Population Pharmacokinetics of the Novel Anticancer Agent E7070 During Four Phase I Studies: Model Building and Validation

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (19) ◽  
pp. 4065-4073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ch. van Kesteren ◽  
R. A.A. Mathôt ◽  
E. Raymond ◽  
J. P. Armand ◽  
Ch. Dittrich ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: N-(3-Chloro-7-indolyl)-1,4-benzenedisulfonamide (E7070) is a novel sulfonamide anticancer agent currently in phase II clinical development for the treatment of solid tumors. Four phase I studies have been finalized, with E7070 administered at four different treatment schedules to identify the maximum-tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities. Pharmacokinetic analyses of all studies revealed E7070 to have nonlinear pharmacokinetics. A population pharmacokinetic model was designed and validated to describe the pharmacokinetics of E7070 at all four treatment schedules and to identify the possible influences of patient characteristics on the pharmacokinetic parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasma concentration-time data of all patients (n = 143) were fitted to several pharmacokinetic models using NONMEM. Seventeen covariables were investigated for their relation with individual pharmacokinetic parameters. A bootstrap procedure was performed to check the validity of the model. RESULTS: The data were best described using a three-compartment model with nonlinear distribution to a peripheral compartment and two parallel pathways of elimination from the central compartment: a linear and a saturable pathway. Body-surface area (BSA) was significantly correlated to both the volume of distribution of the central compartment and to the maximal elimination capacity. The fits of 500 bootstrap replicates of the data set demonstrated the robustness of the developed population pharmacokinetic model. CONCLUSION: A population pharmacokinetic model has been designed and validated that accurately describes the data of four phase I studies with E7070. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that BSA-guided dosing for E7070 is important.

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2459-2467 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Gallo ◽  
Paul B. Laub ◽  
Eric K. Rowinsky ◽  
Louise B. Grochow ◽  
Sharyn D. Baker

PURPOSE: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of topotecan in a population model that would identify patient variables or covariates that appreciably impacted on its disposition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All data were collected from 82 patients entered in four different phase I trials that were previously reported as separate studies from 1992 to 1996. All patients received topotecan as a 30-minute constant-rate infusion on a daily-times-five schedule and were selected for this study because their daily dose did not exceed 2.0 mg/m2. Among the 82 patients were 30 patients classified as having renal insufficiency and 13 patients with hepatic dysfunction. The population pharmacokinetic model was built in sequential manner, starting with a covariate-free model and progressing to a covariate model with the aid of generalized additive modeling. RESULTS: A linear two-compartment model characterized total topotecan plasma concentrations (n = 899). Four primary pharmacokinetic parameters (total clearance, volume of the central compartment, distributional clearance, and volume of the peripheral compartment) were related to various combinations of covariates. The relationship for total clearance (TVCL [L/h] = 32.0 + [0.356(WT − 71) + 0.308(HT − 168.5) − 8.42(SCR − 1.1)] × [1 + 0.671 sex]) was dependent on the patients’ weight (WT), height (HT), serum creatinine (SCR), and sex and had a moderate ability to predict (r2 = 0.64) each patient’s individual clearance value. The addition of covariates to the population model improved the prediction errors, particularly for clearance. Removal of 10 outlying patients from the analysis improved the ability of the model to predict individual clearance values (r2 = 0.77). CONCLUSION: A population pharmacokinetic model for total topotecan has been developed that incorporates measures of body size and renal function to predict total clearance. The model can be used prospectively to obtain a revised and validated model that can then be used to design individualized dosing regimens.


2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Grete Märtson ◽  
Kim C. M. van der Elst ◽  
Anette Veringa ◽  
Jan G. Zijlstra ◽  
Albertus Beishuizen ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and to determine a dosing regimen for caspofungin in critically ill patients. Nine blood samples were drawn per dosing occasion. Fifteen patients with (suspected) invasive candidiasis had one dosing occasion and five had two dosing occasions, measured on day 3 (±1) of treatment. Pmetrics was used for population pharmacokinetic modeling and probability of target attainment (PTA). A target 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) value of 98 mg·h/liter was used as an efficacy parameter. Secondarily, the AUC/MIC targets of 450, 865, and 1,185 were used to calculate PTAs for Candida glabrata, C. albicans, and C. parapsilosis, respectively. The final 2-compartment model included weight as a covariate on volume of distribution (V). The mean V of the central compartment was 7.71 (standard deviation [SD], 2.70) liters/kg of body weight, the mean elimination constant (Ke) was 0.09 (SD, 0.04) h−1, the rate constant for the caspofungin distribution from the central to the peripheral compartment was 0.44 (SD, 0.39) h−1, and the rate constant for the caspofungin distribution from the peripheral to the central compartment was 0.46 (SD, 0.35) h−1. A loading dose of 2 mg/kg on the first day, followed by 1.25 mg/kg as a maintenance dose, was chosen. With this dose, 98% of the patients were expected to reach the AUC target on the first day and 100% of the patients on the third day. The registered caspofungin dose might not be suitable for critically ill patients who were all overweight (≥120 kg), over 80% of median weight (78 kg), and around 25% of lower weight (≤50 kg). A weight-based dose regimen might be appropriate for achieving adequate exposure of caspofungin in intensive care unit patients.


Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 754
Author(s):  
Seung-Hyun Jeong ◽  
Ji-Hun Jang ◽  
Hea-Young Cho ◽  
Yong-Bok Lee

The aims of this study were: (1) to perform population pharmacokinetic analysis of cefaclor in healthy Korean subjects, and (2) to investigate possible effects of various covariates on pharmacokinetic parameters of cefaclor. Although cefaclor belongs to the cephalosporin family antibiotic that has been used in various indications, there have been very few population studies on factors affecting its pharmacokinetics. Therefore, this study is very important in that effective therapy could be possible through a population pharmacokinetic study that explores effective covariates related to cefaclor pharmacokinetic diversity between individuals. Pharmacokinetic results of 48 subjects with physical and biochemical parameters were used for the population pharmacokinetic analysis of cefaclor. A one-compartment with lag-time and first-order absorption/elimination was constructed as a base model and extended to include covariates that could influence between-subject variability. Creatinine clearance and body weight significantly influenced systemic clearance and distribution volume of cefaclor. Cefaclor’s final population pharmacokinetic model was validated and some of the population’s pharmacokinetic diversity could be explained. Herein, we first describe the establishment of a population pharmacokinetic model of cefaclor for healthy Koreans that might be useful for customizing cefaclor or exploring additional covariates in patients.


CNS Drugs ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 617-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjie L. Hard ◽  
Richard J. Mills ◽  
Brian M. Sadler ◽  
Angela Y. Wehr ◽  
Peter J. Weiden ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gabriel Stillemans ◽  
Leila Belkhir ◽  
Bernard Vandercam ◽  
Anne Vincent ◽  
Vincent Haufroid ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose A variety of diagnostic methods are available to validate the performance of population pharmacokinetic models. Internal validation, which applies these methods to the model building dataset and to additional data generated through Monte Carlo simulations, is often sufficient, but external validation, which requires a new dataset, is considered a more rigorous approach, especially if the model is to be used for predictive purposes. Our first objective was to validate a previously published population pharmacokinetic model of darunavir, an HIV protease inhibitor boosted with ritonavir or cobicistat. Our second objective was to use this model to derive optimal sampling strategies that maximize the amount of information collected with as few pharmacokinetic samples as possible. Methods A validation dataset comprising 164 sparsely sampled individuals using ritonavir-boosted darunavir was used for validation. Standard plots of predictions and residuals, NPDE, visual predictive check, and bootstrapping were applied to both the validation set and the combined learning/validation set in NONMEM to assess model performance. D-optimal designs for darunavir were then calculated in PopED and further evaluated in NONMEM through simulations. Results External validation confirmed model robustness and accuracy in most scenarios but also highlighted several limitations. The best one-, two-, and three-point sampling strategies were determined to be pre-dose (0 h); 0 and 4 h; and 1, 4, and 19 h, respectively. A combination of samples at 0, 1, and 4 h was comparable to the optimal three-point strategy. These could be used to reliably estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, although with fewer samples, precision decreased and the number of outliers increased significantly. Conclusions Optimal sampling strategies derived from this model could be used in clinical practice to enhance therapeutic drug monitoring or to conduct additional pharmacokinetic studies.


2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Lakota ◽  
Cornelia B. Landersdorfer ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
Anne N. Nafziger ◽  
Joseph S. Bertino ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTDespite a number of studies reporting that ertapenem pharmacokinetic parameters differ considerably in obese patients from those in healthy volunteers, functions describing the relationships between this agent's pharmacokinetics and indicators of body size have not been developed. The aim of this analysis was to develop an ertapenem population pharmacokinetic model using data from a previously described study in normal-weight, obese, and morbidly obese healthy volunteers. A single ertapenem 1-g dose administered intravenously was evaluated in 30 subjects within different body mass index (BMI) categories. The population pharmacokinetic model was developed using the first-order conditional estimation method with interaction (FOCE-I) algorithm within NONMEM. The ability of age, sex, renal function, and various body size measures (total body weight, height, body mass index, ideal body weight, fat-free mass, and body surface area [BSA]) to explain a portion of the interindividual variability on select pharmacokinetic parameters was explored using stepwise forward selection (α = 0.01) and backward elimination (α = 0.001). The data were best described using a linear three-compartment model with total body weight as a covariate on clearance (CL = 1.79 · [weight/95.90]0.278) and BSA as a covariate on central volume (Vc = 4.76 · [BSA/2.06]1.86). After accounting for fixed effects, the estimated interindividual variability was very low (<10% for all clearance and volume terms). Goodness-of-fit diagnostics indicated a precise and unbiased fit to the data. Using the developed population pharmacokinetic model and simulation, reliable estimates of ertapenem serum exposures, which can be utilized to evaluate various dosing regimens in subjects with a wide range of body sizes, are expected.


1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
D I Jodrell ◽  
L M Reyno ◽  
R Sridhara ◽  
M A Eisenberger ◽  
K H Tkaczuk ◽  
...  

PURPOSE This study aimed to (1) develop a population pharmacokinetic model for suramin; (2) use Bayesian methods to assess suramin pharmacokinetics in individual patients; (3) use individual patients' pharmacokinetic parameter estimates to individualize suramin dose and schedule and maintain plasma suramin concentrations within predetermined target ranges; and (4) assess the feasibility of outpatient administration of suramin by intermittent, short infusions. METHODS Plasma suramin concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and compartmental pharmacokinetic models were fit using a Bayesian algorithm. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed using an iterative two-stage approach. Estimates of each patient's central-compartment volume were used to calculate suramin dosage. Simulation of that patient's suramin clearance was used to predict the time of his next dose. Using this approach, plasma suramin concentration was maintained at between 200 and 300, 175 and 275, 150 and 250, or 100 and 200 microgram/mL in four sequential patient cohorts. The ability of two- and three-compartment, open, linear models to fit the pharmacokinetic data was compared. Population pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated, using both two- and three-compartment structural models in 69 hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients. RESULTS Target plasma suramin concentrations in individual patients were rapidly achieved. Concentrations were maintained within desired ranges for > or = 85% of treatment duration in all cohorts. A three-compartment, open, linear model described suramin pharmacokinetics better than did a two-compartment, open, linear model. Population pharmacokinetic estimates generated for two- and three-compartment pharmacokinetic models demonstrated modest interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and the long terminal half-life of suramin. CONCLUSION Suramin can be administered by intermittent short infusion. Adaptive-control-with-feedback dosing facilitated precise control of plasma suramin concentrations and allowed a number of different concentration ranges to be studied. This approach is expensive and labor-intensive. Although we have demonstrated the ability to control drug exposure, simpler dosing schedules require critical evaluation. Population pharmacokinetic parameters generated in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer will facilitate rational design of such schedules.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S529-S529
Author(s):  
Scott A Van Wart ◽  
Christopher Stevens ◽  
Zoltan Magyarics ◽  
Steven A Luperchio ◽  
Paul G Ambrose

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document