Prevention and Treatment of Dysphagia and Aspiration After Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (17) ◽  
pp. 2636-2643 ◽  
Author(s):  
David I. Rosenthal ◽  
Jan S. Lewin ◽  
Avraham Eisbruch
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Swallowing Disorders ◽  
Head And Neck Cancers ◽  
Swallowing Function ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Complex Events

Safe, successful swallowing depends on complex events affected by head and neck cancers and their treatment. This article reviews the swallowing process, how it is affected by chemoradiotherapy, and the evaluation, prevention, and treatment of swallowing disorders. Specific recommendations are made to promote maintenance and recovery of swallowing function.

scholarly journals Perioperative mortality of head and neck cancers

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannan Wang ◽  
Mengxue Wang ◽  
Yan Tang ◽  
Bincan Sun ◽  
Kai Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Arrest ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Cancers ◽  
Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Perioperative Mortality ◽  
Advanced Clinical Stage

Abstract Background Head and neck cancers are aggressive cancers, most clinical studies focused on the prognosis of patients with head and neck cancer. However, perioperative mortality was rarely mentioned. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed using all head and neck cancer patients admitting in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from January 2010 to December 2019. The analysis of overall survival and progression-free survival were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and cross tabulation with chi-squared testing was applied to analyze the difference in parameters between groups. Results From January 2010 to December 2019, a total of 6576 patients with head and neck cancers were admitted to our department and 7 died in the hospital, all of whom were middle-aged and elderly patients including 6 males and 1 female. The perioperative mortality rate (POMR) was about 1‰. The causes of death included acute heart failure, rupture of large blood vessels in the neck, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy due to asphyxia, respiratory failure and cardiopulmonary arrest. Conclusion Preoperative radiotherapy, previous chemotherapy, hypertension, diabetes, advanced clinical stage and postoperative infection are risk factors for perioperative mortality of head and neck cancer.

scholarly journals Postoperative Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-51
Author(s):  
Vedang Murthy ◽  
Sayan Kundu ◽  
Tanweer Shahid ◽  
Ashwini Budrukkar ◽  
Tejpal Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Head And Neck Cancers ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Locoregional Failure

Abstract Though early stage head and neck cancers can be cured either by surgery or radiation, patients with locally advanced disease continues to pose a therapeutic challenge. Locoregional failure is the major cause of death in head and neck cancers. As the outcome of locally advanced head and neck cancer is less than promising, a combined modality approach is generally undertaken in this group of patients. The combination of surgery, radiation and more recently, chemotherapy and targeted therapy can improve outcomes in locally advanced head and neck cancer patients. This overview discusses the rationale and role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in advanced head and neck cancers, the radiotherapy technique in brief and methods of enhancing the efficacy of postoperative RT by altering the fractionation schedules and adding chemotherapy and targeted therapy.

scholarly journals Times to Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer Before and During COVID-19

OTO Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473974X2110594
Author(s):  
Peter Yao ◽  
Victoria Cooley ◽  
William Kuhel ◽  
Andrew Tassler ◽  
Victoria Banuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Head And Neck Cancers ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Time To Treatment ◽  
Time To Diagnosis ◽  
The Times

Objective The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has reduced the demand for, and supply of, head and neck cancer services. This study compares the times to diagnosis, staging, and treatment of head and neck cancers before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary academic medical center in New York City (NYC). Methods The times to diagnosis, staging, and treatment of head and neck cancer for patients presenting to the clinics of 4 head and neck oncology surgeons with newly diagnosed head and neck cancers were compared between pre–COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods. Results Sixty-eight patients in the pre–COVID-19 period and 26 patients in the COVID-19 period presented with newly diagnosed head and neck cancer. Patients in the COVID-19 group had a significantly longer time to diagnosis than the pre–COVID-19 group after adjustment for age and cancer diagnosis ( P = .02; hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32-0.92). Patients in the pre–COVID-19 and COVID-19 groups had no statistically significant differences in time to staging ( P > .9; HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.58-1.74) or time to treatment ( P = .12; HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.89-2.72). Conclusion This study found that time to diagnosis for head and neck cancers was delayed during a COVID-19 period compared to a pre–COVID-19 period. However, there was no evidence of delays in time to staging and time to treatment during the COVID-19 period. Our results prompt further investigations into the factors contributing to diagnostic delays but provide reassurance that despite COVID-19, patients were receiving timely staging and treatment for head and neck cancers.

scholarly journals Filipino head and neck cancer patients and their quality of life

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 439
Author(s):  
Frederic Ivan L. Ting ◽  
Aylmer Rex B. Hernandez ◽  
Reno Eufemon P. Cereno ◽  
Irisyl B. Orolfo-Real ◽  
Corazon A. Ngelangel
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Head And Neck Cancers ◽  
The Social ◽  
The University

<p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Background: </span></strong>In the management of head and neck cancer (HNC), assessment of quality of life (QoL) is imperative because of the potentially debilitating effect of treatment toxicities. Currently, there are no published data assessing the QoL in Filipino HNC patients, thus this study.</p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Methods: </span></strong>This cross-sectional study utilized the University of the Philippines - Department of Health Quality of Life scale. Patients with head and neck cancers at the University of the Philippines - Philippine General Hospital from February to September 2019 were invited to participate.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Results: </span></strong>A total of 418 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 42 years old (range 18 to 73 years old). In general, Filipino head and neck cancer patients had moderate QoL (mean score of 4.59±0.79). All of the QoL domains (physical, emotional, cognitive, and related functions) had a score of 3-5 (moderate), except for the social status domain which had a mean score of 5.51±0.83 (high). Among socio-demographic factors, patients who are employed and with additional funding sources on top of their income have better global QoL (p&lt;0.01). Clinically, patients with higher stages of disease, fungating tumors, post-laryngectomy, have a feeding tube, with a tracheostomy, and had chemotherapy have lower global QoL (p&lt;0.01).</p><p class="abstract"><strong><span lang="EN-US">Conclusions: </span></strong>Filipino patients with head and neck cancers have an overall moderate quality of life, with high scores in the social domain. Patients with higher tumor burdens and have been exposed to chemotherapy have lower QoL scores, while patients with financial stability and aid have better QoL scores.</p><p class="abstract"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document