Vector-Valued Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Effects of Vertical Ground Motions on the Seismic Response of Highway Bridges

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 999-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeynep Gülerce ◽  
Norman A. Abrahamson
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Seismic Response ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Vertical Component ◽  
Highway Bridges ◽  
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard ◽  
Vertical Ground Motion ◽  
Vertical Ground Motions ◽  
Vertical Ground

The vertical ground motion component is disregarded in the design of ordinary highway bridges in California, except for the bridges located in high seismic zones (sites with design horizontal peak ground acceleration greater than 0.6 g). The influence of vertical ground motion on the seismic response of single-bent, two-span highway bridges designed according to Caltrans Seismic Design Code (SDC-2006) is evaluated. A probabilistic seismic hazard framework is used to address the probability of exceeding the elastic capacity for various structural parameters when the vertical component is included. Negative mid-span moment demand is found to be the structural parameter that is most sensitive to vertical accelerations.A series of hazard curves for negative mid-span moment are developed for a suite of sites in Northern California. The annual probability of exceeding the elastic capacity of the negative mid-span moment is as large as 0.01 for the sites close to active faults when the vertical component is included. Simplified approaches based on the distance to major faults or the median design peak acceleration show that there is a large chance (0.4 to 0.65) of exceeding the elastic limit if the current 0.6 g threshold is used for the consideration of vertical ground motions for ordinary highway bridges. The results of this study provide the technical basis for consideration of a revision of the 0.6 g threshold.

scholarly journals Numerical assessment of vertical ground motion effects on highway bridges

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 790-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadi Aryan ◽  
Mehdi Ghassemieh
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Vertical Component ◽  
Time History ◽  
Highway Bridges ◽  
Vertical Excitation ◽  
Vertical Ground Motion ◽  
Field Evidence ◽  
Vertical Ground

Field evidence of recent earthquakes shows serious bridge damages due to the direct compression or tension in the columns and some flexural and shear failures caused by the variation in axial force of the columns. These damages could not be produced solely by the horizontal seismic excitations; the vertical component of the earthquake is involved. This paper presents a numerical study highlighting the presence of vertical seismic excitation. Nonlinear time history analyses are conducted on detailed three-dimensional models of multi-span simply supported and multi-span continuous bridges using a suite of representative ground motions. The results showed the significant influence of vertical excitation on the bridge responses. Therefore, it is imperative to include more efficient criteria to upgrade the design codes and extend practical techniques that consider and cope with the structural effects of vertical ground motion along with the horizontal excitations.

scholarly journals How significant is vertical ground motion from low magnitude earthquakes?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janneke van Ginkel ◽  
Elmer Ruigrok ◽  
Rien Herber
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Hazard Assessment ◽  
Site Response ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Vertical Component ◽  
Vertical Motion ◽  
Vertical Ground Motion ◽  
Vertical Ground ◽  
Low Magnitude

<p>Up to now, almost all of the ground motion modeling and hazard assessment for seismicity in the Netherlands focuses on horizontal motion. As a rule of thumb, the strength of vertical ground motions is taken as 2/3 of that of horizontal ground motions. In reality of course, amplifications and V/H ratios are site-dependent and thus vary regionally.  Recent studies have indeed shown that vertical ground motion is not always simply 2/3 of the horizontal motion. However, these studies are performed in areas with high magnitude (Mw>5.0) earthquakes and the question is whether vertical motion is relevant to be included in seismic hazard assessment for low magnitude earthquakes (to date, max Mw=3.6 in Groningen).</p><p>In the Netherlands, the top part of the soils is practically always unconsolidated, so the elastic waves generated by deeper (~3000m) seated earthquakes will be subject to transformation when arriving in these layers. Recordings over a range of depth levels in the Groningen borehole network show the largest amplification to occur in the upper 50 meters of the sedimentary cover. We not only observe a strong amplification from shear waves on the horizontal components, but also from longitudinal waves on the vertical component. A better understanding of vertical motion of low magnitude earthquakes aims to support the design of re-enforcement measures for buildings in areas affected by low magnitude seismicity. Furthermore, interference between the longitudinal -and shear waves might contribute to damage on structures.</p><p>This study presents observations of longitudinal wave amplification in the frequency band 1-10 Hz, corresponding to resonance periods of Dutch buildings. From 19 seismic events, with a minimum of magnitude two, we retrieved transfer functions (TFs) from the vertical component, showing a strong site response at certain locations. In addition, we calculate event V/H ratios and VH factors from the surface seismometer. These results are compared with the TFs and show a similar pattern in terms of site response. Furthermore, the sites with highest vertical amplification correspond to very low (800-900 m/s) P-wave velocities. Our study shows that vertical amplification is very site dependent. However, the question whether the vertical motion is significant enough to form a real hazard can only be answered through cooperation between seismologist and structural engineer.</p>

Empirical Site Amplification Modelling for Horizontal and Vertical Ground Motions in Taiwan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Hsiang Kuo ◽  
Shu-Hsien Chao ◽  
Che-Min Lin ◽  
Jyun-Yan Huang ◽  
Kuo-Liang Wen
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Amplification Factor ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Free Field ◽  
Site Amplification ◽  
Amplification Factors ◽  
Taipei Basin ◽  
Vertical Ground Motions ◽  
Vertical Ground ◽  
Site Amplification Factor

<p>Site amplification behavior are important in ground motion prediction. Seismic waves were amplified and caused significant building damages in the Taipei Basin by the 1986 Hualien offshore (subduction interface) and the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquakes (crustal), for which both of the epicentral distances were nearly 100 km. To understand local site amplifications in Taiwan, empirical site amplification factors for both horizontal and vertical ground motions are studied using recently constructed strong motion and site databases for the free-field TSMIP stations. Records of large magnitude earthquakes of M<sub>W</sub> larger than 5.5 from 1991 to 2016 were selected for this study. Site amplification factors at site conditions with Vs30 between 120 m/s to 1600 m/s and bedrock accelerations up to 0.8 g were evaluated using ratios of spectral accelerations at different periods. The reference site condition, i.e. the engineering bedrock, is assumed as Vs30 of 760 m/s (B/C boundary) in this study. Our empirical site amplification form are borrowed from the site response function of ASK14 and CY14 ground motion models in NGA-West2 project with slight modification. Therefore our site amplification model includes a linear amplification term and a nonlinear deamplification term. The coefficients of the empirical models were obtained by a nonlinear regression analysis using the selected Taiwan data. Site amplification factor is a function of Vs30 and spectral intensity in the model. Similar linear site amplification factor to the NGA models is derived in our model; however, more significant soil nonlinearity behavior than the NGA models is likely captured from the empirical data. The amplification factor in vertical component is smaller than that in horizontal.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document