scholarly journals Chemotherapy Errors: A Call for a Standardized Approach to Measurement and Reporting

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. e495-e501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inga T. Lennes ◽  
Nie Bohlen ◽  
Elyse R. Park ◽  
Elizabeth Mort ◽  
Debra Burke ◽  
...  

The Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Cancer Center is a multidisciplinary cancer center that delivers chemotherapy to 150 to 200 patients daily and adheres to the Oncology Nursing Society and ASCO guidelines for safe chemotherapy administration. An error that occurred at MGH in the summer of 2012 prompted a review of all safety events, the process of classification, and the monitoring of safety events. This article reviews safety monitoring in the oncology setting, details the oncology safety-event reporting program at MGH, summarizes all chemotherapy-related safety events that have occurred over the past 5 years, and concludes with summary recommendations and potential steps to standardize safety reporting and analysis in chemotherapy administration.

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 760-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T. Penson ◽  
Lidia Schapira ◽  
Sally Mack ◽  
Marjorie Stanzler ◽  
Thomas J. Lynch

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 238-238
Author(s):  
Gayle C. Blouin ◽  
Christine Chio ◽  
E. Bridget Kim ◽  
Conor McGladrigan ◽  
Nie Bohlen ◽  
...  

238 Background: Safety reporting is imperative because it provides an opportunity to identify and address preventable errors to enhance patient safety. Pharmacists at the Massachusetts General Hospital cancer center have historically submitted the highest number of safety reports compared to clinicians/nursing. This past year, however, there was a decline in the number of reports submitted. Because pharmacists are in a key position to monitor patient safety, this study was conducted to characterize safety reports submitted by pharmacists and describe subsequent action plans. Additionally, pharmacists’ attitudes towards safety reporting were assessed and obstacles identified. Methods: A retrospective analysis of medication safety reports submitted by outpatient staff over the past 4 years was conducted. Data were obtained from institutional safety reporting system. Pharmacy procedures and education materials were compared against safety reports. Pharmacists’ attitudes were assessed using online survey adapted from the AHRQ. Results: Pharmacists consistently submitted more safety reports compared to other disciplines. However, safety reporting declined from a mean of 61 reports annually to 40 in 2013. The majority of reported events involved prescribing errors, followed by orders submitted to pharmacy without meeting treatment criteria. Actions plans included: protocol checklists, staff education and updating order sets. The majority of pharmacists surveyed agreed/strongly agreed that the practice is actively doing things to improve patient safety and mistakes have led to positive changes. When an event is reported, almost 50% of pharmacists indicated infusion unit staff perceive the person is being written up, not the problem. Common barriers to reporting were time constraints, nurses taking reports personally and not knowing which events warrant reporting. Conclusions: Pharmacists at our institution play an integral role in safety reporting which is essential to provide quality patient care and enhance patient safety. Obstacles identified in this study may have contributed to the recent decline in reporting. Opportunities exist to reinforce non-punitive nature of safety reporting.


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saul N. Weingart ◽  
Justin W. Li ◽  
Junya Zhu ◽  
Laurinda Morway ◽  
Sherri O. Stuver ◽  
...  

Given wide variation in the implementation of ASCO/Oncology Nursing Society chemotherapy administration safety standards at US cancer centers, there are significant opportunities for improvement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document