scholarly journals Assessment of the Need for a Hematology-Specific Fellowship Curriculum for Advanced Practice Providers Using a Needs-Based Survey

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. e593-e599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi L. Hwa ◽  
Ariela L. Marshall ◽  
Jessica L. Shelly ◽  
Lisa K. Colborn ◽  
Grzegorz S. Nowakowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
School Curriculum ◽  
Learning Needs ◽  
Subspecialty Training ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
New Graduates ◽  
Blood And Marrow Transplantation

PURPOSE: Subspecialty training programs rarely are available for advanced practice providers (APPs). New curricula are needed to prepare APPs with the skills and knowledge required to deliver high-quality care in hematology and blood and marrow transplantation (BMT). METHODS: A Web-based needs assessment survey was distributed to APPs currently working in hematology and BMT at three Mayo Clinic sites (Rochester, MN; Scottsdale, AZ; and Jacksonville, FL). The survey assessed participants’ perceptions of readiness to practice in hematology after completion of their APP education and identified APP learning needs. RESULTS: Of 68 APPs, 49 (72%; 34 nurse practitioners, 15 physician assistants) completed the survey. Twenty-eight APPs (57%) were new graduates, and 17 (35%) had no prior experience in hematology/BMT. All APPs held a master’s degree or higher (doctorate, 31%). Thirty-nine (80%) reported that less than 5% of their APP school curriculum was hematology focused. More than 90% felt unprepared to practice in hematology or BMT after their APP education and believed that hematology-specific training could improve their competency as providers and positively affect job satisfaction. APPs reported that they would like more formal training in the following areas of clinical focus: malignant and benign hematologic disorders, hematopathology, palliative care, transfusion medicine, infectious disease, and hematology-related pharmacology. They also preferred the following learning strategies: active learning from patient care, case-based teaching, and experience during hospital rounds. CONCLUSION: This needs-based assessment project confirmed the necessity to develop a hematology-specific fellowship for APPs and helped to optimize the curriculum.

scholarly journals Development of a Hematology-Specific Fellowship Curriculum for Advanced Practice Providers Utilizing a Needs-Based Assessment

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2236-2236
Author(s):  
Yi L. Hwa ◽  
Ariela L. Marshall ◽  
Jessica L Shelly ◽  
Lisa K Colborn ◽  
Grzegorz S. Nowakowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Work Experience ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Subspecialty Training ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Hematologic Disorders

Abstract Background: As our healthcare system faces increasing complexity, it is important for all healthcare providers to practice at the full scope of their training. However, there are limited current options for subspecialty training in hematology for advanced practice providers (APPs), a group of health care providers including both nurse practitioners and physician assistants. We are unaware of any existing postgraduate fellowship for APPs focused on education in both malignant and nonmalignant hematologic disorders. We hope that by creation of the first such fellowship, we can better prepare APP graduates with the subspecialty-specific knowledge required to become highly skilled and competent clinicians in hematology. Methods: Using surveyhero.com, we conducted a web-based needs assessment survey which was distributed to 68 APPs currently working in the hematology and blood & marrow transplant (BMT) teams at three Mayo Clinic sites (Rochester, Scottsdale, and Jacksonville). This survey included questions regarding hematology-specific education the respondents had received in their APP schools, as a way to assess participant's perceptions about the readiness to practice in hematology after completion of APP education, and to identify the learning/training needs that are most important for APPs to practice in hematology. Results: Of 68 APPs, 49 (72%; 34 NPs,15 PAs) completed the survey. 57% of respondents were new APP graduates when hired and 35% had no prior work experience in hematology/BMT. All APPs held a Master's or higher degree (doctorate 31%). Thirty-nine (80%) reported <5% of their APP school curriculum was hematology-focused. The majority (92%) felt that the level of subspecialty training they received in APP schools did not adequately prepare them with the full confidence to practice in hematology. Forty-four (90%) APPs believed subspecialty training could help them to become more competent providers for patients with hematologic disorders. Forty-seven (96%) APPs agreed that being confident and knowledgeable in their practice positively impacted their job satisfaction, and most APPs (84%) felt structured hematology training would attract them to stay within the specialty. The educational subjects that APPs identified as most important included variety of malignant and benign hematologic disorders as well as hematopathology, bone marrow transplant, palliative care, transfusion medicine, infectious disease and pharmacology related to hematology practice. The top three effective learning strategies reported by the APP respondents were active learning from direct patient care, cased based teaching, and educational experience during hospital rounds. Conclusions and Discussions: This needs-based assessment educational project revealed to us the significant gaps in subspecialty training of APP education in hematology and confirmed the necessity of this fellowship. The findings of the survey helped us to optimize the fellowship curriculum in order to meet the learning needs of future APP trainees. Development of the subspecialty fellowship program is a step forward in the future training of APPs. We believe our fellowship has the potential to serve as the postgraduate training model for other institutions nationwide. Disclosures Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding.

Collaborating With Advanced Practice Providers: Impact and Opportunity

2017 ◽  
pp. e1-e7
Author(s):  
Heather M. Hylton ◽  
G. Lita Smith
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Direct Patient Care ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Care Access ◽  
Centered Care

Although significant progress has been made in cancer care, access to coordinated, high-quality care across the cancer care continuum remains a challenge for many patients. With significant workforce shortages in oncology anticipated, physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs)—known collectively as advanced practice providers (APPs)—are considered to be a part of the solution to bridging the gap between the supply of and demand for oncology services. APPs are integral to the provision of team-based care in oncology, and optimizing the roles of all members of the patient’s care team is vital to ensuring the teams are cost-effective and that each team member is performing at the functional level intended. Studies have shown significant patient, physician, and APP satisfaction with collaborative care models, and APPs are well positioned to enhance value for patients in the oncology setting. Understanding the full scope of APP impact can be challenging as it extends well beyond direct patient care. As rapid progress in cancer care continues, innovative approaches to care delivery will be necessary to ensure patients’ access. Effective oncologist–APP partnerships will be key to providing optimal, value-centered care to patients.

Outcomes of Tube Thoracostomies Performed by Advanced Practice Providers vs Trauma Surgeons

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Bevis ◽  
Gina M. Berg-Copas ◽  
Bruce W. Thomas ◽  
Donald G. Vasquez ◽  
Ruth Wetta-Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Trauma Centers ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Trauma Surgeons

Background The role of advanced registered nurse practitioners and physician assistants in emergency departments, trauma centers, and critical care is becoming more widely accepted. These personnel, collectively known as advanced practice providers, expand physicians’ capabilities and are being increasingly recruited to provide care and perform invasive procedures that were previously performed exclusively by physicians. Objectives To determine whether the quality of tube thoracostomies performed by advanced practice providers is comparable to that performed by trauma surgeons and to ascertain whether the complication rates attributable to tube thoracostomies differ on the basis of who performed the procedure. Methods Retrospective blinded reviews of patients’ charts and radiographs were conducted to determine differences in quality indicators, complications, and outcomes of tube thoracostomies by practitioner type: trauma surgeons vs advanced practice providers. Results Differences between practitioner type in insertion complications, complications requiring additional interventions, hospital length of stay, and morbidity were not significant. The only significant difference was a complication related to placement of the tube: when the tube extended caudad, toward the feet, from the insertion site. Interrater reliability ranged from good to very good. Conclusions Use of advanced practice providers provides consistent and quality tube thoracostomies. Employment of these practitioners may be a safe and reasonable solution for staffing trauma centers.

Practice Model for Advanced Practice Providers in Oncology

2017 ◽  
pp. 40-43
Author(s):  
Jamie Cairo ◽  
Mary Ann Muzi ◽  
Deanna Ficke ◽  
Shaunta Ford-Pierce ◽  
Katrina Goetzke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Professional Growth ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Quality Improvements ◽  
Collaborative Relationships ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
Patients With Cancer

According to ASCO, the number of practicing oncologists has remained stable despite growth demands, leading to an overall shortage in many areas of the country. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants are advanced practice providers (APPs) who can assist in the provision of support and care to patients with cancer, but the role of the APP in the oncology setting has not been well defined. There exists a variety of different practice patterns for APPs who work in oncology, and the lack of role definition and absence of an established practice model are considered leading causes of APP attrition. According to the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, it has been well demonstrated that, when nurse practitioners are allowed to work to the full scope of their education and preparation, there are notable cost reductions and quality improvements in patient care. The focus of APP education and training is on health promotion, disease prevention, and primary care medical management, but most APPs have limited exposure to management of cancer in patients. With this in mind, Aurora Cancer Care developed a practice model for APPs who work in oncology. The goal of the model is to enhance the quality of care delivered to patients and provide a stimulating work environment that fosters excellent collaborative relationships with oncologist colleagues, supports professional growth, and allows APPs to practice to the full extent of their licensure.

Heightened malpractice risk for hospitalist physicians in the USA: what to know and what to do

2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (1128) ◽  
pp. 531-533
Author(s):  
Zachary R Paterick ◽  
Timothy Edward Paterick
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Hospital Medicine ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Medical Providers ◽  
Professional Liability ◽  
Optimal Patient Care ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Unique Relationship

Hospitalists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants and institutions are all at risk for the potential professional liability issues. The unique relationship between healthcare providers and their sponsoring institution generates complex and evolving legal issues for all participants. The law has played a great role integrating quality care and patient safety with physicians, while providing an avenue for relief when a medical error occurs. The intersection of law and medicine, while allowing for optimal patient care, exposes participating medical providers and the sponsoring institutions to specific professional liability issues. This article addresses the heightened medical practice risk that hospitalist physicians’ encounter in today’s practice of hospital medicine.

Efficient and Effective Models for Integrating Advanced Practice Professionals into Oncology Practice

2013 ◽  
pp. e377-e379
Author(s):  
Lawrence N. Shulman
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Practice Style ◽  
Oncology Care ◽  
Oncology Practice ◽  
Effective Models

Advanced practice professionals (APP), primarily nurse practitioners and physician assistants, are increasingly being integrated into oncology practices. The reasons are numerous, and models of care options are numerous as well. Models of care have developed without much forethought and are often the result of the relative interests of the physician, the APP, and the mutual “comfort” of practice style. The increasing complexity of oncology care, the pressures of the health care crisis and health care reform mean that it is necessary that we examine models of collaborative care in terms of both quality of care and productivity.

Scope of practice of advanced practice providers (APP) in US community oncology.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6646-6646
Author(s):  
Andrew Klink ◽  
Bela Bapat ◽  
Yolaine Smith ◽  
Chadi Nabhan ◽  
Bruce A. Feinberg
Keyword(s):  
Patient Education ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Scope Of Practice ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsies ◽  
Community Oncology ◽  
Eol Care

6646 Background: Oncology practices are increasingly employing nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) known collectively as advanced practice providers (APPs) to improve practice workflow, increase efficiency, and enable physicians to focus on complex patient care. Understanding variations in scope of practice for APPs may help establish a benchmark against which future changes are measured. Methods: US community physicians responded to a web-based survey from Sep to Nov 2018. Physicians were asked how frequently their APPs performed certain tasks on a 5-point scale (i.e., never, occasionally, sometimes, frequently, and always). Responses have been summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: In this study, 163 physicians were surveyed, most (81.0%, n = 132) used APPs in their practice. Among physicians using APPs, 91.7% (n = 121) used NPs and 49.2% (n = 65) used PAs. Most physicians stated that APPs were frequently/always involved in providing patient education (84.1%), ordering imaging and laboratory studies (68.9%), and/or making supportive care decisions (62.1%). Over 85% (57.6%-59.8% occasionally/sometimes; 28.0%-28.8% frequently/always) of physicians agreed that APPs discussed imaging reports and end of life (EOL) care (57.6% occasionally/sometimes, 28.8% frequently/always) with patients. Regarding procedures: 51.9% (28.0% occasionally/sometimes; 24.1% frequently/always) responded that APPs performed bone marrow biopsies and intrathecal chemotherapy. Regarding systemic therapy: 68.2% (58.3% occasionally/ sometimes; 9.8% frequently) allowed APPs to modify existing regimen e.g., dose/schedule change; 39.4% responded that APPs made decisions about new therapy selection. Conclusions: While substantial variation in the role of APPs in community oncology practices was observed, similar themes emerged. APPs appear to be integral in patient education, ordering laboratory and imaging studies, and discussing EOL care. Fewer are involved in managing and selecting supportive care and systemic therapy. Longitudinal and longer follow up are warranted to ascertain whether the scope of these practices change over time.

Impact of advanced practice providers (nurse practitioners and physician assistants) on surgical residents' critical care experience

2015 ◽  
Vol 199 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. Kahn ◽  
Sarah A. Davis ◽  
Caroline T. Banes ◽  
Bradley M. Dennis ◽  
Addison K. May ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Care Experience ◽  
Surgical Residents

Palliative Care in Nephrology

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Medical Practitioners ◽  
Seriously Ill Patients

Palliative care has become increasingly important across the spectrum of healthcare, and with it, the need for education and training of a broad range of medical practitioners not previously associated with this field of care. As part of the Integrating Palliative Care series, this volume on palliative care in nephrology guides readers through the core palliative knowledge and skills needed to deliver high value, high quality care for seriously ill patients with chronic and end-stage kidney disease. Chapters are written by a team of international leaders in kidney palliative care and are organized into sections exploring unmet supportive care needs, palliative care capacity, patient-centered care, enhanced support at the end of life, and more. Chapter topics are based on the Coalition for Supportive Care of Kidney Patients Pathways Project change package of 14 evidence-based best practices to improve the delivery of palliative care to patients with kidney disease. An overview of the future of palliative care nephrology with attention to needed policy changes rounds out the text. Palliative Care in Nephrology is an ideal resource for nephrologists, nurses, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, social workers, primary care clinicians, and other practitioners who wish to learn more about integrating individualized, patient-centered palliative care into treatment of their patients with kidney disease.

A chemotherapy privileging process for advanced practice providers at an academic medical center

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-123
Author(s):  
Michelle A Carrasquillo ◽  
Tyler A Vest ◽  
Jill S Bates ◽  
Aimee Faso ◽  
Jessica Auten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Supportive Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Physician Assistants ◽  
Advanced Practice ◽  
Training Process ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Oncology Practice

Purpose Nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists are advanced practice providers who are highly trained and qualified healthcare professionals that can help support traditional demands on oncologists' increased time in direct patient care. The purpose of this study was to detail and assess the creation of a privileging process for this group of medical professionals within an academic medical center. Obtaining the designation of limited oncology practice provider (LOPP) gives the right to modify chemotherapy orders and to order supportive care medications. Methods An interdisciplinary team developed a comprehensive training process inclusive of required educational domains, knowledge goals, and educational activities to become an LOPP. In 2018, five years after the implementation of the privileging process, a survey was distributed to assess perceptions of the training process and integration of LOPPs within oncology practice. Results Most oncologists noted that working with LOPPs is beneficial to oncology practice (94%) and that they make modifying chemotherapy orders more efficient (87%). Greater than 82% of LOPPs also reported that their privileges streamline the chemotherapy process and make them feel valuable. Conclusion The creation of the LOPP designation is an effective way to integrate nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists within oncology practice. The inclusion of a focused privileging process ensures the safety of cancer care provided and has created a streamlined process for chemotherapy modifications and supportive care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document