scholarly journals Impact of Basic Computerized Prescribing on Outpatient Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (90061) ◽  
pp. 48S-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. K. Gandhi
Keyword(s):  
Medication Errors ◽  
Adverse Drug Events

scholarly journals Reducing the Risk of Harm from Medication Errors in Children

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. HSI.S10454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel R. Neuspiel ◽  
Melissa M. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Medication Errors ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Chronic Illnesses ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Pediatric Age Group ◽  
Improvement Interventions ◽  
Communication Ability ◽  
Quality Improvement Interventions

Medication errors affect the pediatric age group in all settings: outpatient, inpatient, emergency department, and at home. Children may be at special risk due to size and physiologic variability, limited communication ability, and treatment by nonpediatric health care providers. Those with chronic illnesses and on multiple medications may be at higher risk of experiencing adverse drug events. Some strategies that have been employed to reduce harm from pediatric medication errors include e-prescribing and computerized provider order entry with decision support, medication reconciliation, barcode systems, clinical pharmacists in medical settings, medical staff training, package changes to reduce look-alike/sound-alike confusion, standardization of labeling and measurement devices for home administration, and quality improvement interventions to promote nonpunitive reporting of medication errors coupled with changes in systems and cultures. Future research is needed to measure the effectiveness of these preventive strategies.

Improving Medication Safety Through the Use of Metrics

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-64
Author(s):  
Robert D. Beckett ◽  
Marina Yazdi ◽  
Laura J. Hanson ◽  
Ross W. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Medication Errors ◽  
Medication Safety ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Safety Information ◽  
Medication Use ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Survey Instrument ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Safety Metrics

Purpose: Describe medication safety metrics used at University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) institutions and recommend a meaningful way to report and communicate medication safety information across an organization. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an electronically distributed, open-ended survey instrument. Results: Twenty percent of the UHC institutions responded to our survey. Seventy-seven percent of those institutions responding to our survey reported their organization has defined metrics to measure medication safety; an additional 21% of the institutions were still in the process of defining metrics. Of metrics that were reported, 33% were true medication safety metrics. Results are distributed to a wide variety of institutional venues. Conclusion: Institutions should take several actions related to medication safety including defining local metrics; building metrics addressing preventable adverse drug events, medication errors, and technology; and reporting results to a variety of venues in order to design specific interventions to improve local medication use.

scholarly journals Medication Safety: Reducing Anesthesia Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events in Dentistry Part 2

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-59
Author(s):  
Daniel S. Sarasin ◽  
Jason W. Brady ◽  
Roy L. Stevens
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Medication Safety ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Full Spectrum ◽  
Dental Profession ◽  
Novel Method ◽  
Dental Providers ◽  
Preventive Methods

For decades, the dental profession has provided the full spectrum of anesthesia services ranging from local anesthesia to general anesthesia in the office-based ambulatory environment to alleviate pain and anxiety. However, despite a reported record of safety, complications occasionally occur. Two common contributing factors to general anesthesia and sedation complications are medication errors and adverse drug events. The prevention and early detection of these complications should be of paramount importance to all dental providers who administer or otherwise use anesthesia services. Unfortunately, there is a lack of literature currently available regarding medication errors and adverse drug events involving anesthesia for dentistry. As a result, the profession is forced to look to the medical literature regarding these issues not only to assess the likely severity of the problem but also to develop preventive methods specific for general anesthesia and sedation as practiced within dentistry. Part 1 of this 2-part article illuminated the problems of medication errors and adverse drug events, primarily as documented within medicine. Part 2 will focus on how these complications affect dentistry, discuss several of the methods that medical anesthesia has implemented to manage such problems that may have utility in dentistry, and introduce a novel method for addressing these issues within dentistry known as the Dental Anesthesia Medication Safety Paradigm (DAMSP).

Medication errors and adverse drug events in an intensive care unit: Direct observation approach for detection

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 415-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Kopp ◽  
Brian L. Erstad ◽  
Michelle E. Allen ◽  
Andreas A. Theodorou ◽  
Gail Priestley
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Direct Observation ◽  
Adverse Drug Events

Differences in adverse drug events and medication errors among pediatric inpatients aged <3 and ≥3 years: The JADE study

2021 ◽  
pp. 251604352110467
Author(s):  
Jiro Takeuchi ◽  
Mio Sakuma ◽  
Yoshinori Ohta ◽  
Hiroyuki Ida ◽  
Takeshi Morimoto
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Medication Use ◽  
Skill Levels ◽  
Linguistic Skills ◽  
Events Study

Background Adverse drug events (ADEs) are defined as any injuries due to medication use. We hypothesized that the incidences of ADEs and medication errors (MEs) could be associated with linguistic skills of pediatric patients. Methods We analyzed data from the Japan Adverse Drug Events study on pediatric inpatients. This study included inpatients aged one months and older and less than seven years old. We compared the primary outcome of ADEs and MEs between patients aged under three years and three years and older as children typically do not acquire sufficient linguistic skills until around three years of age. Results This study included 639 patients; 412 (64%) patients aged under three years and 227 (36%) patients aged three years and older. We identified 241 ADEs in 639 patients; 152 ADEs among patients aged under three years (37 ADEs per 100 patients) and 89 ADEs among those aged three years and older (39 ADEs per 100 patients). ADEs among patients aged under three years were less likely to be found (49 ADEs) during their hospital stay than those aged three years and older (20 ADEs) ( P = 0.02). Among 172 MEs identified in 639 patients, 25 MEs (15%) resulted in ADEs; 23 (92%) occurred to those aged under three years and two (8%) occurred to those aged three years and older ( P = 0.0008). Conclusion ADEs were less likely to be found and MEs resulted in ADEs more frequently in patients under three years old, and these differences could be explained by differences in their linguistic skill levels.

Perioperative Medication Errors and Adverse Drug Events

2018 ◽  
pp. 138-142
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Anesthesia Care ◽  
Perioperative Medication

This case focuses on medication errors and adverse drug events occurring during the perioperative period by asking the question: What are the rates, types, severity, and preventability of medication errors (MEs) and adverse drug events (ADEs) in the perioperative setting during anesthesia care? This prospective observational study reported that approximately 1 in 20 perioperative medication administrations, and every second operation, resulted in an ME and/or an ADE. These rates are markedly higher than those reported by prior retrospective surveys. Process- and technology-based solutions may address the root causes of MEs to reduce their incidence.

Improving Patient Safety with Information Technology

2010 ◽  
pp. 144-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
James G. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Information Technology ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Simulation Models ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
Computer Simulation Models

Over three-quarters of a million people are injured or die in hospitals annually from adverse drug events. The majority of medication errors result from poorly designed health care systems rather than from negligence on the part of health care providers. Health care systems, in general, rely on voluntary reporting which seriously underestimates the number of medication errors and adverse drug events (ADEs) by as much as 90%. This chapter reviews the literature on (1) the incidence and costs of medication errors and ADEs; (2) detecting and reporting medication errors and related ADEs; (3) and the use of information technology to reduce the number of medication errors and ADEs in health care settings. Results from an analysis of data on medication errors from a regional data sharing consortium and from computer simulation models designed to analyze the effectiveness of information technology (IT) in preventing medication errors are summarized.

scholarly journals P54 Mapping the prevalence and nature of drug related problems among hospitalised children in the United Kingdom: a systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (9) ◽  
pp. e35.1-e35
Author(s):  
Adam Sutherland ◽  
Denham Phipps ◽  
Steve Tomlin ◽  
Darren Ashcroft
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Medication Errors ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Medical Officer ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
List Type ◽  
Drug Related Problems ◽  
Prescribing Errors ◽  
The Uk

AimsProblems with medication account for 10–20% of all adverse healthcare events in the NHS, costing between £200–400 million per year.1 Children are more likely to experience medication related harm.2 International reviews of the prevalence of drug-related problems are over ten years old.3 There is a need for a focussed and critical review of the prevalence and nature of drug-related problems in hospitalised children in the UK to support the development and targeting of interventions to improve medication safety.4MethodsNine electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, IPA, Scopus, HMIC, BNI, The Cochrane library and clinical trial databases) were searched from January 1999 to September 2018. Studies were included if they were based in the UK, reported on the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), adverse drug events (ADEs) or medication errors (MEs) affecting hospitalised children, and quality appraisal of the studies was conducted.Results26 studies were included; none of which specifically reported on the prevalence of ADEs. Three ADR studies reported a median prevalence of 28.3% of patients (IQR 13); >70% of reactions warranted withdrawal of medication. Sixteen studies reported on prescribing errors and the median prescribing error rate in all paediatric contexts was 10.7% of prescriptions (IQR 6) Seven studies explored prescribing errors in PICU and the prevalence was twice that in non-ICU areas (11.1% prescriptions; IQR 2.9 versus 6.5% prescriptions; IQR 4.3). The median rate of dose prescribing errors was 11.1% doses prescribed (IQR 10.6). Four studies reported administration errors of which three used consistent methods. Across these three studies, a median prevalence of 12.4% of administrations (IQR 7.3) was found. Administration technique errors represented 53% of these errors (IQR 14.7). Errors detected during medicines reconciliation at hospital admission affected 43% of patients, 33% (IQR 13) of prescribed medication with 70.3% (IQR 14) classified as potentially harmful. Medication errors detected during reconciliation on discharge from hospital affected 33% of patients and 19.7% of medicines, with 22% considered potentially harmful. No studies examined the prevalence of monitoring or dispensing errors.ConclusionsChildren are commonly affected by drug-related problems throughout their hospital journey. Given the high prevalence and risk of patient harm, there is an urgent need for outcome-focussed research on preventable ADEs in paediatric hospital settings in the UK. A deeper understanding of medication processes for children in hospital from a systems and theoretical perspective will also support the development and tragetting of effective interventions to improve patient safety.ReferencesChief Medical Officer. An Organisation With a Memory. London; 2000.Kaushal R, Bates DW, Landrigan C, et al. Medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. JAMA 2001;285:2114–2120.Ghaleb MA, Barber N, Franklin BD, Yeung VWS, Khaki ZF, Wong ICK. Systematic review of medication errors in pediatric patients. Ann Pharmacother 2006;40:1766–1776.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document