Systemic Therapy for Non–Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Author(s):  
Tian Zhang ◽  
Jun Gong ◽  
Manuel Caitano Maia ◽  
Sumanta K. Pal

Treatment options for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) have evolved markedly over the past decade, with multiple targeted therapies approved for the disease. In contrast, little improvement has been made in the management of metastatic non–clear cell RCC (nccRCC). Non–clear cell disease is an umbrella term that encompasses multiple biologically distinct entities, including but not limited to papillary, chromophobe, and sarcomatoid RCC. To date, prospective studies have largely explored treatments for ccRCC (e.g., VEGF- and mTOR-directed therapies) in trials that aggregate non–clear cell histologies. However, the studies do not acknowledge the varying biology of each non–clear cell subtype. Emerging studies in nccRCC should examine individual histologies and apply biologically relevant therapies. An example of this is SWOG 1500, a randomized phase II study that will compare a VEGF-inhibitor to one of three MET-directed therapies in patients with metastatic papillary RCC. Until the biologic diversity of nccRCC is appreciated, outcomes are likely to remain dismal.

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 128-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marit Ahrens ◽  
Sebastian Scheich ◽  
Arndt Hartmann ◽  
Lothar Bergmann ◽  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (29) ◽  
pp. 2307-2328
Author(s):  
Peter J Goebell ◽  
Philipp Ivanyi ◽  
Jens Bedke ◽  
Lothar Bergmann ◽  
Dominik Berthold ◽  
...  

The therapy of advanced (clear-cell) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has recently experienced tremendous changes. Several new treatments have been developed, with PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibition being the backbone of therapy. Diverse immunotherapy combinations change current first-line standards. These changes also require new approaches in subsequent lines of therapy. In an expert panel, we discussed the new treatment options and how they change clinical practice. While first-line immunotherapies introduce a new level of response rates, data on second-line therapies remains poor. This scenario poses a challenge for clinicians as guideline recommendations are based on historical patient cohorts and agents may lack the appropriate label for their in guidelines recommended use. Here, we summarize relevant clinical data and consider appropriate treatment strategies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Anders Olsen ◽  
Dylan J. Martini ◽  
Sean T. Evans ◽  
Jamie M. Goldman ◽  
Mehmet Asim Bilen

Abstract Background Combination regimens that include immune checkpoint (ICI) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition have opened the door to new treatment opportunities for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). While these treatment options have provided improved tolerability and better outcomes compared to older regimens, many patients still experience a myriad of treatment-related adverse events. Given that these regimens were recently approved for mRCC, the complete side effect profile may not be fully elucidated yet. Case presentation We report a case of a 73-year old White male with mRCC who was managed with an ICI-VEGF inhibitor combination regimen. He experienced a partial response (Fig. 1) but had side effects including symptomatic cyanosis diagnosed as methemoglobinemia which led to treatment discontinuation. Upon holding his therapy, his methemoglobinemia and cyanosis resolved. Conclusions Combination VEGF-ICI therapy provide novel regimens for advanced solid tumor malignancies including mRCC. While shown to have improved efficacy in clinical trials, it is crucial that oncologists uncover the full side effect profile of these novel agents especially as their use becomes more standard in the management of advanced malignancies. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a patient experiencing symptomatic methemoglobinemia as an adverse event associated with a VEGF-ICI combination regimen. While the cause of this side effect is unclear, in this paper we attempt to elucidate a process that is in line with the mechanism of action of these therapies to explain how these agents, specifically the axitinib, could have caused the methemoglobin to rise to a symptomatic level.


Author(s):  
Daniel Benamran ◽  
Laurence Albiges ◽  
Axel Bex ◽  
Gianluca Giannarini ◽  
Umberto Capitanio ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 687-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nizar M. Tannir ◽  
Pavlos Msaouel ◽  
Jeremy A. Ross ◽  
Catherine E. Devine ◽  
Anuradha Chandramohan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document