Management of Refractory Germ Cell Cancer

Author(s):  
Anja Lorch

Over the past 5 decades, the use of well-validated, guideline-based strategies has resulted in high cure rates in newly diagnosed patients with germ cell cancer. However, about 30% of those with metastatic disease at initial presentation will experience refractory disease. Salvage treatment is far more complex and less validated than first-line treatment because it is rare, patient cohorts are more heterogeneous, and prognostic factors seem to have greater impact. Prior to the initiation of any salvage treatment, several considerations must be made, including assessment of known prognostic factors and choice of the optimal salvage strategy. Evaluation of patients according to their disease biology, response to prior treatment, and the extent of their tumor burden at the time of salvage treatment is crucial for establishing the optimal salvage strategy. Patients with metastatic germ cell cancer in whom adequate cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy fails should be included in the ongoing randomized TIGER trial comparing conventional-dose chemotherapy with high-dose chemotherapy as first salvage treatment. Outside this trial, patients may be treated with conventional or high-dose chemotherapy depending on the presence or absence of adverse prognostic factors, availability of resources, and patient and physician preferences.

2004 ◽  
Vol 131 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Wierecky ◽  
C. Kollmannsberger ◽  
I. Boehlke ◽  
M. Kuczyk ◽  
J. Schleicher ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 553-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Kollmannsberger ◽  
C. Nichols ◽  
M. Bamberg ◽  
J.T. Hartmann ◽  
N. Schleucher ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5082-5082
Author(s):  
J. Beyer ◽  
M. Hackenthal ◽  
A. Lorch ◽  
A. Neubauer ◽  
A. Dieing ◽  
...  

5082 Background: To determine the activity of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as intensification of second salvage treatment (SST) in patients with multiple relapsed germ-cell tumors (GCT). Methods: Databases in Berlin and Marburg (Germany) on patients treated with HDCT between 1989 and 2008 for germ-cell tumors were screened. Among 534 patients overall, 71/534 (13%) patients were identified as scheduled for HDCT having failed at least one previous conventional-dose first-line and first-salvage chemotherapy regimen. Forty-nine patients who had received at least cisplatin- and etoposide as first-line as well as conventional-dose cisplatin as first-salvage treatment and were diagnosed after January 1, 1990, were further analyzed. Results: Median age at SST was 32 years (range 19 to 52 years). Median follow-up for surviving patients was 4 years (range 1,7 to 8,5 years). Histology was pure seminoma in 5/49 (10%) patients and non-seminoma or mixed histologies in 44/49 (90%). The median number of cisplatin-based treatment cycles prior to SST was 7 (range 5 to 11 cycles). Three of forty-nine (6%) patients either progressed or died prior to scheduled HDCT, the remaining 46/49 (94%) received either single or sequential HDCT. The rate of favorable responses to HDCT as intensification of SST was 27/49 (55%). Ten patients are alive without progression. One additional patient is lost-to-follow at four years without progression. The projected overall survival rate at five years after initiation of SST was 17%. Conclusions: HDCT can induce long term remissions even in patients with multiple relapsed GCT. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


1999 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1467-1474 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Rodenhuis ◽  
R. de Wit ◽  
P.H.M. de Mulder ◽  
H.J. Keizer ◽  
D.T. Sleijfer ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 104 (9b) ◽  
pp. 1398-1403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Kollmannsberger ◽  
Joerg Beyer ◽  
Carsten Bokemeyer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16094-e16094
Author(s):  
H. S. Bozcuk ◽  
M. Ozdogan ◽  
H. S. Coskun ◽  
H. Mutlu ◽  
A. Kargi ◽  
...  

e16094 Background: To analyze the independent associates of outcome in metastatic germ cell cancer (MGCC) patients treated with high dose chemotherapy (HDC) and stem cell rescue. Methods: Thirty-two published patient cohorts with MGCC (encompassing 2176 patients; 510 patients treated upfront and 1666 at relapse) were identified from PUBMED and Cochrane Registry of Clinical Trials. Weighed Regression Analyses of these trials were conducted to define prognosticators. Results: Correlate of overall survival (OAS) and survival with no evidence of disease (NED) in upfront HDC trials was number of chemotherapeutics in HDC (OAS with 2 agents: 60% vs. 3 or more agents: 72%, p = 0.047, survival with NED with 2 agents: 47% vs. 3 or more agents: 64%, p = 0.009). In trials of HDC at relapse, independent associates of OAS with multivariate analysis were line of chemotherapy index, an indicator of line of chemotherapy utilization (p = 0.004), and median age (≤30: 42%, >30: 49%, p = 0.023), whereas independent correlates of better survival with NED were again number of chemotherapeutics in HDC (2 agents: 54% vs. 3 or more agents: 33%, p = 0.001), and seminoma fraction (seminoma fraction ≤9%: 28% vs. seminoma fraction >9%: 49%, p < 0.001 ). Toxic mortality of HDC regimens employed in these trials ranged between 0% and 17%. Conclusions: HDC can cure patients with MGCC both as initial or salvage therapies. However, this study shows that type and setting of HDC, as well as patient age, and seminoma fraction all appear to be linked with benefit from HDC in MGCC. Future trials should continue to address the usage of tandem HDC cycles with multiagent protocols in high risk patients with MGCC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document