Rituximab as First-Line and Maintenance Therapy for Patients With Indolent Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (20) ◽  
pp. 4261-4267 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Hainsworth ◽  
Sharlene Litchy ◽  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
Daniel C. Scullin ◽  
Steven W. Corso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stable Disease ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate response to single-agent rituximab in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) and no previous systemic therapy, and the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of maintenance rituximab, administered at 6-month intervals, in patients with objective response or stable disease after first-line rituximab therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with indolent NHL (follicular or small lymphocytic subtypes) previously untreated with systemic therapy received rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenously weekly for 4 weeks. Patients were restaged at week 6 for response; those with objective response or stable disease received maintenance rituximab courses (identical dose and schedule) at 6-month intervals. Maintenance was continued for a maximum of four rituximab courses or until progression. Between March 1998 and May 1999, 62 patients were entered onto this trial; minimum follow-up was 24 months. RESULTS: Sixty patients (97%) completed the first 4-week course of rituximab and were assessable for response. All have now completed rituximab therapy; 36 (58%) received four courses at 6-month intervals. The objective response rate at 6 weeks was 47%; 45% of patients had stable disease. With continued maintenance, final response rate increased to 73%, with 37% complete responses. Response was similar in patients with follicular versus small lymphocytic subtypes (76% v 70%, respectively). Median actuarial progression-free survival was 34 months. Two patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicity with the first dose; one patient was removed from treatment. No cumulative or additional toxicities were seen with maintenance courses. CONCLUSION: Rituximab is highly active and extremely well tolerated as first-line single-agent therapy for indolent NHL. First-line treatment with scheduled maintenance at 6-month intervals produces high overall and complete response rates and a longer progression-free survival (34 months) than has been reported with a standard 4-week treatment.

scholarly journals 177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Radiosensitizing Capecitabine Versus Octreotide Long-Acting Release as First-Line Systemic Therapy in Advanced Grade 1 or 2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Institution Experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 1167-1175
Author(s):  
Swayamjeet Satapathy ◽  
Bhagwant R. Mittal ◽  
Ashwani Sood ◽  
Apurva Sood ◽  
Rakesh Kapoor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Octreotide Lar ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Long Acting

PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine and octreotide long-acting release (LAR) as first-line systemic therapy in advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data of consecutive patients of advanced inoperable or metastatic grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs treated with first-line 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine or octreotide LAR from September 2012 to December 2019 were collected and analyzed for response, toxicity, and survival outcomes. RESULTS Seventy-six patients (median age: 53 years; range 14-81 years) with treatment-naïve advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs were included. Thirty-six patients received a median cumulative dose of 27.3 GBq of 177Lu-DOTATATE intravenously at 8-12 weeks' intervals along with 1,250 mg/m2 oral capecitabine on days 0-14 of each cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE, whereas 40 patients were administered 30 mg octreotide LAR intramuscularly every 4 weeks. Using response evaluation criteria in solid tumor 1.1, the objective response rate was 38% in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm compared with 15% in the octreotide LAR arm ( P = .025), whereas the disease control rates were 88% and 67% in 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms, respectively ( P = .035). The median durations of progression-free survival in the 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms were 54 months and 16 months, respectively ( P = .017), whereas the median overall survival was not reached and not significantly different across both the arms. Of the treatment-related adverse events, no major difference was observed in the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities between the two treatment arms. CONCLUSION First-line systemic 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine achieved better radiologic response and longer progression-free survival compared with octreotide LAR in patients with advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs. Future randomized controlled trials are, however, required to determine the best treatment sequence for the treatment-naïve patients with advanced GEP-NETs.

scholarly journals The Efficacy of Ramucirumab in the Treatment of Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of RCTs

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Hongqiong Yang ◽  
Yaojun Zhou ◽  
Liangzhi Wang ◽  
Tianyi Gu ◽  
Mengjia Lv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Five electronic databases were searched for eligible records. Outcomes were presented and analyzed according to the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and overall survival (OS) rate. Five records involving 2,024 participants were included in the study. The pooled analysis of OS and PFS were longer with ramucirumab (RAM) therapy than without RAM for OS (odds ratio OR = 0.90 , 95% confidence interval CI = 0.82 – 1.00 , p = 0.05 ) and PFS ( OR = 0.74 , 95 % CI = 0.57 – 0.96 , p = 0.02 ). Moreover, compared with the current first-line chemotherapy, the OS ( OR = 0.93 , 95 % CI = 0.83 – 1.04 , p = 0.19 ) and PFS ( OR = 0.82 , 95 % CI = 0.64 – 1.06 , p = 0.13 ) results were not significantly higher with RAM. The ORRs of the patients in the RAM therapy groups were significantly higher than those in the groups without RAM ( OR = 1.40 , 95 % CI = 1.14 – 1.73 , p = 0.001 ).

Effects of adding necitumumab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 1331-1342
Author(s):  
Irena Ilic ◽  
Sandra Sipetic ◽  
Jovan Grujicic ◽  
Milena Ilic
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

Introduction Almost half of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Our aim was to assess the effects of adding necitumumab to chemotherapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Material and methods A comprehensive literature search was performed according to pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data on overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate and adverse events were extracted. A meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for time-to-event data and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for dichotomous outcomes. Results The meta-analysis included four randomized clinical trials with 2074 patients. The pooled results showed significant improvement for overall survival (HR = 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.95), p = 0.004) when necitumumab was added to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. No statistically significant improvement was noted for progression-free survival and objective response rate (HR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.69–1.01), p = 0.06 and OR = 1.46 (95% CI 0.90–2.38), p = 0.13, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with non-squamous NSCLC, there was no benefit in overall survival and objective response rate. Patients with advanced NSCLC who received necitumumab were at the highest odds of developing a skin rash (OR = 14.50 (95% CI 3.16–66.43), p = 0.0006) and hypomagnesaemia (OR = 2.77 (95% CI 2.23–3.45), p < 0.00001), while the OR for any grade ≥3 adverse event was 1.55 (95% CI 1.28–1.87, p < 0.00001). Conclusions The addition of necitumumab to standard chemotherapy in a first-line setting in patients with stage IV NSCLC results in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival, while the results were not significant for progression-free survival and objective response rate.

Objective response rate and progression-free survival as surrogate endpoints for overall survival and the impact of crossover and unbalanced post-progression treatments: A systematic review and meta-analysis in first-line therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9049-9049
Author(s):  
Boris Pfeiffer ◽  
Mahmoud Hashim ◽  
Monica Duran ◽  
Maarten Postma ◽  
Bart Heeg
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Surrogate Endpoints ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
The Impact

9049 Background: Correlations between overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) or progression-free survival (PFS) are poor. We aimed to evaluate the impact of crossover and unbalanced subsequent treatments on ORR and PFS as surrogate endpoints for OS in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first-line therapy. Methods: A systematic literature review of randomized clinical trials of systemic treatment for patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC receiving first-line therapy was performed. Weighted (by trial size) linear regression models were fitted with the absolute difference in ORR or median PFS as an independent variable and the absolute difference in median OS as a dependent variable. The analysis was repeated in predefined subsets based on crossover and balance of post-progression therapies. Surrogate threshold effect (STE) was estimated using prediction intervals. Results: 317 trials (78,644 patients) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. In all treatment arms, the mean ORR, median PFS, and median OS were 28.2% (standard deviation (SD) = 12.4%), 5.1 months (SD = 2.1), and 10.4 months (SD = 2.5), respectively. ORR and PFS had weak (R = 0.351; 95% CI: 0.251-0.443) and (R = 0.397; 95% CI: 0.267-0.512) associations with OS, respectively. However, within phase III trials that did not allow crossover and reported balanced post-progression treatments, both ORR and PFS had stronger associations with OS (ORR and OS: R = 0.601, 95% CI: 0.399-0.747; PFS and OS: R = 0.695, 95% CI: 0.446-0.844). STE estimation indicated that trials that show statistically significant treatment effect size of ≥43% ORR or ≥3.2 median PFS months can be expected to show significant OS benefit with sufficient certainty. Conclusions: Surrogacy of ORR and PFS for OS might be better estimated in trials that do not allow crossover and report balanced post-progression treatments. Presented STE calculation can be used to estimate the expected effect on OS when either ORR or PFS are used as primary endpoints.

Pharmacoeconomic analysis for K-Ras status–based decisions for first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in Spain.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 438-438
Author(s):  
Cristobal Belda
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Ras Status

438 Background: Personalized medicine is a challenge for current oncology practice. Nowadays there are no pharmacoeconomic analyses in Spain dealing with the clinical and financial impact secondary to K-Ras based decisions for first-line therapy in mCRC patients. So, this study was aimed to assess the cost- effectiveness of K-Ras status based decisions in first- line therapy of mCRC patients in comparison with non- K-Ras based selection of available therapies. Methods: K-Ras mutation prevalence and efficacy of available therapies (measured as response rate and progression free survival) were extracted from randomized clinical trials (RCT) that allowed on-label use of accessible drugs in Spain. Then, we have simulated all possibilities of combination therapies for first-line mCRC based on K-Ras status (wild- type vs mutated) and confronted with all therapies that could be chosen in absence of K-Ras analysis. Prices for all drugs in Spain were used to assume the best- value for each drug including all possibilities to reduce pharmacy costs. For first line, median duration of therapy reported by RCT was used to calculate the final budget. 70 kg and 1.7 m were used as reference for patients dose calculations. Results: First-line therapy that includes a biological drug in absence of K-Ras status based decisions implies an incremental cost per 1% of increased response rate of 1,237 euros for irinotecan based doublets and 3,193 euros for oxaliplatin based doublets. On the opposite, K-Ras based decisions reduce costs per objective response by 69% and 35% for irinotecan and oxaliplatin- based schedules in K-Ras wild-type population incorporating cetuximab as biological agent. These data mimic all calculi based on incremental costs secondary to improved progression free survival measured as HR when all scenarios without prior determination of K-Ras status were confronted with K-Ras based decisions. Conclusions: K-Ras based decisions reduces costs per objective response as well as per improved progression free survival. The most cost- effective scenario among all simulated was cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy for patients that harbor wt K-Ras mCRC.

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic NSCLC that were PD-L1 negative or less than 1%.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9061-9061
Author(s):  
Thierry Landre ◽  
Gaetan Des Guetz ◽  
Kader Chouahnia ◽  
Cherifa Taleb ◽  
Alain Vergnenegre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Study Heterogeneity ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Line Setting

9061 Background: Clinical efficacy of single agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in patients with Non-Small-Cell-Lung-Cancer (NSCLC) that were PD-L1 negative or < 1% is controversial. Recent studies have evaluated the combination of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 to chemotherapy (CT) for this population in the first line setting. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis (MA) of randomized trials that compared PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus CT with CT alone in first line of treatment for advanced NSCLC. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) in patients with undetectable PD-L1 expression or < 1%. A fixed-effect or random-effects model was adopted depending on between-study heterogeneity. Results: Four studies evaluated atezolizumab + CT (IMpower 130,131,132 and 150), three studies pembrolizumab + CT (Keynote 021, 189 and 407) and one study evaluated nivolumab + CT (CheckMate 227). The eight eligible studies included 2037 patients (1246 with PD-L1 negative and 791 with PD-L1 expression < 1%). Most of the patients were men and smokers, with a median age of 64 years. There were 1423 Non-squamous (69.8 %) and 614 Squamous tumors (30%). The combination (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor + CT) was significantly associated with improvement of OS (hazards ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI 0.63–0.89; p < 0.0001), PFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI 0.65–0.80; p < 0.0001) and ORR (relative ratio [RR], 2.59; 95% CI 1.46–4.60; p < 0.0001). Moreover, median duration of response (DOR) was statistically longer with combination (8.1 months versus 4.9; p < 0.0008). Conclusions: For patients with untreated NSCLC with low ( < 1%) or undetectable PD-L1 expression, the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combination with chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, is associated with significantly improved OS, PFS, and ORR.

scholarly journals Use of first-line trabectedin in advanced leiomyosarcoma: a review of clinical data and future perspectives

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-10
Author(s):  
Nadia Hindi ◽  
Florence Duffaud ◽  
Giacomo Giulio Baldi ◽  
Patricia Pautier
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Large Subgroup ◽  
Myxoid Liposarcomas ◽  
Line Setting

Leiomyosarcomas (LMS) represent a large subgroup of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) generally considered moderately sensitive to conventional chemotherapy. Single-agent doxorubicin is the standard first-line therapy for advanced non-selected STS, although combination with ifosfamide appears to be superior in terms of objective response. Gemcitabine-based regimes, dacarbazine, trabectedin and pazopanib seem to be especially active in patients with advanced LMS, while the activity of ifosfamide in this histotype is low. Data derived from clinical trials and retrospective series show that trabectedin is especially active in L-sarcomas including non-gynecological and uterine LMS as well as liposarcomas, in particular myxoid liposarcomas. Trabectedin has also been tested in the first-line setting, alone or in combination with doxorubicin, for the treatment of LMS of uterine and non-uterine origin in a trial by the French Sarcoma Group (phase II study LMS-02) with encouraging results in terms of median progression-free survival and objective response. The toxicity profile of trabectedin appears to be comparable to, or even more manageable than, that of other chemotherapy combinations in the first-line setting. Designing new clinical trials based on specific histologic subtypes is feasible, and the results of such studies would help to optimize the management of patients with STS.

scholarly journals Thalidomide Combined with Interferons for the Treatment of Recurrent or Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5341-5341
Author(s):  
Fangfang Yuan ◽  
Hao Ai ◽  
Qingsong Yin ◽  
Lin Chen ◽  
Ruihua Mi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Interferon Α ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Non Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Abstract This study examined the clinical efficacy and safety of thalidomide combined with interferons for the treatment of recurrent/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. We retrospectively analysed the clinical data of 42 patients with recurrent or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) who were treated with a regimen of thalidomide combined and interferon α-1b (IFNα-1b) at Henan Tumour Hospital from July 2007 to January 2017. Specifically, the patients initially received 100 mg thalidomide in tablet form once daily at bedtime. If the patient tolerated the drug, the dose was increased to 200 mg. Recombinant human interferon α-1b was subcutaneously injected at a dosage of 60 μg every other day over a period of four weeks. The efficacy was monitored throughout each treatment cycle, adverse reactions were evaluated, and the progress of the disease was assessed during follow-up visits. Relevant indicators, such as the overall response rate (ORR), the overall survival (OS), the progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients, and the safety of the regimen, were analysed. Forty-two patients were treated with a regimen of thalidomide combined with interferons for at least 1 period. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated for each patient. The objective response rate (CR + PR) was 73.8%. The median overall survival time was 28 months and the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 21 months. According to the standards of lymphoid malignancies classified by the WHO in 2001, 36 patients were diagnosed with B-cell lymphoma, 24 of whom suffered from recurrent or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The combination of thalidomide and interferons improved the conditions of 16 MCL patients, 8 of whom experienced CR and 8 of whom experienced PR. The median OS was 28 months, and the median PFS was 19 months for the patients with MCL. The primary adverse effects of the regimen were drug-induced fever and joint pain caused by the IFN and neurotoxicity and constipation caused by the thalidomide. The adverse reactions ranged in severity from degree I~II and could be alleviated by symptomatic treatment. Serious adverse reactions, such as anaphylactic shock, deep vein thrombosis and bradycardia, did not occur. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of Chemotherapy in Patients with Undifferentiated Carcinoma of the Pancreas: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Imaoka ◽  
Masafumi Ikeda ◽  
Kosuke Maehara ◽  
Kumiko Umemoto ◽  
Masato Ozaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Undifferentiated Carcinoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Paclitaxel Group

Abstract Background: Undifferentiated carcinoma (UC) of the pancreas is a rare subtype of pancreatic cancer. Although UC has been considered a highly aggressive malignancy, no clinical studies have addressed the efficacy of chemotherapy for unresectable UC. Therefore, we performed multicenter retrospective study to investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with UC of the pancreas.Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at 17 institutions in Japan between January 2007 and December 2017. A total of 50 patients treated with chemotherapy were analyzed.Results: The median overall survival (OS) in UC patients treated with chemotherapy was 4.08 months. The details of chemotherapy in first-line treatment were as follows: gemcitabine (n=24), S-1 (n=12), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (n=6), and other treatment (n=8). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.61 months in the gemcitabine group, 2.96 months in the S-1 group, and 4.60 months in the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel group. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel significantly improved PFS compared with gemcitabine (p=0.014). The objective response rate (ORR) was 4.2% in the gemcitabine group, 0.0% in the S-1 group, and 33.3% in the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel group. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel also showed a significantly higher ORR compared with both gemcitabine and S-1 (gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel vs. gemcitabine: p=0.033; gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel vs. S-1: p=0.034). A paclitaxel-containing first-line regimen significantly improved OS compared with a non-paclitaxel-containing regimen (6.94 months vs. 3.75 months, respectively; p=0.041). After adjustment, use of a paclitaxel-containing regimen in any line was still an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio for OS, 0.221; 95% confidence interval, 0.076 – 0.647; p=0.006) in multiple imputation by chained equation.Conclusions: The results of the present study indicate that paclitaxel-containing regimen would offer relatively longer survival, and it is considered a reasonable option for treating patients with unresectable UC.

scholarly journals BRAF Inhibition in BRAFV600-Mutant Gliomas: Results From the VE-BASKET Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (35) ◽  
pp. 3477-3484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Kaley ◽  
Mehdi Touat ◽  
Vivek Subbiah ◽  
Antoine Hollebecque ◽  
Jordi Rodon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stable Disease ◽  
Pilocytic Astrocytoma ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Diffuse Glioma ◽  
Histologic Subtype ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Best Response

Purpose BRAFV600 mutations are frequently found in several glioma subtypes, including pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) and ganglioglioma and much less commonly in glioblastoma. We sought to determine the activity of vemurafenib, a selective inhibitor of BRAFV600, in patients with gliomas that harbor this mutation. Patients and Methods The VE-BASKET study was an open-label, nonrandomized, multicohort study for BRAFV600-mutant nonmelanoma cancers. Patients with BRAFV600-mutant glioma received vemurafenib 960 mg twice per day continuously until disease progression, withdrawal, or intolerable adverse effects. Key end points included confirmed objective response rate by RECIST version 1.1, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Results Twenty-four patients (median age, 32 years; 18 female and six male patients) with glioma, including malignant diffuse glioma (n = 11; six glioblastoma and five anaplastic astrocytoma), PXA (n = 7), anaplastic ganglioglioma (n = 3), pilocytic astrocytoma (n = 2), and high-grade glioma, not otherwise specified (n = 1), were treated. Confirmed objective response rate was 25% (95% CI, 10% to 47%) and median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 9.6 months). In malignant diffuse glioma, best response included one partial response and five patients with stable disease, two of whom had disease stabilization that lasted more than 1 year. In PXA, best response included one complete response, two partial responses, and three patients with stable disease. Additional partial responses were observed in patients with pilocytic astrocytoma and anaplastic ganglioglioma (one each). The safety profile of vemurafenib was generally consistent with that of previously published studies. Conclusion Vemurafenib demonstrated evidence of durable antitumor activity in some patients with BRAFV600-mutant gliomas, although efficacy seemed to vary qualitatively by histologic subtype. Additional study is needed to determine the optimal use of vemurafenib in patients with primary brain tumors and to identify the mechanisms driving differential responses across histologic subsets.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document