scholarly journals Rucaparib in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Gene Alteration

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (32) ◽  
pp. 3763-3772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wassim Abida ◽  
Akash Patnaik ◽  
David Campbell ◽  
Jeremy Shapiro ◽  
Alan H. Bryce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Brca2 Gene ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Psa Response

PURPOSE BRCA1 or BRCA2 ( BRCA) alterations are common in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and may confer sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We present results from patients with mCRPC associated with a BRCA alteration treated with rucaparib 600 mg twice daily in the phase II TRITON2 study. METHODS We enrolled patients who progressed after one to two lines of next-generation androgen receptor–directed therapy and one taxane-based chemotherapy for mCRPC. Efficacy and safety populations included patients with a deleterious BRCA alteration who received ≥ 1 dose of rucaparib. Key efficacy end points were objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST/Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 in patients with measurable disease as assessed by blinded, independent radiology review and by investigators) and locally assessed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥ 50% decrease from baseline) rate. RESULTS Efficacy and safety populations included 115 patients with a BRCA alteration with or without measurable disease. Confirmed ORRs per independent radiology review and investigator assessment were 43.5% (95% CI, 31.0% to 56.7%; 27 of 62 patients) and 50.8% (95% CI, 38.1% to 63.4%; 33 of 65 patients), respectively. The confirmed PSA response rate was 54.8% (95% CI, 45.2% to 64.1%; 63 of 115 patients). ORRs were similar for patients with a germline or somatic BRCA alteration and for patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 alteration, while a higher PSA response rate was observed in patients with a BRCA2 alteration. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event was anemia (25.2%; 29 of 115 patients). CONCLUSION Rucaparib has antitumor activity in patients with mCRPC and a deleterious BRCA alteration, but with a manageable safety profile consistent with that reported in other solid tumor types.

CheckMate 9KD Arm B final analysis: Efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus docetaxel for chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Pablo González Mella ◽  
Daniel Castellano ◽  
Jose Nicolas Minatta ◽  
Arash Rezazadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Measurable Disease

12 Background: CheckMate 9KD (NCT03338790) is a phase 2 trial of nivolumab (NIVO; anti-PD-1) in combination with rucaparib, docetaxel (DOCE), or enzalutamide for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). DOCE is a standard-of-care chemotherapy for mCRPC that may potentiate antitumor immune responses, thus supporting its use in combination with NIVO, which has shown limited antitumor activity in mCRPC as monotherapy. We report final analysis results for Arm B (NIVO + DOCE) of CheckMate 9KD. Methods: Arm B enrolled patients with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC with ongoing androgen deprivation therapy and ≤ 2 prior novel antiandrogen therapies (NATs; i.e., abiraterone, enzalutamide, etc.). Patients received NIVO 360 mg + DOCE 75 mg/m2 Q3W + prednisone 5 mg BID for ≤ 10 cycles, followed by NIVO 480 mg Q4W until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity (up to 2 years). Coprimary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA-RR; defined as a ≥ 50% PSA reduction). Secondary endpoints included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Of 84 treated patients with a median age of 71 years (range: 53-88), 27% had visceral disease and 54% had measurable disease. The median number of docetaxel cycles was 8; the median number of nivolumab doses was 11. Median follow up was 15.2 months. The table displays the efficacy outcomes, which appear to show comparable ORR in patients receiving versus not receiving prior NAT. There was 1 (2.2%) complete objective response and 17 (37.8%) partial responses in 45 patients with measurable disease. Any-grade treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 95.2% of patients, most commonly fatigue (39.3%), diarrhea (35.7%), and alopecia (34.5%). Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 47.6% of patients, most commonly neutropenia (16.7%). TRAEs led to discontinuation in 29.8% of patients. The most common immune-related AEs were GI (35.7%) or skin-related (26.2%). There were 3 treatment-related deaths (1 pneumonitis related to NIVO; 2 pneumonias related to DOCE). Conclusions: NIVO + DOCE has encouraging clinical activity in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC, regardless of prior NAT, with a safety profile consistent with those of the individual agents. These outcomes support the ongoing phase 3 CheckMate 7DX trial of NIVO + DOCE vs placebo + DOCE for mCRPC (NCT04100018). Clinical trial information: NCT03338790. [Table: see text]

A study of two ODM-201 formulations with a safety and tolerability extension phase in patients with metastatic chemotherapy-naive castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 115-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Massard ◽  
Teuvo L. J. Tammela ◽  
Egils Vjaters ◽  
Vilnis Lietuvietis ◽  
Petri Bono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Capsule Formulation ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Effect Of Food ◽  
Extension Period ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

115^ Background: This open phase I trial assessed the bioavailability, and the effect of food on the bioavailability of ODM-201 600mg tablets compared to a 600mg capsule formulation. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ODM-201 were studied in the extension period. Methods: The study had two parts: a pharmacokinetic (PK), and a safety and tolerability part. Dosing was 600mg bid with or without food. In the PK part, three single doses of ODM-201 were given over 3 weeks. In the extension part patients could continue treatment until disease progression or until an intolerable adverse event or condition that prevented further dosing of ODM-201. Results: Thirty men with metastatic chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) were enrolled, the median age was 68. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 18.2 ng/mL and testosterone 23.1 ng/dL at baseline. Food interaction was observed when ODM-201 formulations were administered after a high fat content breakfast compared to administration at fast. AUC and Cmaxvalues were about 50% lower after fast. Twenty nine patients have completed the 4-week visit. The PSA response rate (50% or more PSA decline) was 86%, with a median PSA decrease of -66% (-96, 5) at week 4 (N=18/21). Most commonly reported adverse events so far are fatigue, abdominal pain, diarrhea, hematuria, and nausea. Conclusions: ODM-201 600mg bid as tablets has comparable PK to capsules used in the phase II ARADES trial. It is well tolerated and has good PSA response in chemotherapy-naïve patients with CRPC . Clinical trial information: NCT01784757.

A phase II trial in progress: Pamiparib, an investigational PARP inhibitor, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and a circulating tumor cell homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) phenotype or BRCA defects.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS328-TPS328
Author(s):  
Simon Chowdhury ◽  
Joaquin Mateo ◽  
Mitchell Gross ◽  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
Marcia Cruz-Correa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Psa Response

TPS328 Background: Men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have a BRCA1/2 mutation ( BRCA1/2mut) or mutations in other HRD genes have a poor prognosis. The EPIC liquid biopsy test is a novel assay that can identify circulating tumor cells (CTC) with HRD associated phenotypes. Preliminary studies have shown that these men may respond to treatment with a PARP inhibitor. Pamiparib is an investigational PARP1/2 inhibitor that has shown brain penetration and potent PARP–DNA complex trapping in nonclinical studies. In early phase clinical studies (NCT02361723; NCT03333915), pamiparib was generally well tolerated and showed preliminary antitumor activity; 60 mg orally twice daily (BID) was established as the recommended investigational dose. Methods: This open-label, global, phase 2 study (NCT03712930) will evaluate antitumor activity and safety of pamiparib in mCRPC pts with CTC-HRD, assessed by the EPIC CTC-HRD assay, or deleterious germline/somatic BRCA1/2mut status. Patients must have progressed on/after ≥1 androgen receptor-targeted therapy, have received ≥1 taxane-based therapy, and have prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression per PCWG3 criteria. Four cohorts of patients will receive pamiparib 60 mg BID in 28-day cycles. Cohort 1 will include ~50 pts with CTC-HRD+ +/- BRCA1/2mut mCRPC with measurable metastatic disease; Cohort 2 will include ~30 pts with CTC-HRD+ +/- BRCA1/2mut mCRPC with bone-only disease; Cohorts 3 & 4 will include ~20 pts with CTC-HRD-/unknown + BRCA1/2mut mCRPC with measurable metastatic disease (Cohort 3), or bone-only disease (Cohort 4). Disease status will be assessed every 8 wks for 24 wks, then every 12 wks; PSA levels will be tested every 4 wks. Co-primary endpoints are radiographic ORR assessed by IRC (pts with measurable disease) and confirmed PSA response rate per PCWG3 criteria (pts +/- measurable disease). Secondary endpoints include ORR, time to PSA response/progression, duration of PSA response, time to symptomatic skeletal event, radiographic progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT03712930.

Association of co-occurring gene alterations and clinical activity of rucaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutated (BRCA+) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 80-80
Author(s):  
Wassim Abida ◽  
Akash Patnaik ◽  
David Campbell ◽  
Jeremy David Shapiro ◽  
Alan Haruo Bryce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Plasma Samples ◽  
Tp53 Mutations ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Psa Response

80 Background: The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib was granted accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with BRCA+ mCRPC based on results from the phase 2 TRITON2 study (NCT02952534). The TP53 tumor suppressor gene is among the most frequently mutated genes in human cancers, including mCRPC, and alterations in TP53, PTEN, and RB1 are associated with poor prognosis in patients with prostate cancer and other tumor types. We present data on co-occurring alterations in patients with BRCA+ mCRPC treated with rucaparib in TRITON2. Methods: Patients had progressed on 1–2 lines of androgen receptor-directed therapy and 1 taxane-based chemotherapy and were treated with rucaparib 600 mg BID. Tissue and/or cell-free DNA extracted from plasma samples were profiled comprehensively for genomic alterations using Foundation Medicine, Inc., next-generation sequencing assays. Objective response rate (ORR) was assessed per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria by independent radiologic review of patients with measurable disease. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (≥50% decrease from baseline) was assessed in all patients. Results: Tissue and/or plasma samples were available for 114/115 patients with BRCA+ mCRPC (visit cutoff date: Dec. 23, 2019). Among patients with BRCA+ mCRPC who had samples available for comprehensive genomic profiling, 36.8% (42/114) had a co-occurring alteration in TP53. Deleterious alterations in PTEN were observed in 34.2% (39/114) of patients, 44% (17/39) of which were homozygous deletions of PTEN. RB1 loss was observed in 12.3% (14/114) of patients and was seen more frequently in patients with measurable disease (18.0%, 11/61) than in patients with non-measurable disease (5.7%, 3/53). Although patients with and without TP53 mutations had generally similar baseline demographics and disease characteristics, visceral disease was more prevalent in patients with TP53 mutations (54.8%; 23/42) than in those without them (29.2%; 21/72). Similar ORR and PSA response rates were seen in patients with BRCA+ mCRPC with or without TP53 mutation, with a non-significant trend towards lower response rates in patients with co-occurring TP53 alterations. Conclusions: Results from TRITON2 showed antitumor activity for rucaparib in patients with BRCA+ mCRPC associated with or without co-occurring alterations in TP53. Demographics and additional efficacy analyses in genomic subgroups with co-occurring alterations in TP53, PTEN, and RB1 will be reported. Clinical trial information: NCT02952534. [Table: see text]

Docetaxel and curcuminoids (CCM) combination in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): A phase II study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16021-e16021
Author(s):  
Hakim Mahammedi ◽  
Mélanie Pouget ◽  
Eloise Planchat ◽  
Herve Cure ◽  
Xavier Durando ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Psa Response

e16021 Background: Prostate cancer is a major problem in the aging male population. Docetaxel, the first-line reference treatment in CRPC induces a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in 45% of patients and an objective tumor response in 12%. Preclinical studies suggested that curcuminoids inhibit tumor metastasis, invasion and angiogenesis and reverse drug resistance. We wanted to potentiate docetaxel by curcuminoïds in CRPC first line. Our previous phase I study showed the safety and the tolerability of CCM associated to docetaxel for advanced breast cancers. We have conducted in 2009-2010 a phase II study to assess the response of CRPC to this combination. Methods: Patients (n=30) with progressing CRPC and rising PSA were enrolled to receive the experimental treatment. Docetaxel was given in standard conditions (75mg/m², 1h i.v infusion every 3 weeks for 6 cycles + prednisolone) with CCM orally at the dose of 6gr/day (7 days by cycle: d-4 to d+2). The primary endpoint was response rate assessed by biological and paraclinical examinations. The secondary endpoints included safety, time to progression and compliance. Twenty nine patients were evaluable on PSA assessment and 15 on RECIST criteria. Results: 26 patients received the treatment totality and 4 withdrew prematurely. No patient withdrew for toxicity (2 deaths and 2 PSA progressions). A PSA response was observed in 17/29 patients (59%) (4 complete and 13 partial) observed rapidly (before the 3rd cycle) for 15 patients. The median time to subsequent PSA progression (TTP) was 5.8 months. Six patients (40%) had a partial objective response and 9 (60%) a stable disease. The median TTP on targets was 7.85 months (n=13/15). The regimen was well tolerated, with uncommon grade 3/4 toxicity; no adverse event was attributed to CCM. Of 169 cycles, 150 (89%) were completed with perfect compliance. Overall survival was 19 months (mean) and 24 months (median) with 17 events as of december 2012. Conclusions: These results are promising in improving the response rate to docetaxel in terms of both PSA decrease and objective response, with good tolerability and acceptability of CCM. A randomized trial is necessary to confirm this results. Clinical trial information: NCT01012141.

Previous enzalutamide therapy and response to subsequent taxane therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 227-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Gizzi ◽  
Giulia Baciarello ◽  
Aude Flechon ◽  
Philippe Beuzeboc ◽  
Antoine Angelergues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
The Impact

227 Background: Cross-resistance between taxanes and androgen receptor axis targeted agents is a matter of debate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Preclinical data about response to taxanes after prior enzalutamide suggest some level of cross-resistance (van Soest et al, Eur J Cancer 2013) though this was not confirmed in other models (Al Nakouzi N, Eur Urol 2014). The first objective of this study was to assess the impact of previous enzalutamide therapy on the efficacy of subsequent taxane-based chemotherapy. The second objective was to investigate the prognosis of patients when chemotherapy was initiated in enzalutamide-pretreated patients. Methods: Data from 96 enzalutamide- and placebo-treated patients enrolled in the Prevail phase III trial were retrospectively collected from 14 centers in France. Changes in prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels, progression free survival (PFS) and RECIST criteria v 1.1 were used to determine the activity of docetaxel (n=89) or cabazitaxel (n=7) treatment. The Halabi model was used to predict survival probabilities for the enzalutamide- or placebo-pretreated patients when chemotherapy was initiated (Halabi et al, J Clin Oncol 2014). Results: Overall, 96 patients were included in this analysis (58 in the placebo arm vs. 38 in enzalutamide arm). PSA response to taxanes (defined as a decline of ≥50% from baseline) was marginally lower in enzalutamide-vs. placebo-pretreated patients (34% vs. 53%, p=0.10). PSA response in enzalutamide-pretreated patients was not different from that observed with docetaxel given every 3 weeks in TAX 327 trial (Tannock et al, NEJM 2004) (45%, p=0.20, binomial test). Median PFS and objective response rates were similar between the two groups (4.8m vs 6.7 m;p=0.14 and 45% vs 43%;p=0.83 respectively). Halabi score was well-balanced between the two groups (p=0.30). Conclusions: Taxanes retain efficacy in enzalutamide-pretreated mCRPC. At the time of first-line taxane-based chemotherapy initiation, the prognosis of enzalutamide-treated patients according to the Halabi score was not different from that of enzalutamide-naïve patients.

A phase 1/2a trial of docetaxel plus ribavirin for reprogramming efficacy in patients with progressive metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer who have previously received docetaxel alone: DRREEM trial.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 329-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeo Kosaka ◽  
Toshiaki Shinojima ◽  
Kayoko Kikuchi ◽  
Sachiko Hagiwara ◽  
Shin-ichiro Kojima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Investigational Drug ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Blood Concentrations ◽  
Castration Resistant

329 Background: We previously reported a novel cell reprogramming approach, termed drug efficacy reprogramming, as a new model for identifying candidate antitumor drugs targeting the cancer stemness-related gene network, and identified ribavirin as a candidate drug for overcoming docetaxel-resistant castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We conducted this phase 1/2a trial of docetaxel plus ribavirin for reprogramming efficacy in patients with progressive metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer who have previously received docetaxel alone. (DRREEM trial) Methods: In this clinical study, patients received intravenous docetaxel at 60-75 mg/m2is intravenously administered on Cycle1-Day1 in combination with the investigational drug (ribavirin). Docetaxel is administered at 3-week intervals (1 cycle) (total: 3 cycles). During administration, the dose may be reduced based on the subject’s condition if necessary. The primary endpoint was safety. Accessory evaluation items included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, objective response rate, health-related quality of lifel. Exploratory items included changes in CTC count, cfDNA, and exosome. Patients with progressive CRPC based on PSA and/or radiographic criteria, performance status (PS) 0–1, and normal renal and hepatic function were eligible. Results: Six patients were enrolled in this study; average age was 71.7±4.2. Average serum PSA concentration was 100.1±128.0 ng/ml (range: 3.0-336.8). The median cycle of docetaxel received before the study was 6 cycles. Safety: Grade 3/4 adverse events requiring dose modification were not observed. Two patients showed PSA reduction. Three patients showed stable disease. Changes in the blood concentrations of ribavirin, docetaxel, and prednisolone were within normal range. Conclusions: This combination of ribavirin with docetaxel was well tolerated with a promising response rate that justifies further investigations in docetaxel-resistant CRPC. This clinical study provides a useful drug re-positioning model in the area of translational medicine. Clinical trial information: UMIN000021107.

scholarly journals Comparison of effectiveness and safety outcomes of abiraterone versus enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 451-461
Author(s):  
Xin Wang ◽  
Yang Hui ◽  
Shihui Wang ◽  
Xiaopeng Hu ◽  
Xiaojia Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cognitive Impairments ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Psa Response

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness and safety between abiraterone and enzalutamide in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods: We systematically searched for relevant articles from PubMed, Cochrane, Embase from their inception through November 4, 2019. Available articles from conferences were searched. The endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), number of patients with any adverse event (AE). Results: 15 cohort studies involving 3546 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled result showed that PSA response rate in the enzalutamide group was significantly greater than that in the abiraterone group (867 patients, risk ratio (RR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.79, p＜0.00001, I2=29%). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of AEs between two groups (730 patients, RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.14-1.31, p = 0.14, I2=84%). The common adverse events observed in the published articles were fatigue and perceived cognitive impairments. Patients who received enzalutamide had the higher risk to have the feeling of fatigue compared with abiraterone group (2555 patients, RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.85, p=0.01, I2=92%). And there was no statistical difference between two groups respect to the side effect of perceived cognitive impairments (1856 patients, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.47-1.88, p=0.85, I2=15%). Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that enzalutamide was associated with higher PSA response rate compared to abiraterone in patients with mCRPC, and no significant difference was found between two groups in the overall AE. But enzalutamide use induced higher risk of the AE of fatigue.

scholarly journals A Multicentric, Retrospective Efficacy and Safety Study of Nanosomal Docetaxel Lipid Suspension in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Aseem Samar ◽  
Srikant Tiwari ◽  
Sundaram Subramanian ◽  
Nisarg Joshi ◽  
Jaykumar Sejpal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Psa Progression ◽  
Weekly Group

Purpose. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS, DoceAqualip) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Materials and Methods. In this multicenter, retrospective study, we analyzed the medical charts of mCRPC patients, who were treated with NDLS administered as 2-weekly (50 mg/m2) or 3-weekly regimens (75 mg/m2). The study endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (>50% PSA decline from baseline), PSA progression (PSA increase from baseline beyond 12 weeks: ≥25% and ≥2 ng/mL), median PSA decline, and time-to-treatment failure (TTF). Overall survival (OS) and safety were also evaluated. Results. Data of 24 patients with mCRPC were analyzed in this study. NDLS was administered as a 2-weekly regimen in 37.5% (9/24; all first-line) patients and as a 3-weekly regimen in 62.5% patients (15/24; first-line: 20% (3/15), second-line: 80% (12/15)). Overall, PSA response was reported in 66.7% (16/24) patients. The PSA response was 77.8% (7/9 patients) in the 2-weekly group and 60% (9/15 patients) in the 3-weekly group. The median decline in PSA was 96.31% in the 2-weekly group and 83.29% in the 3-weekly group; the median TTF was 6.7 and 6.5 months in the 2 weekly group and 3-weekly group, respectively. The median OS was 14.6 months (follow-up: 5.5–25.8 months) in the 2-weekly group whereas it was not reached in the 3-weekly group (follow-up: 7.9–15.6 months). The most common hematological AEs were anemia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia whereas nausea, weakness, constipation, vomiting, and diarrhea were the most common (≥10%) nonhematological AEs. Overall, NDLS treatment was well tolerated without any new safety concerns. Conclusions. Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (2-weekly or 3-weekly) was effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Combined CTLA-4 and PD-L1 blockade in patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer is associated with increased myeloid and neutrophil immune subsets in the bone microenvironment

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e002919
Author(s):  
Sumit K Subudhi ◽  
Bilal A Siddiqui ◽  
Ana M Aparicio ◽  
Shalini S Yadav ◽  
Sreyashi Basu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Bone Microenvironment ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Measurable Disease

BackgroundImmune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has low response rates in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), in part due to few T cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) promotes intratumoral T cell infiltration but induces upregulation of PD-1 and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) within the prostate TME. Combined anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1 can partly overcome this adaptive resistance and was recently shown to augment responses in patients with mCRPC with measurable disease. Although bone is the most common site of metastasis in prostate cancer, patients with bone-predominant disease are frequently excluded from trials because they lack measurable disease, which limits assessment of disease progression and tissue sampling. We therefore designed this study to investigate combined ICT in mCRPC to bone.HypothesisCombined anti-CTLA-4 (tremelimumab) plus anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) is safe and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone.Patients and methodsIn this single-arm pilot study, men with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone received tremelimumab (75 mg intravenous) plus durvalumab (1500 mg intravenous) every 4 weeks (up to four doses), followed by durvalumab (1500 mg intravenous) maintenance every 4 weeks (up to nine doses). The primary endpoint was incidence of adverse events. Secondary endpoints included serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), progression-free survival (PFS), radiographic PFS (rPFS), and maximal PSA decline.ResultsTwenty-six patients were treated between August 8, 2017 and March 28, 2019. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 11 patients (42%), with no grade 4 or 5 events. TRAEs leading to discontinuation occurred in three patients (12%). PSA decline ≥50% occurred in three patients (12%). Six patients (24%) achieved stable disease for >6 months. At a median follow-up of 43.6 months, median rPFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 1.9 to 5.7), and median overall survival was 28.1 months (95% CI: 14.5 to 37.3). Post-treatment evaluation of the bone microenvironment revealed transcriptional upregulation in myeloid and neutrophil immune subset signatures and increased expression of inhibitory immune checkpoints.ConclusionsTremelimumab plus durvalumab was safe and well tolerated in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC to bone, with potential activity in a small number of patients as measured by rPFS. Combination of CTLA-4 and PD-L1 blockade with therapies targeting the myeloid compartment or other inhibitory immune receptors may be necessary to overcome mechanisms of resistance within prostate bone microenvironment.Trial registration numberNCT03204812.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document