scholarly journals Bone Scan Index: A Quantitative Treatment Response Biomarker for Castration-Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 519-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth R. Dennis ◽  
Xiaoyu Jia ◽  
Irina S. Mezheritskiy ◽  
Ryan D. Stephenson ◽  
Heiko Schoder ◽  
...  

Purpose There is currently no imaging biomarker for metastatic prostate cancer. The bone scan index (BSI) is a promising candidate, being a reproducible, quantitative expression of tumor burden seen on bone scintigraphy. Prior studies have shown the prognostic value of a baseline BSI. This study tested whether treatment-related changes in BSI are prognostic for survival and compared BSI to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as an outcome measure. Patients and Methods We retrospectively examined serial bone scans from patients with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer (CRMPC) enrolled in four clinical trials. We calculated BSI at baseline and at 3 and 6 months on treatment and performed univariate and bivariate analyses of PSA, BSI, and survival. Results Eighty-eight patients were scanned, 81 of whom have died. In the univariate analysis, the log percent change in BSI from baseline to 3 and 6 months on treatment prognosticated for survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.44; P = .0089 and HR, 2.54; P < .001, respectively). A doubling in BSI resulted in a 1.9-fold increase in risk of death. Log percent change in PSA at 6 months on treatment was also associated with survival (HR, 1.298; P = .013). In the bivariate analysis, change in BSI while adjusting for PSA was prognostic at 3 and 6 months on treatment (HR, 2.368; P = .012 and HR, 2.226; P = .002, respectively), but while adjusting for BSI, PSA was not prognostic. Conclusion These data furnish early evidence that on-treatment changes in BSI are a response indicator and support further exploration of bone scintigraphy as an imaging biomarker in CRMPC.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16600-e16600
Author(s):  
Aseem Anand ◽  
Stephanie Daignault ◽  
Luke T. Nordquist ◽  
Jorge Ramos ◽  
Rohit K. Jain ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. e596-e596
Author(s):  
Suguru Kadomoto ◽  
Kouji Izumi ◽  
Takahiro Nohara ◽  
Konaka Hiroyuki ◽  
Yoshifumi Kadono ◽  
...  

e596 Background: It was ambiguous till now to evaluate the change of bone metastasis by various treatments. To quantify the change of bone metastases by enzalutamide, abiraterone, and docetaxel for the castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with bone metastases (bmCRPC), we employed Bone Scan Index (BSI) on bone scintigraphy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the change of PSA and bone metastases of CRPC patients who were treated with enzalutamide (Enz), abiraterone (Abi) and/or docetaxel (DOC) in our hospital. All patients underwent Tc-99m MDP bone scintigraphy. The degree of bone metastases was analyzed using BSI, which was calculated by BONENAVI (FUJIFILM RI Pharma, Japan; EXINIbone, EXINI Diagnostics, Sweden). 19 patients were treated with enzalutamide (8 cases: pre-docetaxel, 11 cases: post-docetaxel). The median PSA of patients treated with Enz was 12.64 ng/ml (1.63-199 ng/ml). And 11 patients were treated with abiraterone (5 cases: pre-docetaxel, 6 cases: post-docetaxel). The median PSA of patients treated with Abi was 26.37 ng/ml (2.29-199 ng/ml). Results: We observed decline of PSA in 18/30 cases (9 cases: pre-DOC, 9 cases: post-DOC). Decline of PSA to 50% or more was observed in 14 cases. In contrast, decline of BSI was observed in 53.3% (16/30) cases and decline of PSA to 25% or more was observed in only 6 cases. BSI decreased in 84.6% (11/13) of pre-DOC setting and in 29.4% (5/17) of post-DOC setting indicating that change of BSI was poor in post-DOC setting. However, DOC had already decreased BSI in 91.7% (11/12) before Abi or Enz treatment. Moreover, the average rate of BSI decline in the patients that BSI decreased by DOC was better than the patients that BSI decreased by Abi/Enz (-48.46% vs -28.56%). Finally, although the rate of BSI change by Enz was weakly correlated with the rate of PSA decline (y = 0.3906x + 25.35, R2 = 0.3423), BSI continued to increase in four cases in spite of PSA decline. Conclusions: BSI using BONENAVI on bone scintigraphy was helpful for evaluating the effectiveness of treatment and following-up of bmCRPC.


Oncotarget ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (48) ◽  
pp. 84449-84458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongyang Li ◽  
Hang Lv ◽  
Xuanyu Hao ◽  
Yudi Dong ◽  
Huixu Dai ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5044-5044
Author(s):  
Aseem Anand ◽  
David Minarik ◽  
Reza Kaboteh ◽  
Sarah Lindgren Belal ◽  
Mariana Reza ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 226-226
Author(s):  
Aseem Anand ◽  
Michael J. Morris ◽  
Steven M. Larson ◽  
Mattias Ohlsson ◽  
Andreas Joseffson ◽  
...  

226 Background: The automated BSI (auto-BSI) is a computerized means of quantitatively expressing tumor burden in bone. Following the analytical validation of auto-BSI, we are now clinically qualifying the tool as a response biomarker in mCRPC. In the present study, we assess the association of auto-BSI and that of PSA with overall survival (OS) in mCRPC patients (pts) being treated with enzalutamide. Methods: All mCRPC pts who initiated enzalutamide treatment at Skåne Hospital, Sweden and at Rigshospitalet, Denmark, with a minimum of one year follow-up, were eligible for the study. Eligible mCRPC pts with baseline (BL) bone scan available before starting enzalutamide were enrolled in the study. PSA, hemoglobin (Hgb) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were obtained at BL. Treatment follow-up PSA and auto-BSI were obtained at week-12. auto-BSI was obtained using the analytically validated EXIN boneBSIversion 2.0. Cox regression and concordance index (c-index) were used to evaluate the association with OS. Results: 80 mCRPC pts with BL bone scans were enrolled in the study. Treatment follow-up bone scans were available from 62 pts. Univariate analysis demonstrated that auto-BSI, PSA, ALP and Hgb at BL were associated with OS (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, only auto-BSI and HgB were significantly associated with OS. The auto-BSI showed the highest c-index in prediction of OS (c-index 0.72, SE 0.03). Adding auto-BSI to the BL covariate model significantly improved the discrimination from c-index 0.67 to 0.72 (p < 0.05). At treatment follow-up, the univariate analysis of the change in auto-BSI and the percent change in PSA were strongly associated with OS with c-index 0.76 and 0.72 (SE 0.05), respectively. In bivariate analysis, the change in auto-BSI remained strongly associated with OS (p < 0.0001) whereas the percent change in PSA appeared to be less so (p = 0.07). Conclusions: Auto-BSI and its change demonstrated an independent and a strong association with OS in mCRPC pts being treated with enzalutamide. The study serve as a foundation for prospective validation of auto-BSI as an imaging biomarker indicative of efficacy to enzalutamide.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document