Cloretazine (VNP40101M), a Novel Sulfonylhydrazine Alkylating Agent, in Patients Age 60 Years or Older With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis Giles ◽  
David Rizzieri ◽  
Judith Karp ◽  
Norbert Vey ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Alkylating Agent ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose Cloretazine (VNP40101M) is a sulfonylhydrazine alkylating agent with significant antileukemia activity. A multicenter phase II study of cloretazine was conducted in patients 60 years of age or older with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Patients and Methods Cloretazine 600 mg/m2 was administered as a single intravenous infusion. Patients were stratified by age, performance score, cytogenetic risk category, type of AML, and comorbidity. Results One hundred four patients, median age 72 years (range, 60 to 84 years), were treated on study. Performance status was 2 in 31 patients (30%) and no patient had a favorable karyotype. Forty-seven patients (45%) had cardiac disease, 25 patients (24%) had hepatic disease, and 19 patients (18%) had pulmonary disease, defined as per the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation–Specific Comorbidity Index, at study entry. The overall response rate was 32%, with 29 patients (28%) achieving complete response (CR) and four patients (4%) achieving CR with incomplete platelet recovery. Response rates in 44 de novo AML patients, 45 secondary AML patients, and 15 high-risk MDS patients were 50%, 11%, and 40%, respectively. Response by cytogenetic risk category was 39% in 56 patients with intermediate cytogenetic risk and 24% in 46 patients with unfavorable cytogenetic risk. Nineteen (18%) patients died within 30 days of receiving cloretazine therapy. Median overall survival was 94 days, with a 1-year survival of 14%; the median duration of survival was 147 days, with a 1-year survival of 28% for those who achieved CR. Conclusion Cloretazine has significant activity and modest extramedullary toxicity in elderly patients with AML or high-risk MDS. Response rates remain consistent despite increasing age and comorbidity.

Azacitidine With Or Without Entinostat For The Treatment Of Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasm: Further Results Of The E1905 North American Leukemia Intergroup Study

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2777-2777
Author(s):  
Thomas Prebet ◽  
Zhuoxin Sun ◽  
Rhett Ketterling ◽  
Peter L. Greenberg ◽  
Amer M. Zeidan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
North American ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
High Response ◽  
Myeloid Neoplasm ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background Therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (tMN) includes t-myelodysplasia (tMDS) and t-acute myeloid leukemia (tAML) and are serious late effects of the treatment of cancer. Prognosis of tMN is poor, related to the increased frequency of adverse cytogenetics and other clinical features which predict poor response to conventional treatment. Over the last years, azacitidine (AZA) has become the standard of treatment for high risk MDS (Silverman, JCO 2002; Fenaux, Lancet Oncol 2009) and has shown efficacy in AML. AZA represents an interesting option for patients with tMN considering its safety profile and its efficacy in poor prognosis subgroups of apparently de novo MDS patients including those with monosomy 7. Most prospective trials of AZA have excluded patients with tMN. Most tMN data are retrospective or registry studies (Bally, Leuk Res 2013). This abstract presents the results of 47 t-MN patients prospectively enrolled as a specific cohort in the E1905 study. Methods E1905 study is a randomized phase 2 study from the North American Leukemia Intergroup (NCT00313586, Prebet , ASH 2010) testing 10 days of AZA (50mg/m2/d s.c.) vs. 10 days of AZA + the histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat (4 mg/m2/d PO days 3 and day 10). 6 cycles of treatment were planned; responding patients could receive up to 24 cycles. MDS, CMML, and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes were included. Patients with tMN were subsequently accrued as a separate cohort after amendment of the protocol. Response was assessed using IWG 2000 criteria (Cheson et al, Blood 2000); the primary endpoint of the overall trial was achievement of a normal hemogram in 25% of treated patients in either treatment arm. Results A total of 47 patients were included. Median age was 70 years (39y-83y), 45% male, and 94% of patients had ECOG PS 0-1. 29 patients could be subclassified as t-MDS and 18 as t-AML. At inclusion, median peripheral blood counts were: neutrophils 1.0 G/l, Platelets 35 G/L, Hemoglobin 9.2 g/l, peripheral blood blasts 0%, marrow blasts 14.0%. 68% of patients were RBC transfusion dependent and 40% platelet transfusion dependent. As expected, the cytogenetic evaluation showed a high frequency of unfavorable risk cytogenetics (74%) as compared to normal or intermediate risk cytogenetics (26%). Baseline characteristics were not statistically different between the 2 arms. 24 patients were treated with AZA monotherapy and 23 with AZA+entinostat. The median number of administered cycles was 4 and was significantly higher in patients treated with AZA monotherapy (6 cycles vs.3 cycles, p=0.008). 8 patients in the combination arm and 1 patient in the AZA monotherapy arm died of infection or hemorrhage before cycle 3. In an intent to treat analysis, overall response rates (CR, PR, or trilineage Hematologic improvement) were 11/24 (46%) in AZA monotherapy (95% CI 26 – 67%) and 4/23 (17%) in the combination arm (95% CI 5 – 39%, p=0.06 comparing the two arms). Median overall survival in the two arms were 12.8 months and 5.7 months (p=0.008). Conclusions In this group of very high risk patients with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, the use of the novel 50 * 10 schedule of azacitidine monotherapy appears effective, with response rates comparable to those for patients with de novo MDS/AML treated on the same protocol (74 pts, 40% with unfavorable cytogenetics, ORR=32%, median OS=18 months). Because there are no prospective data examining the approved dose schedule of AZA (75 mg/m2/day * 7 days), it is not clear if this surprisingly high response rate derives from the current extended schedule of lower dose AZA, or would be true with standard dose AZA as well. This high response may enable many of these patients to proceed to allogeneic stem cell transplant. Entinostat combined with azacitidine at the dose and schedule applied in E1905 does not appear to be effective and tolerable as compared to azacitidine alone. Disclosures: Prebet: CELGENE: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Use of azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia. Gore:CELGENE: Equity Ownership, Research Funding.

Single-Agent Laromustine, A Novel Alkylating Agent, Has Significant Activity in Older Patients With Previously Untreated Poor-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 815-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary J. Schiller ◽  
Susan M. O'Brien ◽  
Arnaud Pigneux ◽  
Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽  
Norbert Vey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Alkylating Agent ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Additional Risk Factor ◽  
Significant Activity ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
Poor Risk ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose An international phase II study of laromustine (VNP40101M), a sulfonylhydrazine alkylating agent, was conducted in patients age 60 years or older with previously untreated poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods Laromustine 600 mg/m2 was administered as a single 60-minute intravenous infusion. Patients were age 70 years or older or 60 years or older with at least one additional risk factor—unfavorable AML karyotype, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 2, and/or cardiac, pulmonary, or hepatic comorbidities. Results Eighty-five patients (median age, 72 years; range, 60 to 87 years) were treated. Poor-risk features included age 70 years or older, 78%; adverse karyotype, 47%; PS of 2, 41%; pulmonary disease, 77%; cardiac disease, 73%; and hepatic disease, 3%. Ninety-six percent of patients had at least two risk factors, and 39% had at least four risk factors. The overall response rate (ORR) was 32%, with 20 patients (23%) achieving complete response (CR) and seven (8%) achieving CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp). ORR was 20% in patients with adverse cytogenetics; 32% in those age 70 years or older; 32% in those with PS of 2; 32% in patients with baseline pulmonary dysfunction; 34% in patients with baseline cardiac dysfunction; and 27% in 33 patients with at least four risk factors. Twelve (14%) patients died within 30 days of receiving laromustine therapy. Median overall survival was 3.2 months, with a 1-year survival of 21%; the median duration of survival for those who achieved CR/CRp was 12.4 months, with a 1-year survival of 52%. Conclusion Laromustine has significant single-agent activity in elderly patients with poor-risk AML. Adverse events are predominantly myelosuppressive or respiratory. Response rates are consistent across a spectrum of poor-risk features.

Chemotherapy and Venetoclax in Elderly Acute Myeloid Leukemia Trial (CAVEAT): A Phase Ib Dose-Escalation Study of Venetoclax Combined With Modified Intensive Chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (30) ◽  
pp. 3506-3517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong Chyn Chua ◽  
Andrew W. Roberts ◽  
John Reynolds ◽  
Chun Yew Fong ◽  
Stephen B. Ting ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Acute Myeloid

PURPOSE The B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitor venetoclax has an emerging role in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with promising response rates in combination with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine in older patients. The tolerability and efficacy of venetoclax in combination with intensive chemotherapy in AML is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with AML who were ≥ 65 years (≥ 60 years if monosomal karyotype) and fit for intensive chemotherapy were allocated to venetoclax dose-escalation cohorts (range, 50-600 mg). Venetoclax was administered orally for 14 days each cycle. During induction, a 7-day prephase/dose ramp-up (days −6 to 0) was followed by an additional 7 days of venetoclax combined with infusional cytarabine 100 mg/m2 on days 1-5 and idarubicin 12 mg/m2 intravenously on days 2-3 (ie, 5 + 2). Consolidation (4 cycles) included 14 days of venetoclax (days −6 to 7) combined with cytarabine (days 1-2) and idarubicin (day 1). Maintenance venetoclax was permitted (7 cycles). The primary objective was to assess the optimal dose schedule of venetoclax with 5 + 2. RESULTS Fifty-one patients with a median age of 72 years (range, 63-80 years) were included. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached with venetoclax 600 mg/day. The main grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicities during induction were febrile neutropenia (55%) and sepsis (35%). In contrast to induction, platelet recovery was notably delayed during consolidation cycles. The overall response rate (complete remission [CR]/CR with incomplete count recovery) was 72%; it was 97% in de novo AML and was 43% in secondary AML. During the venetoclax prephase, marrow blast reductions (≥ 50%) were noted in NPM1-, IDH2-, and SRSF2-mutant AML. CONCLUSION Venetoclax combined with 5 + 2 induction chemotherapy was safe and tolerable in fit older patients with AML. Although the optimal postremission therapy remains to be determined, the high remission rate in de novo AML warrants additional investigation (ANZ Clinical Trial Registry No. ACTRN12616000445471).

Interim results of protracted low doses of temozolomide in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7052-7052
Author(s):  
B. C. Medeiros ◽  
J. R. Gotlib ◽  
S. E. Coutre ◽  
C. Jones ◽  
S. A. Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Normal Karyotype ◽  
Low Doses ◽  
Npm1 Mutation ◽  
Acute Myeloid

7052 Background: High treatment-related mortality and low response rates often discourage elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia from receiving treatment. Previous data demonstrate that only patients lacking expression of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGAT) in leukemic blasts are sensitive to temozolomide. Protracted exposure to low doses of temozolomide can significantly inhibit AGAT enzymatic activity. Methods: Phase II clinical trial of tailored temozolomide therapy to high-risk AML patients according to AGAT methylation promoter status. Patients demonstrating evidence of AGAT promoter methylation were stratified to conventional doses of temozolomide at 200 mg/m2 orally x 7 days. Patients demonstrating lack of AGAT promoter methylation (unmethylated) received protracted doses of temozolomide (100 mg/m2 orally x 14 days) followed by conventional doses of temozolomide. Patients who achieved CR were given up to 5 consolidation treatments. Results: Fifteen patients have completed treatment to date. The median age was 78 (68–83) and nine were male. De novo AML was diagnosed in eight patients and five patients had s-AML. Nine patients had a normal karyotype and three patients had a complex karyotype. Two patients had only a NPM1 mutation and one had NPM1mut/FLT3-ITD. In 13 patients, the AGAT promoter was found to be unmethylated. AGAT protein was present in 5/11 patients. All patients had an intact mismatch repair pathway. Thirteen patients had HCT-CI scores of 0–2. Six patients (6/13) achieved a complete remission (CR) after 1 cycle of therapy (1/2 for patients with methylated and 5/11 for patients with unmethylated AGAT promoter). Nonhematologic toxicities were minimal. Drug-related hematologic toxicities were difficult to distinguish from disease-related cytopenias. Three patients remain in CR with a median duration of 22 weeks (14–36 weeks). Seven patients have died from disease progression, while two patients died of neutropenic sepsis (early deaths). With a median follow-up of 38 weeks (10–48), the median overall survival for the entire population is 12 weeks (3.5 - 38) weeks (responders 26.5 weeks). Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that temozolomide therapy may be individually tailored to elderly patients with AML according to AGAT promoter status. [Table: see text]

Microtransplantation: HLA-Mismatched Allogeneic Cellular Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (HMMACT)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5944-5944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Mohrbacher ◽  
Ibrahim Syed ◽  
Noah Merin ◽  
Giridharan Ramsingh ◽  
Susan Groshen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cellular Therapy ◽  
Nk Cell ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Cell Phenotype ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: This clinical trial addressed feasibility and safety of microtransplantation by HLA-mismatched allogeneic cellular therapy (HMMACT) in poor risk acute myeloid leukemia patients. A secondary objective was to estimate complete response rate, infections, GVHD incidence, and induction mortality. Methods: Patients with high risk AML were enrolled: 4 were > 75 yo, 3 with MLL+ ((t(6;11), 11+ and t(10;11)), 3 complex/del7, one FLT3+. Patients received induction chemotherapy with mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2 IV for 3 days) and cytarabine (150 mg/m2 IV for 7 days) and received HLA-mismatched GCSF mobilized PBSCs on day 9 or 10. Family donors were concurrently HLA typed and best available donor underwent GCSF mobilization (5 mg/kg SQ BID x 4 days) and leukapheresis after medical evaluation and safety testing. HLA partial mismatch patients (4- 5/10 antigen) were chosen. Apheresis cells were counted and analyzed by flow cytometry for CD34+ cells; CD3+, CD4+CD25+ and CD8 + cells; and CD3-CD56+ NK cells. Target CD3 cell dose was 1 x 108/kg per cycle; cells cryopreserved as for standard stem cell donors. Family donor HLA-mismatched GCSF mobilized peripheral blood cells were infused fresh on day 9 or 10 (up to day 16), 36-50 hours after end of cytarabine. Bone marrow biopsy was evaluated on day 14 and 28 for AML remission status, and T/NK cell number. Patients achieving a complete response proceeded to consolidation with cytarabine 0.5 -1.0 gram/m2 x 6 doses with fresh or cryopreserved HMMACT cells from their donor for 2 courses a month apart. Patients: 10 patients age 31 – 80 yo consented: 8 received allo cells; 1 screen failure (no haplo family member identified); 1 patient too ill after initiating chemo to collect donor. Eight patients received at least one course of HMMACT; 1 withdrew early due to AML progression, a second for poor performance status. Three patients had de novo AML; 5 patients had secondary AML. Six Patients had2 or more cycles of HMMACT: four achieved CR: Pt 1 and 4 received 3 cycles, Pt 2 and 6 received 2 cycles of cell infusions and all achieved CR. Pt 9 received 2 inductions with cells, and sustained a partial clinical remission for 6 months. Two Patients had 1 cycle of HMMACT:Pt 3: received 1 cycle cells, but response not assessed; Pt 8: received 1 cycle cells, and achieved CR 3+mos but declined further therapy. Safety: Acute reactions to cell infusions were minimal. Delayed reactions attributed to cell infusions included fever grade 1-2, rash grade 1-2, diarrhea grade 1-2 resolving in 7-10 days. Patients with prior MDS or refractory leukemia requiring 2 inductions had a longer time to ANC and platelet recovery. Feasibility: Two patients had no donor; 2 donors only collected enough for 2 cell infusions. Response: 5/8 pts receiving cells had CR/CRi (62.5%) lasting 3 to 10+ months. Conclusions: Although there were the usual significant complications of treating leukemia and infections, the cellular therapy itself was well-tolerated. Patients often had fevers in first week after cell infusions, or experienced transient rash and diarrhea in the same time period, which were self resolving in all cases and may reflect elimination of allogeneic cells by the patient’s immune system. No patient developed GVHD. Feasibility of obtaining family donors was as expected for this diverse US population. Infectious complications were low by AML treatment standards. Complete remission rates are encouraging, but not as durable as hoped, likely reflecting the fact that all of our patients had high risk cytogenetics in contrast to the prior published studies by Chinese investigators. The majority were elderly who would not otherwise be offered intensive therapy. Family donors achieved expected cell targets and tolerated mobilization/collection procedures well. All but one patient receiving 2 to 3 cycles achieved complete remission. Two elderly patients who received one or two cell infusions during induction sustained prolonged survival of 6 months in spite of no further therapy, one achieving a CR and the other a sustained PR. Neutrophil and platelet recoveries tended to follow the pattern of the patient's prior secondary leukemia or myelodysplastic disorder. Once patients achieved complete remission however, recovery of blood counts was relatively rapid on further cycles of consolidation. We are now assessing Treg, T and NK cell phenotype of patient and donor cells by flow cyAtometry as biological correlates. Disclosures Chaudhary: University of Southern California: Inventor on a patent application relevant to this work filed to US patent office (No. 62/031,053). Patents & Royalties.

scholarly journals Rebound Thrombocytosis following Induction Chemotherapy Is an Independent Predictor of a Good Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Attaining First Complete Remission

2015 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umit Yavuz Malkan ◽  
Gursel Gunes ◽  
Ayse Isik ◽  
Eylem Eliacik ◽  
Sezgin Etgul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Good Prognosis ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Acute Myeloid

There are very few data about the relationship between acute myeloid leukemia (AML) prognosis and bone marrow recovery kinetics following chemotherapy. In this study, we aimed to assess the prognostic importance and clinical associations of neutrophil and platelet recovery rates and rebound thrombocytosis (RT) or neutrophilia (RN) in the postchemotherapy period for newly diagnosed AML patients. De novo AML patients diagnosed between October 2002 and December 2013 were evaluated retrospectively. One hundred patients were suitable for inclusion. Cox regression analysis using need for reinduction chemotherapy as a stratification parameter revealed RT as the only parameter predictive of OS, with borderline statistical significance (p = 0.06, OR = 7; 95% CI 0.92-53), and it was the only parameter predictive of DFS (p = 0.024, OR = 10; 95% CI 1.3-75). In order to understand whether RT or RN was related to a better marrow capacity or late consolidation, we considered neutrophil recovery time and platelet recovery time and nadir-first consolidation durations in all patients in the cohort. Both the marrow recovery duration and the time between marrow aplasia and first consolidation were shorter in RT and RN patients. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report a correlation between RT/RN and prognosis in AML.

scholarly journals The Hypomethylating Agent Decitabine Prior to Chemotherapy Improves the Therapy Efficacy in Refractory/Relapsed Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4932-4932
Author(s):  
Xuejie Jiang ◽  
Zhixiang Wang ◽  
Changxin Yin ◽  
Guopan Yu ◽  
Jieyu Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Western Blotting ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cytotoxic Effect ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
Hypomethylating Agent ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Introduction. Most acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with adverse prognosis either fail to achieve complete remission (CR) or relapse after short-term remission, new strategies are needed to improve therapeutic effect in these patients. Gene silencing via DNA methylation are frequent and reversible in high-risk AML, it provides the possibility to treat AML patients with DNA-hypomethylating agent. Decitabine alone has limited anti-leukemia effect and minimal toxicity. Studies demonstrated that decitabine prior to chemotherapy was likely to increase efficacy in AML. In this study, we investigated the effect of decitabine on susceptibility to cytotoxic drugs in chemoresistant AML cells. Efficacy and safety of decitabine prior to HAA regimen was evaluated in refractory, relapsed and high-risk AML patients. Methods. HL60, HL60/ADR, Kasumi-1, and primary AML cells were pre-treated with 1.0 μM decitabine for 72 hours, Sensitivities to harringtonine, adriamycin, cytarabine and the combination was determined by MTT, apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry. Protein expression was detected by western blotting. In clinic, Twenty-three patients were enrolled in decitabine prior to HAA regimen, and twenty-four patients in HAA alone. CR ratio was used to evaluate efficacy. Durations of neutrocytopenia or thrombcytopemia and infection incidence were observed to assess the safety. All of patients were followed up to 36 monthes, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated. Result. Decitabine increased sensitivity and apoptosis induced by harringtonine in HL60/ADR, as well as adriamycin and cytarabine in HL60/ADR and Kasumi-1 cells. But no change in sensitivity to each drug was observed in HL60, and sensitivity to harringtonine in Kasumi-1. The similar changes in sensitivity to adriamycin and cytarabine were also observed in primary AML cells from refractory patients (n=6). Cytotoxic effect of HAA was alsoincreaed by decitabine in HL60/ADR and Kasumi-1 cells (p=0.004, 0.018). Western blotting showed that decitabine decreased expression of DNMT1, activation of p53 and inhibition of c-Myc, Survivin and Bcl-2. In clinic, 16 (69.6%) patients in decitabine plus HAA regimen responded to the first course of induction therapy: 14 CR (60.9%) and 2 PR (8.7%). 1 in 2 patients with PR achieved CR after second course induction. It brought the overall CR was 65.2%. Otherwise, 10 (45.8%) patients in HAA regimen alone responded to the first induction: 7 CR (29.2%) and 4 PR (16.7%), 3 in 4 patients with PR achieved CR after the second induction, and overall CR reached 41.7%. The first-cycle CR ratio in decitabine plus HAA was higher than that in HAA alone (p=0.041). Patients continued to receive chemotherapy alternatively combined with decitabine. The median OS was 14 months in chemotherapy plus decitabine, 6 months in chemotherapy alone, and median DFS were 18 and 5 months in the former and latter. No significant difference was observed in the time of neutrophil (p=0.832, 0.631) or platelet recovery (p=0.798, 0.544) after induction and intensification therapy. The incidences of infection were also similar (p=0.724, 0.697). The clinic data indicated that decitabine plus HAA regimenit was efficacy and well-tolerated to treat refractory AML patients. Conclusion. Our results demonstrated that decitabine increased cytotoxic effect against chemoresistant AML cells. Combination of decitabine and HAA was safe and efficacy to treat refractory/relapsed AML. These findings support clinic protocols based on decitabine prior to chemotherapy to overcome resistance and improve therapeutic efficacy in AML patients. Disclosures Carter: PrismBiolab: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document