Relative Performance of Kobe and Northridge WSMF Buildings

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1081-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce F. Maison ◽  
Kazuhiko Kasai ◽  
Yoji Ooki
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
The United States ◽  
Office Building ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Moment Frame ◽  
Moment Connections ◽  
Steel Moment Frame ◽  
Welded Steel ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Seismic Behaviors

Seismic behaviors of a five-story welded steel moment-frame (WSMF) office building in Kobe, Japan, and a six-story WSMF office building in Northridge, California, are compared. Both experienced earthquake damage (1995 Kobe and 1994 Northridge earthquakes, respectively). Computer models of the buildings are formulated, having the ability to simulate damage in terms of fractured moment connections. Analyses are conducted to assess building response during the earthquakes. The calibrated models are then analyzed using a suite of earthquake records to compare building performance under consistent demands. The Kobe building is found to be more rugged than the Northridge building. Analysis suggests it would experience much less damage than the Northridge building from shaking equivalent to 2,500-year earthquake for a generic Los Angeles site. Superior performance of the Kobe building is attributed to its relatively greater stiffness and strength. The results provide insight into the difference in seismic fragility expected for this class of mid-rise WSMF buildings in Japan and the United States.

Earthquake Loss Estimation Methods for Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 365-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Kircher
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Joint Venture ◽  
Loss Estimation ◽  
Loss Functions ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Seismic Evaluation ◽  
Moment Frame ◽  
Steel Moment Frame ◽  
Welded Steel ◽  
Frame Buildings

This paper describes procedures that may be used by experienced structural engineers to develop earthquake damage and related loss functions for welded steel moment-frame (WSMF) buildings. The damage and loss functions are based on and compatible with the loss estimation methods of HAZUS, a technology developed by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for assessing regional impacts of earthquakes. The loss estimation procedures were developed by the SAC Steel Program as described in SAC Joint Venture Topical Report SAC/BD-99/13. These procedures form the basis for Appendix B of FEMA-351, Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings. The procedures for developing damage and loss functions for WSMF building response are general in nature and applicable to WSMF buildings designed to different seismic criteria and having different connection details. Default values of damage and loss function parameters are provided for typical 3-story, 9-story, and 20-story WSMF buildings, designed for Los Angeles, Seattle, or Boston seismic criteria and having pre-Northridge, post-Northridge, or damaged pre-Northridge connection conditions.

ASCE-41 and FEMA-351 Evaluation of E-Defense Collapse Test

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 927-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce F. Maison ◽  
Kazuhiko Kasai ◽  
Gregory Deierlein
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Evaluation ◽  
Moment Frame ◽  
Steel Moment Frame ◽  
Welded Steel ◽  
Seismic Rehabilitation ◽  
Frame Building ◽  
Weak Beam ◽  
Beam Design ◽  
Safe Side ◽  
Computer Analyses

A welded steel moment-frame building is used to assess performance-based engineering guidelines. The full-scale four-story building was shaken to collapse on the E-Defense shake table in Japan. The collapse mode was a side-sway mechanism in the first story, which occurred in spite of a strong-column and weak-beam design. Computer analyses were conducted to simulate the building response during the experiment. The building was then evaluated using the Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (ASCE-41) and Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings (FEMA-351) for the collapse prevention performance level via linear and nonlinear procedures. The guidelines had mixed results regarding the characterization of collapse, and no single approach was superior. They mostly erred on the safe side by predicting collapse at shaking intensities less than that in the experiment. Recommendations are made for guideline improvements.

scholarly journals Hope for the Best, Prepare for the Worst: Response of Tall Steel Buildings to the ShakeOut Scenario Earthquake

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 375-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Muto ◽  
Swaminathan Krishnan
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Steel Buildings ◽  
Moment Frame ◽  
Steel Moment Frame ◽  
Damage Scenario ◽  
San Gabriel Valley ◽  
San Fernando ◽  
Simulated Ground Motions ◽  
Available Information

This work represents an effort to develop one plausible realization of the effects of the scenario event on tall steel moment-frame buildings. We have used the simulated ground motions with three-dimensional nonlinear finite element models of three buildings in the 20-story class to simulate structural responses at 784 analysis sites spaced at approximately 4 km throughout the San Fernando Valley, the San Gabriel Valley, and the Los Angeles Basin. Based on the simulation results and available information on the number and distribution of steel buildings, the recommended damage scenario for the ShakeOut drill was 5% of the estimated 150 steel moment-frame structures in the 10–30 story range collapsing, 10% red-tagged, 15% with damage serious enough to cause loss of life, and 20% with visible damage requiring building closure.

Overview of the U.S. Program for Reduction of Earthquake Hazards in Steel Moment-Frame Structures

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Mahin ◽  
James O. Malley ◽  
Ronald O. Hamburger ◽  
Michael Mahoney
Keyword(s):  
Guideline Development ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
The United States ◽  
Frame Structures ◽  
Earthquake Hazards ◽  
Steel Buildings ◽  
Moment Frame ◽  
Steel Moment Frame ◽  
The U.S ◽  
Design And Construction

Considerable research has been conducted worldwide to assess the unexpected damage to welded steel moment-frame buildings during the 1989 Loma Prieta, 1994 Northridge, and 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquakes, as well as to find effective and economical remedies that can be incorporated into analysis, design, and construction practices. A major six-year program has been undertaken with the sponsorship of the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to synthesize and interpret the results of this research, and to conduct additional investigations to develop reliable, practical, and cost-effective guidelines for the design and construction of new steel moment-frame structures, as well as for the inspection, evaluation and repair or upgrading of existing ones. Topics investigated as part of this program include (1) performance of steel buildings in past earthquakes; (2) material properties and fracture issues; (3) joining and inspection; (4) connection performance; (5) system performance; (6) performance prediction and evaluation; and (7) social, economic, and political impacts. The project utilizes a performance-based engineering framework and addresses issues pertaining to various types of steel moment-resisting frames including those utilizing welded, bolted, and partially restrained connections. The guidelines are applicable to regions of low, medium, and high seismicity throughout the United States. This paper reviews the overall organization and management of this program of research, guideline development, training and peer evaluation, the scope of the investigations undertaken, and the general organization and contents of the guidelines developed.

scholarly journals Performance of Two 18-Story Steel Moment-Frame Buildings in Southern California during Two Large Simulated San Andreas Earthquakes

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1035-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swaminathan Krishnan ◽  
Chen Ji ◽  
Dimitri Komatitsch ◽  
Jeroen Tromp
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Southern California ◽  
Building Code ◽  
Los Angeles Basin ◽  
Moment Frame ◽  
Steel Moment Frame ◽  
Existing Building ◽  
San Andreas ◽  
Frame Buildings ◽  
San Fernando

Using state-of-the-art computational tools in seismology and structural engineering, validated using data from the Mw=6.7 January 1994 Northridge earthquake, we determine the damage to two 18-story steel moment-frame buildings, one existing and one new, located in southern California due to ground motions from two hypothetical magnitude 7.9 earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault. The new building has the same configuration as the existing building but has been redesigned to current building code standards. Two cases are considered: rupture initiating at Parkfield and propagating from north to south, and rupture propagating from south to north and terminating at Parkfield. Severe damage occurs in these buildings at many locations in the region in the north-to-south rupture scenario. Peak velocities of 1 m.s−1 and 2 m.s−1 occur in the Los Angeles Basin and San Fernando Valley, respectively, while the corresponding peak displacements are about 1 m and 2 m, respectively. Peak interstory drifts in the two buildings exceed 0.10 and 0.06 in many areas of the San Fernando Valley and the Los Angeles Basin, respectively. The redesigned building performs significantly better than the existing building; however, its improved design based on the 1997 Uniform Building Code is still not adequate to prevent serious damage. The results from the south-to-north scenario are not as alarming, although damage is serious enough to cause significant business interruption and compromise life safety.

scholarly journals Assembly-Based Vulnerability of Buildings and Its Use in Performance Evaluation

2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith A. Porter ◽  
Anne S. Kiremidjian ◽  
Jeremiah S. LeGrue
Keyword(s):  
Cost Estimation ◽  
Seismic Vulnerability ◽  
Structural Model ◽  
Structural Response ◽  
Time History ◽  
Simulation Approach ◽  
Moment Frame ◽  
Steel Moment Frame ◽  
Welded Steel ◽  
Specific Level

Assembly-based vulnerability (ABV) is a framework for evaluating the seismic vulnerability and performance of buildings on a building-specific basis. It utilizes the damage to individual building components and accounts for the building's seismic setting, structural and nonstructural design and use. A simulation approach to implementing ABV first applies a ground motion time history to a structural model to determine structural response. The response is applied to assembly fragility functions to simulate damage to each structural and nonstructural element in the building, and to its contents. Probabilistic construction cost estimation and scheduling are used to estimate repair cost and loss-of-use duration as random variables. It also provides a framework for accumulating post-earthquake damage observations in a statistically systematic and consistent manner. The framework and simulation approach are novel in that they are fully probabilistic, address damage at a highly detailed and building-specific level, and do not rely extensively on expert opinion. ABV is illustrated using an example pre-Northridge welded-steel-moment-frame office building.

Bulldozers or Ships—What’s the Difference?

2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 45-51
Author(s):  
Tarsem Jutla ◽  
Pat Crilly ◽  
Gordon Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Technology Development ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
New Technology ◽  
The United States ◽  
Structural Components ◽  
Global Marketplace ◽  
Welded Steel ◽  
Maximum Value ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Earthmoving Equipment

This paper explains Caterpillar's approach to maintaining leadership position in designing and manufacturing fabricated structures, and highlights some of the technologies that are used to make welded steel components. Caterpillar's customers continue to look for maximum value from our machines and, to meet their increasing expectations, investment in new technology is a necessity. To build lightweight, high quality, long life structural components, Caterpillar uses state-of-the-art design tools, process simulation technologies and the latest manufacturing processes. It is the authors' perception that there are many synergisms between ship construction and the manufacture of earthmoving equipment. This paper debates networking between the two industries for cross-industry technology development and knowledge transfer. This can potentially improve the competitiveness of the United States in the ever-increasing global marketplace.

Evaluating and Upgrading Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings Using FEMA-351

2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Hooper
Keyword(s):  
Earthquake Engineering ◽  
Joint Venture ◽  
Northridge Earthquake ◽  
Seismic Evaluation ◽  
Moment Frame ◽  
Steel Moment Frame ◽  
Welded Steel ◽  
Frame Design ◽  
Frame Buildings ◽  
Simplified Procedures

In July 2000, the SAC Joint Venture (a joint venture of the Structural Engineers Association of California, the Applied Technology Council, and California Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering) prepared a series of recommendations regarding welded steel moment-frame design, evaluation, and upgrade procedures. FEMA-351, Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, was developed to evaluate the probable performance of existing steel moment-frame buildings in future earthquakes and to provide guidance or upgrading these buildings. The procedures introduced in FEMA-351 allow the determination of the level of confidence a structure will be able to achieve based on a specified performance objective, using simplified analytical methods. Simplified procedures for estimating the probable post-earthquake repair costs and nonstructural damage, based on the losses incurred in the 1994 Northridge earthquake, are presented as well. This paper provides a brief chapter-by-chapter overview of the information contained in FEMA-351 and emphasizes the performance evaluation procedures by stepping through the process using an example building.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document