scholarly journals Genotypes and Prevalence of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Among Patients Diagnosed With Head and Neck Cancer at Alexandria Cancer Centre

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 30-30
Author(s):  
Eva M. Ombiro ◽  
Arthur Kwena ◽  
Elias Melly ◽  
Tabitha Kamau ◽  
Geoffrey K. Maiyoh

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to provide original data on the prevalence of head and neck cancer (HNC) and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes among patients diagnosed with HNC in Kenya. Globocan 2018 findings indicate that cervical cancer is the second most frequent cancer in women in East Africa, which suggests a high prevalence of oncogenic HPV among the general population in this region. METHODS This was a retrospective study with laboratory analysis involving histologically confirmed head and neck tissue samples between January 2017 and December 2018. Stored tissues were retrieved and subjected to repeat microscopy, p16 immunohistochemistry, and HPV polymerase chain reaction at the Pathologists Lancet Group of Laboratories. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with Excel. RESULTS HNC accounted for 8.8% of all malignancies at Alexandria Cancer and Palliative Care Hospital. There were more males (64%) than females (36%). Mean age was 50.9 years (± 17.6 years). Most patients came from the western Kenya region. Approximately one third (35.7%) of participants were farmers and students combined. The following were most common subsites identified: nasopharynx (n = 25), larynx (n = 12), and tongue (n = 10); 93.5% were squamous cell carcinoma. Sixteen samples (55.2%) tested p16 positive, of these 2 (12.5%) tested positive with HPV polymerase chain reaction. One of these was from an 87-year-old female who was diagnosed with tongue cancer. Molecular analysis revealed the genotype to be HPV52, and the other was from a 49-year-old male with cancer of the postnasal space who had multiple coinfection with HPV35, -52, and -59 genotypes. CONCLUSION HNC represented 8.8% of the malignancies at Alexandria Cancer and Palliative Care Hospital; 55.2% tested p16 positive and the study managed to detect 3 high-risk HPV genotypes, HPV35, HPV52, and HPV59.

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1050-1056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Jentschke ◽  
Philipp Soergel ◽  
Victoria Lange ◽  
Boštjan Kocjan ◽  
Thilo Doerk ◽  
...  

ObjectivesHuman papillomavirus (HPV) testing is an important part of cervical cancer screening and management of women with atypical screening results. This study was conducted to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the Abbott RealTime High-Risk HPV assay (RealTime) in a referral population, in comparison to the Qiagen Hybrid Capture 2 High-Risk HPV DNA Test (hc2).MethodsRealTime is a new polymerase chain reaction assay that detects 14 high-risk HPV genotypes with simultaneous differentiation between HPV 16 and HPV 18. Five hundred forty-five routine cervical smear samples (ThinPrep) from women who were referred to 2 German colposcopy clinics were included in the study. All samples were tested with both assays for the detection of high-risk HPV DNA. Specimens with repeatedly discordant results were genotyped by Linear Array (Roche) and in-house polymerase chain reaction assays.ResultsBoth assays showed excellent overall agreement (92.8%; κ = 0.86) on 545 samples. Analytical sensitivity of RealTime was comparable to that of hc2 (97.6% vs 95.1%,P= 0.189), whereas RealTime demonstrated significantly higher analytical specificity compared with hc2 (100% vs 93.1%,P< 0.0001). RealTime showed no cross-reactivity with untargeted HPV genotypes in this study. The clinical performance of the assays was evaluated based on histology results available from 319 women (90 nonpathological, 73 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] 1, 75 CIN 2, 74 CIN 3, and 7 invasive cancers). High-risk HPV detection rates observed in women with CIN 1, CIN 2+, and CIN 3+ diagnosis, respectively, were comparable for both assays: 47.9%, 92.3%, and 97.5% (RealTime) and 47.9%, 92.3%, and 93.8% (hc2). Detection of HPV 16/18 with RealTime was highly correlated with severity of dysplasia: less than CIN 2, 30.5%; CIN 2+, 59.0%; CIN 3+, 71.6%.ConclusionsThese results support the use of RealTime for routine detection of HPV infections in a referral population.


1970 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahmina Sultana ◽  
Mohsina Huq ◽  
Anadil Alam ◽  
Dipak Kumar Mitra ◽  
Donald James Gomes

In developing countries, cervical cancer is the most common cause of cancer related to mortality in women. But the epidemiology of human papillomavirus (HPV) in different areas of Bangladesh is largely unknown both in risk groups and in the general population. The objective of the present study was to determine the risk factors associated with having HPV and the prevalence of high-risk HPV types among women with highrisk behaviour and to assess its potential impact on preventive strategies as the sex workers are at increased risk for sexually transmitted infections (STI), HPV and hence cervical cancer. Cervical swab from 293 sex workers in Dhaka City between August and September 2003 and between February 2005 and May 2006 were screened for HPV DNA using an HPV short fragment (E6) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assay. HPV positive samples were genotyped with nested multiplex polymerase chain reaction (NMPCR) for the highrisk types. The overall HPV prevalence in sex workers was 75.8%, whereas for the high risk type it was 49.8%. Prevalence of single genotype and multiple types of HPV was 33.1 and 16.7% respectively. The most prevalent high-risk HPV types, in order of prevalence rate, were HPV16, HPV18, HPV58, HPV45, HPV31 and HPV33. Both HPV 16 and HPV 18 were present in 21% of the cases. Targeting HPV 16 and 18 with prophylactic vaccines could possibly have an important impact on the incidence of invasive cervical carcinoma in this group of women. Primary prevention and cervical cancer screening programmes should be optimized more and run yearly among the general population. It is proposed to screen sex workers when they enter prostitution regardless of their age. Keywords: Human papillomavirus (HPV); High-risk HPV types; Cervical cancer; Sex workersDOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjm.v25i1.4861 Bangladesh J Microbiol, Volume 25, Number 1, June 2008, pp 65-68


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-16
Author(s):  
Gun Oh Chong ◽  
Hyung Soo Han ◽  
Ji Young Park ◽  
Seon Duk Lee ◽  
Yoon Hee Lee ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to detect high risk human papillomavirus in cervical cancer with a pretreatment negative high risk human papillomavirus DNA genotype test and to evaluate clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes according to high risk human papillomavirus status.MethodsWe investigated high risk human papillomavirus status in surgical specimens from 30 cases of cervical cancer using polymerase chain reaction. Polymerase chain reaction primers were set to detect the presence of the common L1 and E7 regions of human papillomavirus types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58. We analyzed the following clinicopathologic parameters to evaluate their relationships with high risk human papillomavirus status: age, histology, stage, tumor size, invasion depth, lymphovascular invasion, and recurrent status.ResultsAmong 30 cases with a pretreatment negative DNA genotype test, high risk human papillomavirus was detected in 12 (40.0%), whereas 18 (60.0%) were negatives. Of 12 high risk human papillomavirus positive cases, 10 (33.3%) were positive for the L1 region, 6 (20.0%) of the 7 types were positive for the E7 region, and 4 (13.1%) were positive for both L1 and E7 regions. According to a multiple logistic regression model, tumor size (odds ratio 7.80; 95% confidence interval 1.476 to 41.216; P=0.0097) and stage (odds ratio 7.00; 95% confidence interval 1.293 to 37.910; P=0.0173) were associated with negative high risk human papillomavirus DNA status. Kaplan–Meier survival plots showed that negative high risk human papillomavirus status was associated with worse disease free survival in contrast with positive high risk human papillomavirus status (P=0.0392).ConclusionsNegative high risk human papillomavirus was found in 60% of cervical cancers with a pretreatment negative DNA genotype test. Moreover, the negative high risk human papillomavirus group was associated with worse survival outcome.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (01) ◽  
pp. 031-036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mrudula Soma ◽  
Suhasini Kamaraj

ABSTRACT Background: Cervical cancer has a major impact on developing countries, where screening programs are not well established or effective. Aim: This study aims to investigate Human papillomavirus (HPV) 6, 11 and 18 expression in cervical biopsies by immunohistochemistry, (IHC) followed by typing of high-risk HPV 16 and 18 in high-grades by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Settings and Design: During the study period of six months, 30 biopsy samples were obtained from patients attending various gynecology clinics in and around Trichy District, Tamil Nadu, between January and June 2009. Materials and Methods: The ecto- and endoscopic biopsy specimens of the cervix were fixed in 10% buffered formalin; routine paraffin sections were taken for processing and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The samples were graded as Normal cervicitis, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) I, II, III, and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), for original diagnosis by pathologists. The extra sections were studied for the expression of HPV 6, 11 and 18 by immunohistochemistry and HPV DNA 16 and18 by PCR. Results: Out of thirty samples, 15 expressed positive and 15 negative for HPV marker. Twenty-seven cases of cervical gradings have been categorized into high grade CIN II/III, SCC (23) and low grade CIN I (4). The high grades were subjected to PCR for high-risk typing. The results revealed that 15 cases were positive for HPV genotype 16 and eight cases for HPV genotype 18. The prevalence of HPV infection was found to be higher in women aged between 50 and 59. Conclusion: This study reveals a significant detection of HPV in the South Indian suspected individuals, by the use of advanced techniques such as IHC and PCR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document