson ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 81 (13) ◽  
pp. 5426-5432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason S. Kim ◽  
George P. Anderson ◽  
Jeffrey S. Erickson ◽  
Joel P. Golden ◽  
Mansoor Nasir ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 337-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han-Taw Chen ◽  
Lung-Ming Fu ◽  
Hsing-Hui Huang ◽  
Wei-En Shu ◽  
Yao-Nan Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document