Team Cognition As a Means to Improve Care Delivery in Critically Ill Patients With Cancer After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1091-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan J. McNeese ◽  
Nandita Khera ◽  
Sara E. Wordingham ◽  
Noel Arring ◽  
Sharon Nyquist ◽  
...  

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an important and complex treatment modality for a variety of hematologic malignancies and some solid tumors. Although outcomes of patients who have undergone HCT and require care in intensive care units (ICUs) have improved over time, mortality rates remain high and there are significant associated costs. Lack of a team-based approach to care, especially during critical illness, is detrimental to patient autonomy and satisfaction, and to team morale, ultimately leading to poor quality of care. In this manuscript, we describe the case of a patient who had undergone HCT and was in the ICU setting, where inconsistent team interaction among the various stakeholders delivering care resulted in a lack of shared goals and poor outcomes. Team cognition is cognitive processing at the team level through interactions among team members and is reflected in dynamic communication and coordination behaviors. Although the patient received multidisciplinary care as needed in a medically complicated case, a lack of team cognition and, particularly, inconsistent communication among the dynamic teams caring for the patient, led to mixed messages being delivered with high-cost implications for the health-care system and the family. This article highlights concepts and recommendations that begin a necessary in-depth assessment of implications for clinical care and initiate a research agenda that examines the effects of team cognition on HCT teams, and, more generally, critical care of the patient with cancer.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (13) ◽  
pp. 4606-4613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed L. Sorror ◽  
Sergio Giralt ◽  
Brenda M. Sandmaier ◽  
Marcos De Lima ◽  
Munir Shahjahan ◽  
...  

A new hematopoietic cell transplantation–specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was effective in predicting outcomes among patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent HCT at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC). Here, we compared the performance of the HCT-CI to 2 other indices and then tested its capacity to predict outcomes among 2 cohorts of patients diagnosed with a single disease entity, acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission, who underwent transplantation at either FHCRC or M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). FHCRC patients less frequently had unfavorable cytogenetics (15% versus 36%) and HCT-CI scores of 3 or more (21% versus 58%) compared with MDACC patients. We found that the HCT-CI had higher sensitivity and outcome predictability compared with the other indices among both cohorts. HCT-CI scores of 0, 1 to 2, and 3 or more predicted comparable nonrelapse mortality (NRM) among FHCRC and MDACC patients. In multivariate models, HCT-CI scores were associated with the highest hazard ratios (HRS) for NRM and survival among each cohort. The 2-year survival rates among FHCRC and MDACC patients were 71% versus 56%, respectively. After adjustment for risk factors, including HCT-CI scores, no difference in survival was detected (HR: 0.98, P = .94). The HCT-CI is a sensitive and informative tool for comparing trial results at different institutions. Inclusion of comorbidity data in HCT trials provides valuable, independent information.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7046-7046
Author(s):  
Eric Jessen Chow ◽  
Kara Cushing-Haugen ◽  
Michael Boeckh ◽  
Paul Carpenter ◽  
Mary Flowers ◽  
...  

7046 Background: Infections are a major complication of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Few studies have compared the incidence of late infections occurring ≥2y post-HCT to other cancer patients and the general population. Methods: Single center records of ≥2y HCT survivors who were Washington residents treated from 1992-2009 (n = 1,792; median age 46y; 53% allogeneic; 90% hematologic malignancies) were linked to the state’s hospital discharge and death registries. Individuals randomly selected from the state cancer registry (n = 5,455, non-HCT) and driver’s license files (n = 16,340, DOL) who survived ≥2y formed two comparison groups, matched on sex, age, year, and cancer diagnosis (non-HCT group only). Based on hospital and death registry codes, incidence rate ratios (IRR) with confidence intervals (CI) of infections by organism type and organ system were estimated using Poisson regression. Results: With 6y (range 2-20) median follow up, the incidence rate (per 1000 person-y) of all infections was 65 in HCT survivors vs. 40 in the non-HCT group (IRR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-1.9). In contrast, the DOL group’s infection rate was 7 (HCT vs. DOL IRR 10.0, 95% CI 8.3-12.1). Specifically, bacterial and fungal infections were each 70% more common in HCT vs non-HCT cancer survivors (IRRs 1.7; p < 0.01). Differences in viral infection rates were more modest (IRR 1.4, p = 0.07). Infections attributed to staphylococcus, streptococcus, and non-Candida fungi including Aspergillus were twice as common in the HCT vs. non-HCT cancer survivors (IRRs 2.1-2.3; p < 0.05). IRRs for nervous system, respiratory, and musculoskeletal infections between these 2 groups were 1.9-2.8 (p < 0.05). Among potentially vaccine-preventable organisms, the IRR was 3.2 (95% CI 2.2-4.6). While the absolute incidences decreased with time, the relative risks in almost all categories were even greater when restricted to ≥5y HCT vs. non-HCT cancer survivors. Conclusions: ≥2y HCT survivors had a significantly increased incidence of infections vs. matched non-HCT cancer survivors. Providers caring for long-term HCT survivors should maintain high vigilance for infections in this population and ensure adherence to HCT antimicrobial prophylaxis and vaccination guidelines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document