Improved Sphincter Preservation in Low Rectal Cancer With High-Dose Preoperative Radiotherapy: The Lyon R96-02 Randomized Trial

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2404-2409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Gerard ◽  
Olivier Chapet ◽  
Chantal Nemoz ◽  
Johannes Hartweig ◽  
Pascale Romestaing ◽  
...  

Purpose The potential advantage of high-dose preoperative radiotherapy to increase tumor response and improve the chance of sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer remains controversial. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the role of escalating the dose of preoperative radiation to increase sphincter-saving procedures. Patients and Methods Patients with rectal carcinoma located in the lower rectum, staged T2 or T3, Nx, or M0 with endorectal sonography, and not involving more than two-thirds circumference, were randomly assigned to one of two groups: preoperative external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT; 39 Gy in 13 fractions over 17 days) versus the same EBRT with boost (85 Gy in three fractions) using endocavitary contact x-ray. Results Between 1996 and 2001, 88 patients were enrolled onto the study. A significant improvement was seen in favor of the contact x-ray boost for complete clinical response (24% v 2%) and for a complete or near-complete sterilization of the operative specimen (57% v 34%). A significant increase in sphincter preservation was observed in the boost group (76% v 44%; P = .004). At a median follow-up of 35 months, there was no difference in morbidity, local relapse, and 2-year overall survival. Conclusion A dose escalation with endocavitary irradiation provides increased tumor response and sphincter preservation with no detrimental effect on treatment toxicity and early clinical outcome.

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica A. Smith ◽  
Aaron T. Wild ◽  
Aatur Singhi ◽  
Siva P. Raman ◽  
Haoming Qiu ◽  
...  

Purpose. To assess for differences in clinical, radiologic, and pathologic outcomes between patients with stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma treated neoadjuvantly with conventional external beam radiotherapy (3D conformal radiotherapy (3DRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)) versus high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy (EBT).Methods. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant EBT received 4 consecutive daily 6.5 Gy fractions without chemotherapy, while those undergoing 3DRT or IMRT received 28 daily 1.8 Gy fractions with concurrent 5-fluorouracil. Data was collected prospectively for 7 EBT patients and retrospectively for 25 historical 3DRT/IMRT controls.Results. Time to surgery was less for EBT compared to 3DRT and IMRT (P<0.001). There was a trend towards higher rate of pathologic CR for EBT (P=0.06). Rates of margin and lymph node positivity at resection were similar for all groups. Acute toxicity was less for EBT compared to 3DRT and IMRT (P=0.025). Overall and progression-free survival were noninferior for EBT. On MRI, EBT achieved similar complete response rate and reduction in tumor volume as 3DRT and IMRT. Histopathologic comparison showed that EBT resulted in more localized treatment effects and fewer serosal adhesions.Conclusions. EBT offers several practical benefits over conventional radiotherapy techniques and appears to be at least as effective against low rectal cancer as measured by short-term outcomes.


Brachytherapy ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
Te Vuong ◽  
Sender Liberman ◽  
Carole Richard ◽  
Sergio Faria ◽  
Kevin Waschke ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document