Oxaliplatin Combined With Weekly Bolus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin As Surgical Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II and III Colon Cancer: Results From NSABP C-07

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (16) ◽  
pp. 2198-2204 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Philip Kuebler ◽  
H. Samuel Wieand ◽  
Michael J. O'Connell ◽  
Roy E. Smith ◽  
Linda H. Colangelo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Wall Thickening ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose This phase III clinical trial evaluated the impact on disease-free survival (DFS) of adding oxaliplatin to bolus weekly fluorouracil (FU) combined with leucovorin as surgical adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer. Patients and Methods Patients who had undergone a potentially curative resection were randomly assigned to either FU 500 mg/m2 intravenous (IV) bolus weekly for 6 weeks plus leucovorin 500 mg/m2 IV weekly for 6 weeks during each 8-week cycle for three cycles (FULV), or the same FULV regimen with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV administered on weeks 1, 3, and 5 of each 8-week cycle for three cycles (FLOX). Results A total of 2,407 patients (96.6%) of the 2,492 patients randomly assigned were eligible. Median follow-up for patients still alive is 42.5 months. The hazard ratio (FLOX v FULV) is 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.93), a 20% risk reduction in favor of FLOX (P < .004). The 3- and 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 71.8% and 67.0% for FULV and 76.1% and 73.2% for FLOX, respectively. Grade 3 neurosensory toxicity was noted in 8.2% of patients receiving FLOX and in 0.7% of those receiving FULV (P < .001). Hospitalization for diarrhea associated with bowel wall thickening occurred in 5.5% of the patients receiving FLOX and in 3.0% of the patients receiving FULV (P < .01). A total of 1.2% of patients died as a result of any cause within 60 days of receiving chemotherapy, with no significant difference between regimens. Conclusion The addition of oxaliplatin to weekly FULV significantly improved DFS in patients with stage II and III colon cancer. FLOX can be recommended as an effective option in clinical practice.

Semimonthly Versus Monthly Regimen of Fluorouracil and Leucovorin Administered for 24 or 36 Weeks as Adjuvant Therapy in Stage II and III Colon Cancer: Results of a Randomized Trial

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (15) ◽  
pp. 2896-2903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry André ◽  
Philippe Colin ◽  
Christophe Louvet ◽  
Erik Gamelin ◽  
Olivier Bouche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose: This randomized, 2 × 2 factorial study compared a semimonthly (LVFU2) with a monthly (FULV) regimen of fluorouracil and leucovorin and 24 versus 36 weeks of each regimen as adjuvant treatment of patients with stage II (Dukes’ B2) and III (Dukes’ C) colon cancer. Patients and Methods: LVFU2 was administered semi-monthly for 2 consecutive days as dl- or l-leucovorin (200 or 100 mg/m2, respectively) as a 2-hour infusion, followed by a 400 mg/m2 FU bolus and 600 mg/m2 of FU as a 22-hour continuous infusion. FULV was administered monthly for 5 consecutive days as a 15-minute infusion of dl- or l-leucovorin, followed by 400 mg/m2 of FU as a 15-minute infusion. Results: A total of 905 patients were randomly assigned. The median follow-up was 41 months. Disease-free survival was similar between the LVFU2 and FULV groups (127 v 124 events; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04; P = .74) and between 24 and 36 weeks of therapy (128 v 123 events; HR = 0.94; P = .63). Analysis of overall survival showed a slight excess in the number of deaths in LVFU2 compared with FULV (73 v 59), but this difference was not statistically significant (HR = 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.90 to 1.78; P = .18). The most commonly observed grade 3 to 4 toxicities were neutropenia, diarrhea, and mucositis. Toxicities were significantly lower in the LVFU2 group (all toxicities, P < .001). Conclusion: Our data confirm that LVFU2 is less toxic than FULV. At a median follow-up of 41 months, no statistically significant difference could be detected in disease-free or overall survival between the treatment groups or treatment durations.

Phase III Study of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy Compared With Chemotherapy Alone in the Surgical Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer: Results of Intergroup Protocol 0130

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 3277-3283 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Martenson ◽  
Christopher G. Willett ◽  
Daniel J. Sargent ◽  
James A. Mailliard ◽  
John H. Donohue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Chemotherapy Patients ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose Some patients with colon cancer have a high risk of local recurrence postoperatively. This trial was undertaken to determine whether radiation therapy added to an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen improves outcome in high-risk patients. Patients and Methods Patients with resected colon cancer with tumor adherence or invasion of surrounding structures, or with T3N1 or T3N2 tumors of the ascending or descending colon were randomly assigned to receive fluorouracil and levamisole therapy with or without radiation therapy. Patients who received chemotherapy and radiation therapy (chemoRT) received 45 to 50.4 Gy in 25 to 28 fractions beginning 28 days after starting chemotherapy. Patient enrollment was terminated because of slow accrual after 222 patients enrolled (original goal was 700 patients); 187 patients were assessable. Results Overall 5-year survival was 62% for chemotherapy patients and 58% for chemoRT patients (P > .50); 5-year disease-free survival was 51% for both groups (P > .50). Toxicity (≥ grade 3) occurred in 42% of chemotherapy patients and 54% of chemoRT patients (P = .04). Leukopenia (≥ grade 3) occurred in 10% of chemotherapy patients and 22% of chemoRT patients (P = .02). No significant difference in nonhematologic toxicity (≥ grade 3) was observed between chemoRT and chemotherapy patients (35% v 44%; P = .26). Conclusion Patients who received chemotherapy or chemoRT had similar overall survival and disease-free survival. Toxicity was higher among chemoRT patients. These results must be interpreted with caution because of the high number of ineligible patients and the limited power of the study to detect potentially meaningful differences.

Effect of a Shortened Duration of FOLFOX Chemotherapy on the Survival Rate of Patients with Stage II and III Colon Cancer

Chemotherapy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woong Bae Ji ◽  
Kwang Dae Hong ◽  
Jung-Sik Kim ◽  
Sung-Yup Joung ◽  
Jun Won Um ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Folfox Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free

Background: FOLFOX chemotherapy is widely used as an adjuvant treatment for advanced colon cancer. The duration of adjuvant chemotherapy is usually set to 6 months, which is based on a former study of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy. However, the FOLFOX regimen is known to have complications, such as peripheral neuropathy. The aim of this study was to compare the survival rates and complications experienced by patients receiving either 4 or 6 months of FOLFOX chemotherapy. Methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed for stage II and III patients who underwent radical resection of colon cancer. We compared the 5-year survival rates and the occurrence of complications in patients who completed only 8 cycles of FOLFOX chemotherapy with patients who completed 12 cycles of chemotherapy. Results: Among 188 patients who underwent adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy for stage II or III colon cancer, 83 (44.1%) completed 6 months of FOLFOX chemotherapy and 64 (34.0%) patients discontinued after 4 months of chemotherapy. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates did not show a significant difference. Patients in the 6-month group had peripheral neuropathy more frequently (p = 0.028). Conclusions: Five-year overall and disease-free survival were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Large-scale prospective studies are necessary for the analysis of complications and survival rates.

Radiomic Signature-Based Nomogram to Predict Disease-Free Survival in Stage II and III Colon Cancer

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xun Yao ◽  
Caixia Sun ◽  
Fei Xiong ◽  
Xinyu Zhang ◽  
Chao Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Three Versus 6 Months of Oxaliplatin-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: Disease-Free Survival Results From a Randomized, Open-Label, International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant (IDEA) France, Phase III Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15) ◽  
pp. 1469-1477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry André ◽  
Dewi Vernerey ◽  
Laurent Mineur ◽  
Jaafar Bennouna ◽  
Jérôme Desrame ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose Reduction of adjuvant treatment duration may decrease toxicities without loss of efficacy in stage III colon cancer. This could offer clear advantages to patients and health care providers. Methods In International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) France, as part of the IDEA international collaboration, patient with colon cancer patients were randomly assigned to 3 and 6 months of modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6: infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) by physician choice. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS), and analyses were descriptive. Results A total of 2,010 eligible patients received either 3 or 6 months of chemotherapy (modified intention-to-treat population); 2,000 (99%) had stage III colon cancer (N1: 75%, N2: 25%); 1,809 (90%) received mFOLFOX6, and 201 (10%) received CAPOX. The median age was 64 years, and the median follow-up time was 4.3 years. Overall, 94% (3 months) and 78% (6 months) of patients completed treatment (fluoropyrimidines ± oxaliplatin). Maximal grade 2 and 3 neuropathy rates were 28% and 8% in the 3-month arm and 41% and 25% in the 6-month arm ( P < .001). Final rates of residual neuropathy greater than grade 1 were 3% in the 3-month arm and 7% in the 6-month arm ( P < .001). There were 578 DFS events: 314 and 264 in the 3- and 6-month arms, respectively. The 3-year DFS rates were 72% and 76% in the 3- and 6-month arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.46; P = .0112). In the 3 and 6-month arms, respectively, for patients who received mFOLFOX6, the 3-year DFS rates were 72% and 76% (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.51); for the T4 and/or N2 population, they were 58% and 66% (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.82); and for the T1-3N1 population, they were 81% and 83% (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.49). Conclusion IDEA France, in which 90% of patients received mFOLFOX6, shows superiority of 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 3 months, especially in the T4 and/or N2 subgroups. These results should be considered alongside the international IDEA collaboration data.

Oxaliplatin/5FU/LV in adjuvant colon cancer: Updated efficacy results of the MOSAIC trial, including survival, with a median follow-up of six years

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4007-4007 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. de Gramont ◽  
C. Boni ◽  
M. Navarro ◽  
J. Tabernero ◽  
T. Hickish ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Significant Benefit ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Resected Stage ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Disease Free

4007 Background: The MOSAIC study was designed to evaluate the effects of the FOLFOX4 regimen (5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin) on 3- year disease free survival (DFS) probability in patients with stage II and III colon cancer. Methods: Patients (n=2246) with completely resected stage II (40%) or III (60%) colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive 5-FU/LV (LV5FU2) or FOLFOX4 every 2 weeks for 12 cycles. Results: Results for the primary endpoint of the study (for the overall population, with a median follow-up [FU] of 3 years), showed a significant benefit in DFS for the FOLFOX4-treated patients (78.2% vs 72.9%; HR: 0.77, p=0.002) (André et al, NEJM, 2004). Patients were followed beyond the 3-year cut-off for DFS and overall survival (OS) updates. Final DFS, at 5 years FU, are consistent with earlier results (HR: 0.80, p = 0.003). In addition, at a median FU of 6 years, the study demonstrates a significant benefit in OS for the stage III patients. Summary of OS results (median FU 6 years) Long-term safety update shows no increase in the rate of secondary cancer (5.0% in both treatment arms). Conclusions: These results confirm the benefit of the FOLFOX4 regimen in adjuvant colon cancer patients. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase III study of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel given every 3 weeks or weekly in operable breast cancer: Results of Intergroup Trial E1199

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 516-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Sparano ◽  
M. Wang ◽  
S. Martino ◽  
V. Jones ◽  
E. Perez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

516 Background: Evidence suggests that docetaxel is more effective than paclitaxel, and paclitaxel is more effective when given weekly than every 3 weeks in metastatic breast cancer (BC). Methods: Eligibility included axillary lymph node positive or high-risk (tumor at least 2 cm) node-negative BC. All patients received 4 cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks, followed by either: (1) paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks × 4 (P3), (2) paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly × 12 (P1), (3) docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks × 4 (D3), or (4) docetaxel 35 mg/m2 weekly × 12 (D1). The primary comparisons included taxane (P vs. D) and schedule (every 3 weeks vs. weekly), and secondary comparisons included P3 vs. other arms. The trial had 86% power to detect a 17.5% decrease in disease-free survival (DFS) for either primary comparison, and 80% power to detect a 22% decrease for the secondary comparisons (2-sided nomimal 5% level tests corrected for multiple comparisons). Results: A total of 4,950 eligible patients were accrued. There was no difference in the primary comparisons afer 856 DFS events and 483 deaths after a median follow-up of 46.5 months at the 4th interim analysis ( www.sabcs.org , abstract 48). This is the final pre-specified analysis for the primary comparisons after 1,042 DFS events and 650 deaths (with 1,020 DFS events at this time, to be updated at the meeting). After a median followup of 60.2 months, there remains no significant difference in the hazard ratio (HR) for the taxane (1.02; p=0.73) or schedule (1.07; p=0.30) (as in the first analysis). In secondary comparisons of the standard arm (P3) with the other arms (HR > 1 favoring the experimental arms), the HRs were 1.30 (p = 0.003) for arm P1, 1.24 (p=0.02) for arm D3, and 1.09 (p=0.33) for arm D1. Analysis of interaction by hormone-receptor status will be presented. The incidence of worst grade toxicity (grade 3/4) was 24%/6% for arm P3, 24%/3% for arm P1, 21%/50% for arm D3, and 38%/6% for arm D1. Conclusions: There were no differences in DFS when comparing taxane or schedule overall. DFS was significantly improved in the weekly paclitaxel and every 3-week docetaxel arms compared with the every 3-week paclitaxel arm. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document