scholarly journals Evolving Treatment Paradigm in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

2017 ◽  
pp. 319-329
Author(s):  
David M. Gill ◽  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Ulka Vaishampayan
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Paradigm

The treatment paradigm for advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has evolved rapidly since the arrival of targeted therapies and novel immunotherapies. mRCC was previously treated only with cytokines. However, discoveries of mutations affecting the von Hippel–Lindau tumor suppressor gene (leading to increased expression of VEGF and hypoxia inducible factor/HIF-1) and of deregulations in the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/AKT/mTOR pathway (resulting in tumor angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and tumor growth) have led to the development of numerous targeted therapies. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has thus approved a total of nine targeted therapies since 2005, including VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, sorafenib, and lenvatinib), a monoclonal antibody targeting VEGF (bevacizumab), mTOR inhibitors (temsirolimus and everolimus), and a multityrosine kinase inhibitor (cabozantinib). Furthermore, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors has again shifted the mRCC therapeutic landscape with the FDA’s approval of nivolumab. Herein, we discuss the unprecedented changes in the field of clear cell histology mRCC in both the first-line and salvage settings, and we also discuss future therapies and recommend a treatment paradigm on sequencing of these agents.

scholarly journals Brain Complete Response to Cabozantinib prior to Radiation Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
An Uche ◽  
Chad Sila ◽  
Tad Tanoura ◽  
James Yeh ◽  
Neil Bhowmick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Treatment Paradigm ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Cabozantinib represents an established vascular endothelial growth factor- (VEGF-) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in the treatment paradigm of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Its activity in mRCC patients with brain metastases (BMs) has been largely underreported in prospective clinical trials. We present the unique case of a heavily pretreated mRCC patient with BMs who achieved a brain complete response to cabozantinib prior to receiving radiation therapy. We end with a literature review and discussion of the biologic rationale and growing evidence supporting the intracranial activity of cabozantinib.

Risk of toxicity with immunotherapy–tyrosine kinase inhibitors for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Rizzo ◽  
Veronica Mollica ◽  
Matteo Santoni ◽  
Matteo Rosellini ◽  
Andrea Marchetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Relative Risks

Aim: Few data are available regarding the safety profile of immunotherapy–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO-TKI) combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The authors investigated all-grade and grade 3–4 (G3–4) adverse events in trials comparing IO-TKI combinations with sunitinib monotherapy. Methods: The relative risks of several all-grade and G3–4 adverse events were analyzed. Results: Relative risks were similar between patients receiving IO-TKI combinations versus sunitinib monotherapy. However, the use of IO-TKI combinations was associated with a higher risk of all-grade and G3–4 diarrhea, all-grade hypothyroidism, G3–4 decreased appetite, all-grade and G3–4 aspartate transaminase increase and all-grade and G3–4 alanine transaminase increase. Conclusion: The results of the authors' meta-analysis suggest that risks of treatment-related adverse events should be carefully considered when choosing IO-TKI combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

scholarly journals Stereotactic body radiation therapy in combination with systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a prospective multicentre study

ESMO Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. e000535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Dengina ◽  
Timur Mitin ◽  
Sergey Gamayunov ◽  
Sufia Safina ◽  
Yuliya Kreinina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Target Lesion

BackgroundTyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and checkpoint inhibitors have been established as effective treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but only a minority of patients achieve complete response. Additional strategies are necessary to improve these agents’ efficacy.MethodsPatients with stable disease for at least 4 months on TKI or checkpoint inhibitors were included. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was delivered to an organ with comparable lesions, where one lesion was in the treatment target and the other one was intentionally left untreated (control lesion). Response in both lesions was scored using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1 criteria 2 months after completion of SBRT. The primary endpoint was the rate of SBRT adverse events, and the secondary endpoints included the rate of reduction in target lesion size.Results17 patients were enrolled (14 men and 3 women, median age: 54.5 years old). SBRT was delivered to the lungs (n=5), bones (n=4), lymph nodes (n=4), liver (n=1), primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (n=1) and locally recurrent RCC (n=2). The equivalent dose in 2 Gy with an alpha to beta ratio of 2.6 was 114 Gy. With a median follow-up of 8 months, the cumulative rate of SBRT-related toxicity (grade 1) was 12% (n=2), consisting of oesophagitis and skin erythema. No grade 2 or higher toxicity was detected. Radiographic response in the target lesion was seen in 13 patients (76%), with complete response in 5 (29%) patients and partial response in 8 (47%), including abscopal effect in 1 patient. Control lesions remained stable in 16 patients. The difference between response in the target and control lesions as judged by the mean sizes of these lesions before and at 2 months after SBRT was statistically significant (p<0.01). Fraction size of 10 Gy or greater was associated with complete response (p<0.01).ConclusionExtracranial SBRT in patients with mRCC treated with TKI or checkpoint inhibitors is well tolerated and could be effective.Trial registration numberNCT02864615

Interstitial lung diseases during treatment with sunitinib or mTOR inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 420-420
Author(s):  
Philipp Ivanyi ◽  
Thomas Fuehner ◽  
Meike Adam ◽  
Christian Eichelberg ◽  
Edwin Herrmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Pulmonary Function Tests ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Steroid Pulse

420 Background: Targeted therapies are the mainstay for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatment. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) represents an adverse event (AE) of such therapies while its incidence and management is poorly defined. Here, the experience on ILD with targeted agents in mRCC is reported. Methods: Retrospective analysis of mRCC patients receiving sunitinib, everolimus, or temsirolimus at three German tertiary centers between January 2006 and August 2009 was performed, accessing ILD incidence, management, and outcomes. Results: In total 26 ILD patients were identified out of 306 mRCC patients (8.5%) treated with targeted therapies. Median treatment duration to ILD diagnosis was 3.8 (range 0.98-21.5) months. ILD occurred in 6 of 204 sunitinib treated patients (2.9%), and in 20 of 102 mTOR inhibitor (mTORi) treated patients (19.6%). Cough represents the predominant symptom (69.2%, n=18). Chest CTs revealed 4 patterns: interstitial (n=13), nodular (n=3), ground glass opacities (n=8), or complex patterns (n=2). Pulmonary function tests (PFT) illustrates frequently a restrictive disorder (n=9), often accompanied by a diminished diffusion capacity (n=8). In 53.8% (n=14) a bronchoscopy with broncho-alveolar-lavage (BAL) was performed (lymphocytic cellularity n=6, eosinophilic cellularity n=4). Dose reduction (42.3%, n=11), temporary interruption (46.2%, n=12), or treatment withdrawal (53.8%, n=14) occurred frequently. Nine patients (34.6%) received steroids. Continuation of targeted therapies was maintained in 65.4% (n=17). No patient died from ILD. Conclusions: ILD represents a frequent AE with targeted therapies and also occurs in sunitinib treated patients. For diagnosis of ILD chest CTs are mandatory, whereas PFT and BALs are important subsidiary tools. Clinical relevance of ILD may vary and management of ILD ranges from watch and wait to termination of treatment and steroid pulse therapy. Severe complaints were more frequently associated with eosinophilic BAL, often required an aggressive treatment. However, in most patients, temporary interruption and/or dose reduction with subsequent continuation of targeted therapy remain sufficient to manage ILD.

Real-world chart review study of adverse events management in patients taking tyrosine kinase inhibitors to treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 574-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandy Srinivas ◽  
Dara Stein ◽  
Dana Y Teltsch ◽  
Sunning Tao ◽  
Laura Cisar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Special Interest ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor

Purpose The purpose is to describe management of adverse events of special interest across tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients initiating tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy between 15 November 2010 and 15 November 2013, and experiencing ≥ 1 adverse events of special interest (diarrhea, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, or stomatitis/mucositis) within 3 months of initiation. Demographics, medical history, treatment regimens, and adverse events of special interest management data for 3.5 months postonset were collected. Results In 220 charts from 27 centers, tyrosine kinase inhibitors prescribed included sunitinib (55%), pazopanib (27%), axitinib (9%), and sorafenib (8%). During the study period, patients experienced 376 adverse events of special interest (13% serious). Fatigue was most common (62% of patients), followed by hypertension (37%), diarrhea (30%), stomatitis/mucositis (29%), and hand-foot syndrome (12%). Over half (56%) the adverse events of special interest were resolved or resolving. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events of special interest occurred in 15% of patients. Prophylaxis was rarely provided (8%), whereas 59% of patients received adverse events of special interest treatment (pharmacologic (55%) and/or nonpharmacologic (7%)), 27% received tyrosine kinase inhibitor dose management, 23% received both adverse events of special interest treatment and dose management, and 31% received neither. Hypertension was the most treated (72% of all events), and fatigue was the least treated (9%); only 4% of patients received pharmacologic treatment for fatigue. Conclusions Most adverse events of special interest were nonserious and more than half of the patients received pharmacologic and/or nonpharmacologic treatment. Fatigue was the most common yet least frequently treated adverse event of special interest, and few patients received prophylaxis or nonpharmacologic treatment. More emphasis on treatment and prophylaxis options for bothersome adverse events is warranted.

scholarly journals Renal toxicity of targeted therapies for renal cell carcinoma in patients with normal and impaired kidney function

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Łukasz Mielczarek ◽  
Anna Brodziak ◽  
Paweł Sobczuk ◽  
Maciej Kawecki ◽  
Agnieszka Cudnoch-Jędrzejewska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Kidney Function ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Renal Toxicity ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Approved Drugs

AbstractThe introduction of novel targeted therapies during the last 2 decades has led to a significant improvement in patients' clinical outcomes with renal cell carcinoma. However, this improvement came at the price of a whole new spectrum of adverse events, including renal toxicity. Systemic treatment of patients with kidney neoplasms who often present with impairment of kidney function, even prior to treatment, poses an increasing diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for clinicians. Common lifestyle-related comorbidities, i.e., hypertension and diabetes, may contribute to further impairment of kidney function. The lack of official guidelines and the exclusion of patients with reduced kidney function from the clinical trials of recently approved drugs complicate the issue even further. Early detection and correct management of renal toxic effects are crucial to preserve kidney function and ensure the optimal administration of life-prolonging therapies. This review presents detailed information on the renal toxicities of three groups of drugs commonly used in renal cell carcinoma treatment: tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. We outline the incidence and underlying mechanisms of renal adverse effects with a focus on patients on renal replacement therapy, as well as present suggestions for their management.

scholarly journals Combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in the treatment of disseminated renal cell carcinoma. Realities and prospects

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 38-52
Author(s):  
B. Ya. Alekseev ◽  
I. M. Shevchuk
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
First Line ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Line Of Therapy

The use of immunotherapeutic drugs as monotherapy and in various combinations for metastatic renal cell carcinoma has revolutionized the treatment of this disease. Thanks to the breakthrough studies carried out, the standard in the first line of therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma is now a combination of checkpoint inhibitors, as well as an immuno-oncological agent with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor.This article presents updated data from the CheckMate 214 study with a minimum follow-up of 42 months. A review of studies on the efficacy of nivolumab in patients with renal cell carcinoma in the first line of therapy with the possibility of adding ipilimumab in case of progression of the disease on the background of monotherapy is carried out, as well as data on the use of a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in the second line of treatment.Monotherapy with nivolumab has a certain effectiveness in a specific category of patients, for example, with potential intolerance to ipilim-umab or first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors, as well as in patients with a favorable prognosis.The combination of drugs nivolumab + ipilimumab is a highly effective treatment option in the first line of therapy with the potential for a sustained response in patients with RCC with an poor and intermediate risk, and in the second and subsequent lines requires further study.

Determinants of treatment for first-line immune-based combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a critical overview of recent evidence

Immunotherapy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Rizzo ◽  
Matteo Rosellini ◽  
Andrea Marchetti ◽  
Veronica Mollica ◽  
Francesco Massari
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Critical Overview ◽  
First Line Treatment

The last three decades have witnessed a revolution in the therapeutic scenario of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), due to the advent of novel agents including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors and the combination of both treatments. These strategies have reported unprecedented response rates, thus improving the clinical outcomes of mRCC patients, and current international guidelines support the use of immune-based combinations as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic disease. However, more data are awaited to help clinicians in the decision-making process. Herein, we provide an overview of recently published results regarding immune-based combinations as first-line treatment in mRCC patients, critically discussing available data that could help in suggesting determinants of treatment in this setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document