scholarly journals ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline on Uses of Serum Tumor Markers in Adult Males With Germ Cell Tumors

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 199-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy D. Gilligan ◽  
Daniel F. Hayes ◽  
Jerome Seidenfeld ◽  
Sarah Temin

An examination of serum tumor markers for monitoring or surveillance for each histologic germ cell tumor subtype: seminoma and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors.

Author(s):  
Sindhu Nair P. ◽  
Jayasree Kattoor ◽  
Nileena Nayak ◽  
Preethi T. R.

Background: Germ cell tumors are found primarily in children and young adults usually arising from gonads and rarely from extragonadal sites like mediastinum, retroperitoneum, pineal gland and sacrococcygeal region. Involvement of lymphnodes or bodycavities (pleural/peritoneal cavity) is usually associated with metastatic disease.Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 96 cases of germ cell tumor for which a primary diagnosis of germ cell tumor was given by cytology from primary and metastatic sites. The study period is from January 1993- December 2013. Pap stained and Romanowsky stained smears and cell block sections (10cases) were studied. Serum tumor markers (LDH, BetaHCG and AFP) were correlated in all cases along with histopathology in available cases.Results: Among 96 cases 34 were diagnosed as seminoma/dysgerminoma,10 as embryonal carcinoma,9 as yolk sac tumor,6 as teratoma and 2 as mixed germ ell tumor. In 25 cases the cytology report was suggestive of germ cell tumor and in 10 cases malignant cells favouring germ cell tumor. Among the 10 cases the serum markers were high in six of the cases and the clinician after discussing with the pathologist treated them as germ cell tumors. 47 cases had histopathology and it correlated with cytology except in 14 cases which showed no residual neoplasm after chemotherapy. 15 cases expired immediately after the diagnosis or during the course of treatment 12cases were lost to follow up. Rest of the cases have completed the treatment. In our study the serum tumor markers showed a sensitivity of 92.75% and positive predictive value was 71.11%.Conclusions: The study highlights the importance of picking up the diagnosis of germ cell tumors by fine needle aspiration cytology so that patient can get an early diagnosis, effective treatment and a multidisciplinary approach is essential in diagnosing a difficult case of germ cell tumor. Previous history, radiology, clinical features and serum tumor markers all aid in the cytological diagnosis of germ cell tumor.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 759
Author(s):  
Nina Mørup ◽  
Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts ◽  
Anders Juul ◽  
Gedske Daugaard ◽  
Kristian Almstrup

New microRNA-based serum biomarkers (miRNA-367-3p, -371a-3p, -372-3p, and -373-3p) have shown great potential for the detection of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs), but few studies have investigated the clinical utility and performance of these tests in treatment monitoring. In this study, circulating miRNA levels were measured, together with serum tumor markers alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in 406 consecutive blood samples obtained during the treatment and follow-up of 52 TGCT patients at the Copenhagen University Hospital. After testing three different methods of RNA isolation from peripheral blood and PCR quantification in a subset of samples (n = 15), the best performing setup of targeted isolation of miRNAs inside and outside exosomes was selected to analyze all samples. At primary diagnosis, the miRNAs significantly outperformed the serum tumor markers, with a sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 100% (based on 40 patients), respectively. The picture was not as clear when patient trajectories were investigated, with both positive and negative signals for miRNAs and serum tumor markers. To establish whether measuring miRNAs adds value beyond the primary diagnosis, large prospective clinical trials comparing miRNAs and classical tumor markers during the treatment and follow-up of TGCT patients are needed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4557-4557
Author(s):  
Nabil Adra ◽  
Costantine Albany ◽  
Daniel Sonnenburg ◽  
Yan Tong ◽  
Nasser H. Hanna ◽  
...  

4557 Background: PRGCT represents 14% of germ cell tumors, with 2-year PFS of 50%. PRGCT is defined by primary mediastinal non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (PMNSGCT), non-pulmonary visceral metastasis (NPVM), AFP > 10,000 or hCG > 50,000. This analysis attempts to identify subsets of patients with more or less favorable outcomes among the poor risk groups. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all patients with testicular cancer seen at Indiana University (IU) from 2000-2010. 291 patients with PRGCT identified of whom 79 received initial therapy at IU. We analyzed the following variables: primary site testis/retroperitoneal (T/RP) vs. PMNSGCT, pulmonary vs. NPVM, and the amplitude of serum tumor markers. We identified groups of patients according to the level of tumor marker elevation with cutoff points of AFP 20,000 and hCG 200,000. Results: Mean age 29, mean AFP 8,283, mean hCG 185,667. 24% had PMNSGCT, 48% NPVM, 11% AFP>20,000, and 25% hCG>200,000. When hCG was analyzed as a continuous variable, every 10,000 unit increase in hCG caused the hazard of progression to increase by 1% (p value 0.01). Patients with NPVM had significantly worse PFS. NPVM with elevated hCG had worse outcome than NPVM with normal hCG. This did not correlate as well with AFP. PFS was worse with NPVM than elevated pre-chemotherapy tumor markers. Multiple different criteria for poor risk disease carried significantly worse impact on PFS and OS when compared to having a single criterion for poor risk disease. Conclusions: Our data indicate that patients with NPVM or more than one criteria for PRGCT have a worse outcome compared to other PRGCT subgroups. [Table: see text]


1984 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 412-412
Author(s):  
G.L. Bosl ◽  
N.L. Geller ◽  
C. Cirrincione ◽  
J. Nisselbaum ◽  
D. Vugrin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document