scholarly journals Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Progressive Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With 177Lu-Dotatate in the Phase III NETTER-1 Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (25) ◽  
pp. 2578-2584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Strosberg ◽  
Edward Wolin ◽  
Beth Chasen ◽  
Matthew Kulke ◽  
David Bushnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Health Related Qol ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) progression is associated with deterioration in quality of life (QoL). We assessed the impact of 177Lu-Dotatate treatment on time to deterioration in health-related QoL. Methods The NETTER-1 trial is an international phase III study in patients with midgut NETs. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 177Lu-Dotatate versus high-dose octreotide. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaires QLQ C-30 and G.I.NET-21 were assessed during the trial to determine the impact of treatment on health-related QoL. Patients completed the questionnaires at baseline and every 12 weeks until tumor progression. QoL scores were converted to a 100-point scale according to European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer instructions, and individual changes from baseline scores were assessed. Time to QoL deterioration (TTD) was defined as the time from random assignment to the first QoL deterioration ≥ 10 points for each patient in the corresponding domain scale. All analyses were conducted on the intention-to-treat population. Patients with no deterioration were censored at the last QoL assessment date. Results TTD was significantly longer in the 177Lu-Dotatate arm (n = 117) versus the control arm (n = 114) for the following domains: global health status (hazard ratio [HR], 0.406), physical functioning (HR, 0.518), role functioning (HR, 0.580), fatigue (HR, 0.621), pain (HR, 0.566), diarrhea (HR, 0.473), disease-related worries (HR, 0.572), and body image (HR, 0.425). Differences in median TTD were clinically significant in several domains: 28.8 months versus 6.1 months for global health status, and 25.2 months versus 11.5 months for physical functioning. Conclusion This analysis from the NETTER-1 phase III study demonstrates that, in addition to improving progression-free survival, 177Lu-Dotatate provides a significant QoL benefit for patients with progressive midgut NETs compared with high-dose octreotide.

Quality-of-life findings in patients with midgut neuroendocrine tumors: Results of the NETTER-1 phase III trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 348-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan R. Strosberg ◽  
Edward M. Wolin ◽  
Beth Chasen ◽  
Matthew H. Kulke ◽  
David L Bushnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Global Health Status ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
The Impact

348 Background: Neuroendocrine tumor progression is associated with decline in quality of life, both due to tumor and hormone-related symptoms. The Phase III NETTER-1 trial randomized patients with advanced, progressive midgut NETs to receive treatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE (177Lu; Lutathera) versus high-dose (60 mg) Octreotide LAR (Oct). EORTC questionnaires C30 and GINET21 were assessed during the trial in order to determine the impact of treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: Patients completed EORTC QLQ-30 and QLQ-G.I.NET21 questionnaires at baseline and every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression. Raw scores were converted to a 100-point scale and individual changes from baseline scores were assessed. Clinically relevant ( ≥ 10 point) deterioration/improvement was considered clinically significant. Results: Clinically and statistically significant improvements in QoL were observed in the 177Lu arm versus the Oct arm at certain time points in key domains of HRQoL including global health status and diarrhea. In mean, global health status improved in 28% of patients on 177Lu arm vs. 15% on Oct, and worsened in 18% of patients on 177Lu vs. 26% on Oct. Diarrhea improved in 39% of patients on 177Lu vs. 23% on Oct, and worsened in 19% of patients on 177Lu vs. 23% on Oct. There was a trend towards improvement in pain that was not statistically significant. Flushing appeared to improve compared to baseline in both arms of the study with no clear advantage to treatment with 177Lu vs. Oct. Conclusions: QoL analysis suggests benefit in important domains associated with 177Lu treatment compared to high-dose octreotide in patients with advanced midgut NETs, and confirms the treatment value of 177Lu on patient QoL, in addition to the meaningful increase in progression-free survival already reported. Clinical trial information: NCT01578239.

Health-related quality of life/patient-reported outcomes in relapsed ovarian cancer: Results from a randomized phase III study of trabectedin with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) versus PLD alone

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5526-5526
Author(s):  
C. N. Krasner ◽  
A. Poveda ◽  
T. Herzog ◽  
J. Vermorken ◽  
B. Monk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Gi Symptoms ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
The Impact

5526 Background: In an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase III study comparing the combination of trabectedin and PLD to PLD alone in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer, the combination demonstrated significantly improved progression free survival and response rates, manageable non-cumulative toxicity, and fewer PLD-associated adverse events. We studied the impact of the combination of trabectedin with PLD on the quality of life (QoL)/patient-reported outcomes (PRO) evaluated as part of the trial. Methods: QoL/PRO questionnaires, EORTC-QLQ C30, OV28, and EQ-5D were completed by patients at screening and on Day 1 of every other treatment cycle starting with Cycle 1, and at the end-of-treatment visit. Global health status/QoL, fatigue, rain subscales from QLQ C30, and abdominal pain/GI symptoms scale from OV28 were chosen a priori for primary analyses. Other scales of the three questionnaires were analyzed on a supportive basis. Results: A total of 672 patients were randomized. 663 (98%) completed at least the baseline questionnaires. Median cycles of treatment was 6 (131 days) for the combination arm and 5 (143 days) for the monotherapy arm. Mixed effects models (using a covariance structure of AR[1]) predicting the score at baseline and follow-up scores as a function of treatment, days after baseline, and interaction between treatment and days after baseline showed no significant differences between the treatment arms for any of the prespecified scales. Similar analyses of other scales, including EQ-5D Health Index scores and Health State on the Visual Analog Scale, support the findings. Conclusions: The addition of trabectedin to PLD results in superior efficacy in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer, with no added decrement to overall health status as assessed by PRO. [Table: see text]

Impact on quality of life of adding cetuximab to irinotecan in patients who have failed prior oxaliplatin-based therapy: The EPIC trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4003-4003 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Eng ◽  
J. Maurel ◽  
W. Scheithauer ◽  
L. Wong ◽  
M. Lutz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Global Health Status ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
The Impact

4003 Background: EPIC, a multinational phase III clinical trial examined the impact of cetuximab on survival in pretreated EGFR- expressing metastatic colorectal (MCRC) patients (pts). Pts were randomized to either cetuximab 400 mg/m2 followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly and irinotecan 350 mg/m2 q 3 weeks or irinotecan alone. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with quality of life being one of the secondary endpoints. Methods: Health Related Quality of life (HRQoL) of pts in this trial was assessed through the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, version 3.0. Pts completed the questionnaire pretreatment, every second cycle, and at first follow-up visit. HRQoL was compared between treatment arms using a Wei-Lachin test. Results: Baseline demographics were balanced between the arms. Cetuximab plus irinotecan (n=648) was superior to irinotecan alone (n=650) in progression-free survival (HR 0.69, p<.0001) and response rate (16.4 vs 4.2%, p<.0001). OS was comparable between the arms, but may have been influenced by subsequent therapy: 46% of subjects in the irinotecan alone arm received cetuximab, 89% of them in combination with irinotecan. Baseline HRQoL scores did not significantly differ between treatment arms for 11 of the 15 scales. For 4 scales (Social Functioning, Fatigue, Dyspnea, and Appetite Loss), there were statistically significant differences in baseline scores, in favor of the cetuximab plus irinotecan arm. Non- compliance rates (missing questionnaires) were similar between the arms. A statistically significant difference was noted for pts in the cetuximab plus irinotecan arm in HRQoL on 10 of the 15 scales as compared to patients in the irinotecan arm, with the scores of the cetuximab plus irinotecan arm consistently higher, as noted by the scales of Global Health Status (p=.047), pain (p< .0001), and nausea (p<.0001). Conclusions: In addition to statistically significant improvements in PFS and RR in patients receiving cetuximab plus irinotecan compared with irinotecan alone, HRQoL was better preserved on the combination arm with less deterioration in symptom scores (pain, nausea, insomnia), as well as global health status scores. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Symptom Control and Quality of Life in LUX-Lung 3: A Phase III Study of Afatinib or Cisplatin/Pemetrexed in Patients With Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma With EGFR Mutations

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (27) ◽  
pp. 3342-3350 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Chih-Hsin Yang ◽  
Vera Hirsh ◽  
Martin Schuler ◽  
Nobuyuki Yamamoto ◽  
Kenneth J. O'Byrne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Over Time

Purpose Patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life (QoL) benefits were investigated in a randomized, phase III trial of afatinib or cisplatin/pemetrexed. Patients and Methods Three hundred forty-five patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation–positive lung adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned 2:1 to afatinib 40 mg per day or up to six cycles of cisplatin/pemetrexed. Lung cancer symptoms and health-related QoL were assessed every 21 days until progression using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and Lung Cancer-13 questionnaires. Analyses of cough, dyspnea, and pain were preplanned, including percentage of patients who improved on therapy, time to deterioration of symptoms, and change in symptoms over time. Results Questionnaire compliance was high. Compared with chemotherapy, afatinib significantly delayed the time to deterioration for cough (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.87; P = .007) and dyspnea (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.93; P = .015), but not pain (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.10; P = .19). More patients on afatinib (64%) versus chemotherapy (50%) experienced improvements in dyspnea scores (P = .010). Differences in mean scores over time significantly favored afatinib over chemotherapy for cough (P < .001) and dyspnea (P < .001). Afatinib showed significantly better mean scores over time in global health status/QoL (P = .015) and physical (P < .001), role (P = .004), and cognitive (P = .007) functioning compared with chemotherapy. Fatigue and nausea were worse with chemotherapy, whereas diarrhea, dysphagia, and sore mouth were worse with afatinib (all P < .01). Conclusion In patients with lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations, first-line afatinib was associated with better control of cough and dyspnea compared with chemotherapy, although diarrhea, dysphagia, and sore mouth were worse. Global health status/QoL was also improved over time with afatinib compared with chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Quality of life assessments in clinical practice using either the EORTC-QLQ-C30 or the SEIOQL-DW: a randomized study

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Åsa Kettis ◽  
Hanna Fagerlind ◽  
Jan-Erik Frödin ◽  
Bengt Glimelius ◽  
Lena Ring
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Health Related Qol ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background Effective patient-physician communication can improve patient understanding, agreement on treatment and adherence. This may, in turn, impact on clinical outcomes and patient quality of life (QoL). One way to improve communication is by using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Heretofore, studies of the impact of using PROMs in clinical practice have mostly evaluated the use of standardized PROMs. However, there is reason to believe that individualized instruments may be more appropriate for this purpose. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the standardized QoL-instrument, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C-30 (EORTC-QOL-C30) and the individualized QoL instrument, the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW), in clinical practice. Methods In a prospective, open-label, controlled intervention study at two hospital out-patient clinics, 390 patients with gastrointestinal cancer were randomly assigned either to complete the EORTC-QOL-C30 or the SEIQoL-DW immediately before the consultation, with their responses being shared with their physician. This was repeated in 3–5 consultations over a period of 4–6 months. The primary outcome measure was patients’ health-related QoL, as measured by FACIT-G. Patients’ satisfaction with the consultation and survival were secondary outcomes. Results There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to study outcomes. Neither intervention instrument resulted in any significant changes in health-related QoL, or in any of the secondary outcomes, over time. This may reflect either a genuine lack of effect or sub-optimization of the intervention. Since there was no comparison to standard care an effect in terms of lack of deterioration over time cannot be excluded. Conclusions Future studies should focus on the implementation process, including the training of physicians to use the instruments and their motivation for doing so. The effects of situational use of standardized or individualized instruments should also be explored. The effectiveness of the different approaches may depend on contextual factors including physician and patient preferences.

scholarly journals Meeting Psychosocial Needs to Improve Health: A Prospective Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austyn Snowden ◽  
Jenny Young ◽  
Jan Savinc
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Cancer Stage ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Cancer impacts on patients and their families across a range of different domains. For that reason, optimal cancer care has moved away from a disease-centric focus to a more holistic approach in order to proactively support people with their individual needs and concerns. While international policy clearly advocates this agenda, implementation into routine care is limited. Therefore, relevant interventions that measurably improve patient outcomes are essential to understand if this ideal is to become routine multidisciplinary practice. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of a proactive, holistic, community-based intervention on health-related quality of life in a cohort of people diagnosed with cancer. Secondary aim was to explore the relationship between changes in health status and: cancer type, cancer stage, number of concerns expressed and change in severity of concerns pre and post intervention. Method Prospective observational cohort study. A convenience sample of 437 individuals were referred to the service ‘Improving the Cancer Journey (ICJ) in the UK. Each completed the Euroqol EQ-5D-3L and visual analogue scale (VAS) and a Holistic Needs Assessment (HNA) during initial visit to the service and again at follow-up review, approximately 4 months later. Change between scores was tested with paired t-tests and relationships between variables with multiple regression models. Results Participants were White British with median age between 50-64 years. Cancer type and stage were varied. There was a statistically significant improvement in EQ-5D scores over time (t(330)=7.48, p<.001). The strongest predictor of change was a decrease in severity of concerns. Cancer stage ‘palliative care’ contributed to a reduction in health status. Conclusion This study is the first to show that a holistic community intervention dedicated to supporting the individual concerns of participants has a statistically and meaningful impact on participants’ health-related quality of life. The mean change in EQ-5D scores was more than the ‘minimally important clinical difference’ described in the literature. This is important because while quality of life has multiple determinants this study has reported that it is possible to capture a meaningful improvement as a function of reducing someone’s personally identified concerns.

Predictors of Quality of Life in Young Adults Diagnosed With Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 587-597
Author(s):  
Charmaine A. McKie ◽  
Adeyinka O. Laiyemo
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Young Adults ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Perception Of Health ◽  
The Impact

A cross-section correlational study was conducted to evaluate the overall quality of life in young adults (AYAs) diagnosed with cancer, and the impact of health-related and non-health-related factors on their quality of life. Fifty-six AYA cancer survivors were recruited to elicit the impact of biological function (cancer type and comorbidity), symptoms, functional status, general perception of health status, gender, and characteristics of the environment on quality of life. Participants experienced higher than average quality of life. Symptoms, functional status, and general perception of health status were significant predictors of quality of life in this group of AYAs diagnosed with cancer. In delivering quality cancer care, nurses must be able to thoroughly assess symptom status, AYA cancer survivors’ perception of their health status, and functioning in order to implement supportive measures to help improve their quality of life.

scholarly journals P101: Quality of life in patients discharged from the emergency department with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF/AFL): a prospective cohort study

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S112
Author(s):  
S. Patrick ◽  
P. Duke ◽  
K. Lobay ◽  
M. Haager ◽  
B. Deane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Bodily Pain ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Health Related Qol ◽  
Health Related ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Following an emergency department (ED) presentation for acute atrial fibrillation and/or flutter (AF/AFL), patients often experience anxiety, depression and impaired health-related quality of life (QoL). Emergency physicians may prescribe appropriate thrombo-embolic (TE) prophylaxis upon discharge; however, the QoL of these patients is unclear. This study measured the QoL of patients with AF/AFL following discharge to determine the factors associated with QoL. Methods: Patients ≥18 years of age identified by the attending physician as having a diagnosis of acute AF/AFL confirmed by ECG were prospectively enrolled from three Edmonton, AB EDs. Using standardized enrollment forms, trained research assistants collected data on patient demographics factors and management both in the ED and at discharge. Patients’ health-related QoL was assessed up to 20 days after their initial ED visit by a telephone interview based on six domains of the short-form 8 health survey. Results: From a total of 196 enrolled patients, 121 (62%) were male and the mean age was 63 years (standard deviation ±14). Most patients had previous history of AF/AFL (71%), and emergency physicians had the opportunity to treat or revise TE prevention therapy in 19% of the patients. The majority (89%) were discharged with prescriptions for antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents, and 188 (96%) were contacted by telephone at a median of 7 days. Most patients rated their overall health between good and excellent (70%); however, 30% assessed their health as fair or very poor. Many also reported having physical limitations (54%), difficulties completing their daily work (42%), bodily pain (32%) and limitations in social activities (32%). Finally, some patients reported having low energy (25%). At follow up, patients receiving adequate TE prevention rated their health to be similar to those without adequate TE prevention (30% vs 23%; p=0.534). Conclusion: Overall, patients with acute, symptomatic AF/AFL seen in the ED have impairments in health-related QoL following discharge from the ED. Many factors contribute to this impairment; however, providing patients with appropriate TE prophylaxis at discharge did not explain these findings. Further research is required to explore the impact of AF/AFL on patient’s health-related QoL after discharge from the ED.

scholarly journals Deterioration of Health-Related Quality of Life Scores under Treatment Predicts Longer Survival

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maike Jörling ◽  
Sandra Rutzner ◽  
Markus Hecht ◽  
Rainer Fietkau ◽  
Luitpold V. Distel
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Global Health Status ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Objectives. Baseline health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores predict survival, which has already been demonstrated in various studies. However, we were interested in whether changes in baseline scores during treatment are also significant predictors of survival. Methods and Materials. We analysed the data of 400 consecutive cancer patients receiving radiochemotherapy. Leading diagnoses were head and neck cancer (34.5%), rectal cancer (24.5%), and lung cancer (13%). HRQoL was studied at baseline, six weeks after therapy and after each completed year after the start of therapy until drop out of the study using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The change score was calculated as the baseline score subtracted from the score after therapy. Statistics included Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression. Results. High global health status (p=0.005) and low pain scores (p=0.040) at baseline were related to favourable overall survival. Change scores of role functioning (p=0.027), global health status (p<0.018), and pain (p<0.001) were predictive of overall survival. Pain was the superior predictor of survival (p=0.001) among all variables and QoL scores studied by multivariate analysis. A deterioration in pain was associated with a 2.8 times higher chance of survival (HR 0.36). Conclusions. Deterioration of HRQoL baseline pain score by cancer treatment is a favourable and superior prognostic factor for survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document