Concurrent Chemotherapy-Radiotherapy Compared With Radiotherapy Alone in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Progression-Free Survival Analysis of a Phase III Randomized Trial

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 2038-2044 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.T.C. Chan ◽  
P.M.L. Teo ◽  
R.K. Ngan ◽  
T.W. Leung ◽  
W.H. Lau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Tumor ◽  
Nodal Size ◽  
Significant Difference

PURPOSE: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is highly sensitive to both radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy. This randomized phase III trial compared concurrent cisplatin-RT (CRT) with RT alone in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with Ho’s N2 or N3 stage or N1 stage with nodal size ≥ 4 cm were randomized to receive cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly up to 8 weeks concurrently with radical RT (CRT) or RT alone. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Three hundred fifty eligible patients were randomized. Baseline patient characteristics were comparable in both arms. There were significantly more toxicities, including mucositis, myelosuppression, and weight loss in the CRT arm. There were no treatment-related deaths in the CRT arm, and one patient died during treatment in the RT-alone arm. At a median follow-up of 2.71 years, the 2-year PFS was 76% in the CRT arm and 69% in the RT-alone arm (P = .10) with a hazards ratio of 1.367 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 2.00). The treatment effect had a significant covariate interaction with tumor stage, and a subgroup analysis demonstrated a highly significant difference in favor of the CRT arm in Ho’s stage T3 (P = .0075) with a hazards ratio of 2.328 (95% CI, 1.26 to 4.28). For T3 stage, the time to first distant failure was statistically significantly different in favor of the CRT arm (P = .016). CONCLUSION: Concurrent CRT is well tolerated in patients with advanced NPC in endemic areas. Although PFS was not significantly different between the concurrent CRT arm and the RT-alone arm in the overall comparison, PFS was significantly prolonged in patients with advanced tumor and node stages.

Phase III Study of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Positive Effect on Overall and Progression-Free Survival

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Ching Lin ◽  
Jian-Sheng Jan ◽  
Chen-Yi Hsu ◽  
Wen-Miin Liang ◽  
Rong-San Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a radiosensitive and chemosensitive tumor. This randomized phase III trial compared concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus radiotherapy (RT) alone in patients with advanced NPC. Patients and Methods: From December 1993 to April 1999, 284 patients with 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III to IV (M0) NPC were randomly allocated into two arms. Similar dosage and fractionation of RT was administered in both arms. The investigational arm received two cycles of concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin 20 mg/m2/d plus fluorouracil 400 mg/m2/d by 96-hour continuous infusion during the weeks 1 and 5 of RT. Survival analysis was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Results: Baseline patient characteristics were comparable in both arms. After a median follow-up of 65 months, 26.2% (37 of 141) and 46.2% (66 of 143) of patients developed tumor relapse in the CCRT and RT-alone groups, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates were 72.3% for the CCRT arm and 54.2% for the RT-only arm (P = .0022). The 5-year progression-free survival rates were 71.6% for the CCRT group compared with 53.0% for the RT-only group (P = .0012). Although significantly more toxicity was noted in the CCRT arm, including leukopenia and emesis, compliance with the combined treatment was good. The second cycle of concurrent chemotherapy was refused by nine patients and was delayed for ≥ 1 week for another nine patients. There were no treatment-related deaths in either arm. Conclusion: We conclude that CCRT is superior to RT alone for patients with advanced NPC in endemic areas.

Phase III Study Comparing Standard Radiotherapy With or Without Weekly Oxaliplatin in Treatment of Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Preliminary Results

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (33) ◽  
pp. 8461-8468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Zhang ◽  
Chong Zhao ◽  
Pei-Jian Peng ◽  
Li-Xia Lu ◽  
Pei-Yu Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Phase Iii Study

Purpose A prospective, randomized, phase III study was performed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of concurrent weekly oxaliplatin with radiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Patients and Methods From January 2001 to January 2003, 115 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC were randomly assigned to either radiotherapy (RT) alone (56 patients) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT; 59 patients). All patient characteristics were well balanced in both arms. CCRT with oxaliplatin 70 mg/m2 weekly was administered for six doses from the first day of RT. Results All patients were eligible for toxicity and response analysis. Compliance with the protocol treatment was excellent, with 97% of patients completing all planned doses of oxaliplatin, and a lack of high-grade toxicity was observed. After a median follow-up time of 24 months, there was a significant difference in overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in favor of the CCRT arm. The 2-year OS rates were 100% for the CCRT arm and 77% for the RT arm (P = .01). The 2-year MFS rates were 92% for the CCRT arm and 80% for the RT arm (P = .02). The 2-year RFS rates were 96% for the CCRT arm and 83% for the RT arm (P = .02). Conclusion CCRT with weekly oxaliplatin is feasible and improves OS, MFS, and RFS rates in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. Therefore, further randomized trials including oxaliplatin are warranted.

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus epirubicin as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: Efficacy and safety results of a randomized, phase III trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1087-1087
Author(s):  
Zhongsheng Tong ◽  
Shufen Li ◽  
Yehui Shi ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

1087 Background: Paclitaxel/carboplatin combinations are highly active in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted a randomized, phase III, non-inferiority trial comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin (TP) with paclitaxel/epirubicin (TE) as first-line therapy for MBC. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints included response rate, overall survival, tolerability, and quality of life (QoL). Methods: From June 2009 to January 2015, 231 patients were randomly assigned, 115 of whom were randomized to TP and 116 to TE. Baseline characteristics were relatively well-balanced in the two treatments. Results: After a median follow-up of 29 months, no significant difference was observed between the two treatments in objective response rate (ORR) (38.3% vs. 39.7%, respectively). Both the progression-free survival (p=0.158) and overall survival (p=0.369) were very similar between the two treatments. Both regimens were well tolerated. The main toxicities were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions, and alopecia. TP showed higher grades 3–4 alopecia and higher nausea (p<0.05). TE showed higher incidence of myelosuppression than TP (p<0.05) (Table). Those patients whose epirubicin cumulative dose was more than 1000 mg/m2 did not suffer worse cardiotoxicity. Conclusions: Our study suggests that TP arm is an effective therapeutic alternative for patients with MBC, especially in those previously exposed to epirubicin in the adjuvant setting. TP has some advantages, such as less cost and less side effects (myelosuppression and fatigue). Clinical trial information: NCT02207361. [Table: see text]

Is RECIST-defined progression free-survival a meaningful endpoint in the era of immunotherapy?

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 488-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukhvinder Johal ◽  
Irene Santi ◽  
Justin Doan ◽  
Saby George
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Apparent Lack ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Treatment Beyond Progression ◽  
Significant Difference

488 Background: Progression-free survival (PFS) is often used as a primary endpoint in oncology clinical trials as a surrogate for overall survival. Traditionally, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) have defined disease progression as a significant increase in the size of tumor lesions and the development of new lesions. However, some patients starting immunotherapy have shown initial increased size of tumor lesions followed by tumor regression, due to the unique mechanism of action of immunotherapies. This initial “pseudo-progression” could be classified inaccurately as disease progression, as evidenced by benefit from the treatment beyond progression approach ( JAMA Oncol 2016). The phase III CheckMate 025 trial of nivolumab versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma allowed treatment beyond progression if there was investigator-assessed clinical benefit and tolerability. The purpose of our study was to test if treatment duration for an immunotherapy was different from RECIST-defined PFS, and as such, could potentially explain the apparent lack of correlation between RECIST progression and overall survival shown in CheckMate 025. Methods: Using 1-year data from CheckMate 025, Kaplan–Meier methodology was used to estimate the median duration of PFS and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD). Stratified log-rank test was used to assess the difference in treatments. Results: For all patients, the median PFS with nivolumab was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.4 months) and median TTD was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.6–7.7 months). For everolimus, the median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7–5.5 months) and median TTD was 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.7–4.6 months). Conclusions: Patients in CheckMate 025 had significantly longer survival with nivolumab than with everolimus, but with similar PFS. Our analysis demonstrated that while PFS was similar to TTD with everolimus, there was a significant difference between the 2 measures for nivolumab, suggesting that RECIST-defined PFS may not be the proper endpoint to define progression for immunotherapies. Further evaluation of the association of TTD and other immune-related progression endpoints with overall survival is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01668784.

scholarly journals Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Versus Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Final Overall Survival Analysis of GEM20110714 Phase III Study

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.21.00396
Author(s):  
Shaodong Hong ◽  
Yaxiong Zhang ◽  
Gengsheng Yu ◽  
Peijian Peng ◽  
Jiewen Peng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
End Point ◽  
Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Iii Study

PURPOSE GEM20110714 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01528618 ), the first randomized, phase III study of systemic chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), reported significant progression-free survival improvement with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FP; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.68; P < .001). Data from the final analysis of overall survival (OS) are presented here. METHODS From February 2012 to October 2015, 362 patients were randomly assigned to receive either GP (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 once daily on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 once daily on day 1; n = 181) or FP (fluorouracil 4 g/m2 in continuous intravenous infusion over 96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 once daily on day 1; n = 181) once every 21 days. The primary end point was progression-free survival, which has been previously reported; OS was a secondary end point. RESULTS After a median follow-up time of 69.5 months with GP and 69.7 months with FP, 148 (81.8%) and 166 (91.7%) deaths occurred in the GP and FP arms, respectively. The estimated hazard ratio for OS was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.90; two-sided P = .004). The median OS was 22.1 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 25.0 months) with GP versus 18.6 months (95% CI, 15.4 to 21.7 months) with FP. The OS probabilities at 1, 3, and 5 years were 79.9% versus 71.8%, 31.0% versus 20.4%, and 19.2% versus 7.8%, respectively. Poststudy therapy was administered in 51.9% and 55.2% of patients in the GP and FP arms, respectively. CONCLUSION Among patients with previously untreated advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, those who receive GP have longer OS than those receive FP. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin should be considered a preferred front-line option for these patients.

Phase III Trial in Metastatic Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma with Fluorouracil, Leucovorin Plus Either Oxaliplatin or Cisplatin: A Study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1435-1442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran ◽  
Joerg Thomas Hartmann ◽  
Stephan Probst ◽  
Harald Schmalenberg ◽  
Stephan Hollerbach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Time To Treatment Failure ◽  
Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Reduced Toxicity ◽  
To Receive

Purpose This study was designed to compare fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with previously untreated advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction were randomly assigned to receive either fluorouracil 2,600 mg/m2 via 24-hour infusion, leucovorin 200 mg/m2, and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 (FLO) every 2 weeks or fluorouracil 2,000 mg/m2 via 24-hour infusion, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 weekly, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 every 2 weeks (FLP). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Two hundred twenty patients (median age, 64 years; metastatic, 94%) were randomly assigned. FLO was associated with significantly less (any grade) anemia (54% v 72%), nausea (53% v 70%), vomiting (31% v 52%), alopecia (22% v 39%), fatigue (19% v 34%), renal toxicity (11% v 34%), thromboembolic events (0.9% v 7.8%), and serious adverse events related to the treatment (9% v 19%). FLP was associated with significantly less peripheral neuropathy (22% v 63%). There was a trend toward improved median PFS with FLO versus FLP (5.8 v 3.9 months, respectively; P = .077) and no significant difference in median overall survival (10.7 v 8.8 months, respectively). However, in patients older than 65 years (n = 94), treatment with FLO resulted in significantly superior response rates (41.3% v 16.7%; P = .012), time to treatment failure (5.4 v 2.3 months; P < .001), and PFS (6.0 v 3.1 month; P = .029) and an improved OS (13.9 v 7.2 months) as compared with FLP, respectively. Conclusion FLO reduced toxicity as compared with FLP. In older adult patients, FLO also seemed to be associated with improved efficacy.

Early and Risk-Adapted Therapy with Fludarabine in High-Risk Binet Stage A CLL Patients Prolongs Progression Free Survival but Not Overall Survival: Results of the CLL1 Protocol of the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2038-2038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela A. Bergmann ◽  
Barbara F. Eichhorst ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
Hartmut Doehner ◽  
Ursula Vehling-Kaiser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Absolute Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Observation Time ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Binet Stage ◽  
Beta 2 Microglobulin

Abstract Background: Most patients (pts) with CLL present at early stages of their disease. This group is not homogenous with regard to its prognosis, and some pts show progression within 12 months after diagnosis. So far it is not clear if these pts benefit from early risk-adapted therapy. The CLL1 protocol, a randomized phase III trial of the GCLLSG, was conducted to assess if the early use of fludarabine prolongs progression free survival (PFS) in high risk (HR) CLL pts. High risk was defined by an elevated thymidine kinase (&gt;7 U/L) or beta-2-microglobulin (&gt;3,5 mg/L) and short lymphocyte doubling time (&lt;12 months) or diffuse bone marrow infiltration. Combining the biological and clinical factors, at least one parameter of each group needed to be positive to qualify for the high risk cohort. Patients: From 09/1997 to 12/2004 877 previously untreated Binet A pts were enrolled. 788 pts could be stratified, 471 pts (68,3%) to the low risk (LR), 218 pts (31,6%) to the HR cohort for disease progression. 99 pts were not eligible due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria. 104 pts (HRF) were randomized to treatment with fludarabine (fludarabine IV 25 mg/m2/d, day 1–5, every 28 days), 114 pts (HRWW) to “watch and wait”. 30 pts were not eligible for PFS and OS. Analyses on PFS and OS on 188 pts are presented here. Response was defined by NCI-WG criteria (Cheson et al., 1996), progression was defined by slightly modified NCI-WG criteria with regard to the early stage. Results: The median observation time was 45.3 months (95% CI, 3.2–96 mo) for HRF and 40.4 months (95% CI, 6.9–92 mo) for HRWW. The median age in the HRF arm was 61 vs. 62 yrs in the HRWW arm. The HRWW arm contained significantly more male pts (p=0.03). All other parameters used for risk stratification and other characteristics like age, performance state, comorbidity, B symptoms, absolute lymphocyte count, hemoglobine, platelets, lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly or hepatomegaly were not significantly different at time of randomization. Response to fludarabine could be evaluated in 70 pts. The overall response rate was 91%, 11 pts had complete remission (16%), 5 pts had nodular partial remission (PR) (7%), 48 pts (69%) had PR, 3 pts (4%) had stable disease and 3 pts (4%) had progressive disease. Main toxicities (grade 3 or grade 4 CTC) were leukocytopenia and infections. Infections were not significantly higher in the treatment arm (p=0.12). Dose reduction was necessary in 20% of pts due to toxicity. 20 deaths were reported in the HRF arm, 12 deaths were reported in the HRWW arm (p=0.47). Discussion: On an intent-to-treat analysis PFS was significantly longer in the HRF arm in comparison to the HRWW arm (24.2 vs. 15.9 mo, p=0.03). Though the median OS was not yet reached, no significant difference between both groups in OS was assessed (p= 0.47). Conclusion: CLL pts of Binet stage A but with risk features have a median time to progression of 15.9 months. Fludarabine prolongs the PFS, but not the OS in this group of patients.

Better survival with fludarabine and timed sequential busulfan regimen in older patients with AML/MDS.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7046-7046
Author(s):  
Uday R. Popat ◽  
Rima Saliba ◽  
Betul Oran ◽  
Sairah Ahmed ◽  
Amin Majid Alousi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Impact On Survival ◽  
Adequate Organ Function

7046 Background: We previously reported 6% 100 day NRM with a MA fludarabine (Flu) and busulfan (Bu) in older patients with a median age of 60 years. MA dose of Bu in this timed sequential (TS) regimen was administered over a longer period of time. To assess its impact on survival, we compared the outcomes of older patients treated with the TS Bu (TS cohort) or the RIC Flu/Bu regimen, which is used as standard (ST) for older patients at our center (ST cohort). Methods: Patients in the TS cohort received IV Bu 80 mg/m2/d on day -13 and -12 and Flu 40 mg/m2/d followed by IV Bu on day -6 to -3, dose adjusted to achieve a total Bu course AUC of 20,000 μmol-min based on PK studies. Patients in the ST cohort received Flu 40 mg/m2day followed by IV Bu daily for 4 days (day -6 to -3) dosed to achieve AUC of 16,000 μmol-min. Patients with AML or MDS were eligible for the study if they had adequate organ function, had matched related or unrelated donor and were treated between Jan 2012 and Sept 2016. Results: 162 patients, 50 with MDS and 112 with AML, were included in this study. Patient characteristics including age, sex, disease status, cytogenetic risk group, donor type, graft source CMV status and comorbidity were well balanced and without any significant difference in the two cohorts. Median age was 66 and 65 years in ST and TS cohorts, respectively. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were significantly better in the TS cohort (see Table). This was due to a reduction in the disease progression without any increase in the non-relapse mortality (NRM). After adjusting for other covariates, the multivariate analysis for PFS confirmed longer PFS with TS Bu regimen (HR: 0.36; P=0.003). The benefit was mainly seen in patients with a comorbidity score ≤ 3. Conclusions: The myeloablative timed sequential Bu regimen improves survival and appears promising in older patients with AML/MDS. Clinical trial information: NCT01572662. [Table: see text]

Pathological complete response rate (pCR) in thirty-three women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with a neoadjuvant carboplatin-based regimen.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12099-e12099
Author(s):  
Avani Chopra ◽  
Mark Wojtowicz ◽  
Jesse Manikowski ◽  
Bhumika Maddineni ◽  
Lester Kirchner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residual Disease ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chemotherapy Dose ◽  
Dose Dense

e12099 Background: The purpose of this retrospective case series was to assess pCR rate, progression-free survival and prognostic factors in TNBC. Methods: We reviewed medical records for 33 consecutive female patients with TNBC (41% node+) treated between July 2015 and April 2018 with neoadjuvant paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV weekly plus concurrent carboplatin (AUC 4) every 3 weeks for a total of 12 weeks followed by dose-dense doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 2 weeks for a total of 4 cycles. Surgical pathology was studied to determine the presence or absence of residual disease at surgery. Age at treatment, tumor stage, subsequent hospitalizations, and genetic testing were recorded. Patients with residual disease were treated with adjuvant capecitabine 1500 mg PO BID, one week on, one week off, for 6 monthly cycles ± radiation; some patients with a complete pathological response also received postoperative radiation. Results: Among 33 patients, 17 patients had pCR (52%, median age 58 yrs), 10 had a partial response and 6 had no response or progression (median age 63.5). After surgery 24 patients received radiation therapy (XRT). There were 6 hospitalizations, 3 that were treatment related, 2 for neutropenic fever and one for renal failure induced by carboplatin; all 3 resulted in chemotherapy dose reductions; all 3 had pCR. 3 progressions/recurrences were recorded: 2 after treatment and 1 progression during treatment. Two deaths occurred, 1 secondary to progressive disease. Median progression free survival time was 8.5 months (range 0.1 to 24.0 mos). Median time since diagnosis is 16.7 months (range 8.1 to 37.6 mos). There was no significant difference in the median age of patients who had a pCR compared with patients with residual disease. Conclusions: We observed pCR in patients with TNBC treated with a pre-operative carboplatin-containing regimen (superior to historical pCR rates in patients receiving taxanes and anthracyclines only). Although there are insufficient data to demonstrate increased overall survival, we show an improvement in prognosis with a carboplatin-containing regimen for TNBC.

Impact of the prior chemotherapy with two different fluoropyrimidines on the efficacy of CapeIRI or FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer: An exploratory analysis of the phase III AXEPT trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 711-711
Author(s):  
Tae Won Kim ◽  
Kei Muro ◽  
Rui-hua Xu ◽  
Young Suk Park ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Exploratory Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy ◽  
Oral Fluoropyrimidine ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
The Impact

711 Background: Modified CapeIRI (irinotecan 200 mg/m2 on day 1, capecitabine 1600 mg/m2 on days 1–14 every 3 weeks) with or without bevacizumab (± BV) has shown non-inferiority of overall survival compared with FOLFIRI ± BV based on the phase III study, AXEPT, as second-line chemotherapy for patients with mCRC. In this exploratory analysis of the AXEPT trial, we evaluated the impact of the prior chemotherapy with two different fluoropyrimidine backbones (fluorouracil and leucovorin vs oral fluoropyrimidine) on the efficacy of CapeIRI and FOLFIRI. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive standard FOLFIRI ± bevacizumab or modified CapeIRI ± bevacizumab after failure to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the AXEPT study. Prior fluoropyrimidine backbones were categorized into oral fluoropyrimidine-based (eg, capecitabine or S-1) regimen (oral 5-FU group) and fluorouracil and leucovorin-based regimen (infusional 5-FU group). Assessed endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival, response rate, and safety. Results: Prior fluoropyrimidine backbone was available for 642 patients among all 650 randomized patients (oral 5-FU group in 291, and infusional 5-FU group in 351). Median overall survival was 17.0 and 16.7 months for FOLFIRI ± BV and CapeIRI ± BV in the prior oral 5-FU group, and 14.9 and 16.7 months for FOLFIRI ± BV and CapeIRI ± BV in the prior infusional 5-FU group. Median progression-free survival was 7.9 and 8.6 months for FOLFIRI ± BV and CapeIRI ± BV in the prior oral 5-FU group, and 6.8 and 8.3 months for FOLFIRI ± BV and CapeIRI ± BV in the prior infusional 5-FU group. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the efficacy of CapeIRI or FOLFIRI regardless of prior fluoropyrimidine backbones. Therefore, CapeIRI ± BV could also be effective for patients after failure of oral fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (eg, CapeOX ± BV). Clinical trial information: NCT01996306. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document