Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab (STEPP), a Phase II, Open-Label, Randomized Trial Evaluating the Impact of a Pre-Emptive Skin Treatment Regimen on Skin Toxicities and Quality of Life in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1351-1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario E. Lacouture ◽  
Edith P. Mitchell ◽  
Bilal Piperdi ◽  
Madhavan V. Pillai ◽  
Heather Shearer ◽  
...  

Purpose Panitumumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Skin toxicities are the most common adverse events with EGFR inhibitors. This is the first study designed to examine differences between pre-emptive and reactive skin treatment for specific skin toxicities in patients with mCRC for any EGFR inhibitor. Patients and Methods Patients receiving panitumumab-containing therapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to pre-emptive or reactive treatment (after skin toxicity developed). Pre-emptive treatment included use of skin moisturizers, sunscreen, topical steroid, and doxycycline. The primary end point of the study was the incidence of protocol-specified ≥ grade 2 skin toxicities during the 6-week skin treatment period. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed with the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Results Of 95 enrolled patients, 48 received pre-emptive treatment, and 47 received reactive treatment. The incidence of protocol-specified ≥ grade 2 skin toxicities during the 6-week skin treatment period was 29% and 62% for the pre-emptive and reactive groups, respectively. Mean DLQI score change from baseline to week 3 was 1.3 points and 4.2 points in the pre-emptive and reactive groups, respectively. Conclusion The pre-emptive skin treatment regimen was well tolerated. The incidence of specific ≥ grade 2 skin toxicities during the 6-week skin treatment period was reduced by more than 50% in the pre-emptive group compared with the reactive group. Patients in the pre-emptive group reported less QOL impairment than patients in the reactive group.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 541-541
Author(s):  
Ichiro Iwanaga ◽  
Yoshito Komatsu ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Yoshimitsu Kobayashi ◽  
Naoya Sakamoto ◽  
...  

541 Background: Panitumumab (Pmab), a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the EGFR, has been demonstrated the efficacy in patients with KRASwild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Though STEPP study (Lacouture et al, JCO 2010) showed that pre-emptive skin treatment reduced skin toxicities compared with reactive treatment among patients receiving Pmab, the data of Asians has not been reported. We planned a randomized controlled open-label trial to verify the differences between pre-emptive and reactive treatment for skin toxicities in Japanese patients. Methods: Patients receiving Pmab-containing treatments as third line regimen for mCRC were randomly assigned 1:1 to pre-emptive or reactive skin treatment group. In the pre-emptive treatment group, patients received skin moisturizers, sunscreen, topical steroid and minocycline. In the reactive treatment group, patients received only skin moisturizers. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of ≥ grade 2 skin toxicities during the 6-week treatment period. Retrospectively, dermatologist reviewed skin toxicities with photographs in blinded manner. Results: Out of 95 enrolled patients, 47 patients were randomly assigned to pre-emptive group, and 48 to reactive group. The incidence of ≥ grade 2 skin toxicities during the 6-week treatment period (according to investigator’s assessment) was 21.3% and 62.5% (risk ratio [RR] = 0.34, 95% CI 0.19 - 0.62; p<0.001) for the pre-emptive and reactive treatment groups, respectively. A similar trend was observed in central review by dermatologist (18.6% and 50.0%, respectively [RR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.19 - 0.74; p = 0.002]). The concordance rate between them was 75.8%. Median time to first occurrence of ≥ grade 2 skin toxicities was not reached in the pre-emptive group and 3.2 weeks (95% CI 1.9 - 6.1) in reactive group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The pre-emptive skin treatment could reduce the severity of the skin toxicities during the Pmab treatment. Our data clearly validate that the pre-emptive treatment is also recommended in Japanese patients. Clinical trial information: 000004883.


2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 3007-3015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele De Tursi ◽  
Marinella Zilli ◽  
Consiglia Carella ◽  
Matteo Auriemma ◽  
Maria Nadia Lisco ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Conroy ◽  
M Hebbar ◽  
J Bennouna ◽  
M Ducreux ◽  
M Ychou ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 5911-5924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Battaglin ◽  
Alberto Puccini ◽  
Selma Ahcene Djaballah ◽  
Heinz-Josef Lenz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document