scholarly journals Value of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A European Perspective

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 587-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Fotopoulou ◽  
Jalid Sehouli ◽  
Giovanni Aletti ◽  
Philipp Harter ◽  
Sven Mahner ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amaranta D Craig ◽  
Eduardo Garcia ◽  
Pamela N Peters ◽  
Lee-may Chen ◽  
Jocelyn S Chapman

Aims: This study evaluated primary treatment modalities in advanced ovarian cancer according to sociodemographic characteristics and characterized chemotherapy regimens used. Methods: This was a retrospective study of newly diagnosed advanced ovarian, tubal or peritoneal cancer patients at two hospitals from 2011 to 2016. Results: Of 175 women, 41% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 59% received primary cytoreductive surgery. Within the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, 23% did not have a surgical consultation prior to initiating treatment. Women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy lived closer to an academic center and more frequently received carboplatin/paclitaxel every 3 weeks. Cytoreductive surgery patients more frequently received intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Conclusion: The authors identified disparities in age, insurance, distance from treatment center and chemotherapy choice in the primary treatment for ovarian cancer.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Prem Kumar Devdoss ◽  
Prasanna Srinivasa Rao H

Objective: The objective of this retrospective study is to identify the elimination half life of CA 125 biomarker in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer at our centre and develop it as a surrogate marker of response to chemotherapy. Methods: Medical records of women who were newly diagnosed with inoperable advanced ovarian cancer stages III and IV at our centre were selected. Only people with completely documented records in the years 2017 & 2018 were selected. Clinical information on age, menopausal status, BMI, radiological PCI, stage, histology, chemotherapy drugs used, CA 125 levels before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were noted and information analysed. Only 40 patients were identified meeting all required criteria. The patients were divided into 3 sets based on CA 125 elimination half life group 1(t ½ < 10 days), group 2 (t ½ 10- 20 days) and group 3 (t ½ > 20 days). The base line characters and outcomes of surgery and pathological responses were compared between these groups. Results: Optimal cytoredcution was possible in 19/21(90.4%) patients in group 1, 6/10(60%) in group 2 & 2/9(22.2%) in group 3. Clinical complete response was found in 12/21 (57.1%), 2/10(20%) & 0/9(0%) respectively. Progressive disease was noted in 4/9(44%) of group 3 patients. There was striking differences between the groups with respect to clinical and pathological response. Conclusion: In summary, CA 125 elimination half life measurement is a reproducible tool that can be used to assess chemotherapy sensitivity in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The CA 125 half life value is a helpful measurement that allows the clinicians to measure the degree of chemosensitivity prior to cytoreductive surgery.


2016 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 717-718
Author(s):  
Alexi A. Wright ◽  
Kari Bohlke ◽  
Deborah K. Armstrong ◽  
Michael A. Bookman ◽  
William A. Cliby ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ross F. Harrison ◽  
Scott B. Cantor ◽  
Charlotte C. Sun ◽  
Mariana Villanueva ◽  
Shannon N. Westin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Ioana Braicu ◽  
Bhavana Pothuri ◽  
Jose Alejandro Pérez-Fidalgo ◽  
David O’malley ◽  
Brigitte Honhon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document