Quality of Life in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia on Imatinib Versus Interferon Alfa Plus Low-Dose Cytarabine: Results From the IRIS Study

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 2138-2146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Hahn ◽  
G. Alastair Glendenning ◽  
Mark V. Sorensen ◽  
Stacie A. Hudgens ◽  
Brian J. Druker ◽  
...  

Purpose: Quality of life (QOL) outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) were evaluated in an international phase III study. Patients and Methods: Newly diagnosed patients with chronic phase CML were randomly assigned to imatinib or interferon alfa plus subcutaneous low-dose cytarabine (IFN+LDAC). Cross-over to the other treatment was permitted because of intolerance or lack of efficacy. Patients completed cancer-specific QOL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Biologic Response Modifiers) and utility (Euro QoL-5D) questionnaires at baseline and during treatment (n = 1,049). The primary QOL end point was the Trial Outcome Index (TOI; a measure of physical function and well-being). Secondary end points included social and family well-being (SFWB), emotional well-being (EWB), and the utility score. Primary analyses were intention to treat with secondary analyses accounting for cross-over. Results: Patients receiving IFN+LDAC experienced a large decline in the TOI, whereas those receiving imatinib maintained their baseline level. Treatment differences at each visit were significant (P < .001) and clinically relevant in favor of imatinib. Mean SFWB, EWB, and utility scores were also significantly better for those patients taking imatinib. Patients who crossed over to imatinib experienced a large increase in TOI; significant (P < .001) differences were observed between patients who did and did not cross over in favor of imatinib. Conclusion: Imatinib offers clear QOL advantages compared with IFN+LDAC as first-line treatment of chronic phase CML. In addition, patients who cross over to imatinib from IFN+LDAC experience a significant improvement in QOL compared with patients who continue to take IFN+LDAC.

Cancer ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (11) ◽  
pp. 2584-2592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Anstrom ◽  
Shelby D. Reed ◽  
Andrew S. Allen ◽  
G. Alastair Glendenning ◽  
Kevin A. Schulman

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 1241-1249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim H. Brümmendorf ◽  
Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽  
Andrew G. Bushmakin ◽  
Joseph C. Cappelleri ◽  
Andrea Viqueira ◽  
...  

Abstract Patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP CML) can be effectively treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and achieve a lifespan similar to the general population. The success of TKIs, however, requires long-term and sometimes lifelong treatment; thus, patient-assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an increasingly important parameter for treatment selection. Bosutinib is a TKI approved for CP CML in newly diagnosed adults and in those resistant or intolerant to prior therapy. In the Bosutinib Trial in First-Line Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Treatment (BFORE), bosutinib demonstrated a significantly higher major molecular response rate compared with imatinib, with maintenance of HRQoL (measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu) questionnaire), after 12 months of first-line treatment. We examined relationships between molecular response (MR) and HRQoL. MR values were represented by a log-reduction scale (MRLR; a continuous variable). A repeated-measures longitudinal model was used to estimate the relationships between MRLR as a predictor and each FACT-Leu domain as an outcome. Effect sizes were calculated to determine strength of effects and allow comparisons across domains. The majority of FACT-Leu domains (with the exception of social well-being and physical well-being) demonstrated a significant relationship with MRLR (p < 0.05). Our results showed variable impact of clinical improvement on different dimensions of HRQoL. For patients who achieved MR5, emotional well-being and leukemia-specific domains showed the greatest improvement, with medium differences in effect sizes, whereas social well-being and physical well-being had the weakest relationship with MR.


2006 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Deenik ◽  
B. van der Holt ◽  
G. E. G. Verhoef ◽  
A. V. M. B. Schattenberg ◽  
L. F. Verdonck ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidia Borghi ◽  
Gianantonio Rosti ◽  
Alessandro Maggi ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Eros Di Bona ◽  
...  

Achievement of deep molecular response following treatment with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) allows for treatment-free remission (TFR) in many patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Successful TFR is defined as the achievement of a sustained molecular response after cessation of ongoing TKI therapy. The phase 3 ENESTPath study was designed to determine the required optimal duration of consolidation treatment with the second-generation TKI, nilotinib 300 mg twice-daily, to remain in successful TFR without relapse after entering TFR for 12 months. The purpose of this Italian ‘patient’s voice CML’ substudy was to evaluate patients’ psycho-emotional characteristics and quality of life through their experiences of stopping treatment with nilotinib and entering TFR. The purpose of the present contribution is to early present the study protocol of an ongoing study to the scientific community, in order to describe the study rationale and to extensively present the study methodology. Patients aged ≥18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of Philadelphia chromosome positive BCR-ABL1+ CML in chronic phase and treated with front-line imatinib for a minimum of 24 months from the enrollment were eligible. Patients consenting to participate the substudy will have quality of life questionnaires and in-depth qualitative interviews conducted. The substudy will include both qualitative and quantitative design aspects to evaluate the psychological outcomes as assessed via patients’ emotional experience during and after stopping nilotinib therapy. Randomization is hypothesized to be a timepoint of higher psychological alert or distress when compared to consolidation and additionally any improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) due to nilotinib treatment is expected across the timepoints (from consolidation, to randomization, and TFR). An association is also expected between dysfunctional coping strategies, such as detachments and certain personality traits, and psychological distress and HRQoL impairments. Better HRQoL outcomes are expected in TFR compared to the end of consolidation. This substudy is designed for in-depth assessment of all potential psycho-emotional variables and aims to determine the need for personalized patient care and counselling, and also guide clinicians to consider the psychological well-being of patients who are considering treatment termination.NCT number: NCT01743989, EudraCT number: 2012-005124-15


Cancer ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 101 (11) ◽  
pp. 2574-2583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelby D. Reed ◽  
Kevin J. Anstrom ◽  
Jennifer A. Ludmer ◽  
G. Alastair Glendenning ◽  
Kevin A. Schulman

2003 ◽  
Vol 348 (11) ◽  
pp. 994-1004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen G. O'Brien ◽  
François Guilhot ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Insa Gathmann ◽  
Michele Baccarani ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document